Does Accountability Require Agency? Comment on Responsibility and Accountability in the Algorithmic Society.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-12 DOI:10.1007/s13347-025-01014-z
Tillmann Vierkant
{"title":"Does Accountability Require Agency? Comment on Responsibility and Accountability in the Algorithmic Society.","authors":"Tillmann Vierkant","doi":"10.1007/s13347-025-01014-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In their intriguing paper <i>Responsibility and Accountability in an Algorithmic Society (2025)</i> the authors argue that the debate on how to deal with responsibility related issues with algorithmic agents requires a distinction between responsibility and accountability. In this comment to their paper, it is argued that while the notion of accountability as understood by the authors brings some significant benefits it also is ambiguous in an important way. Accountability could be understood as being purely instrumental with regard to general morally desirable consequences or it could be understood as necessarily containing an element of scaffolding for the agent who is held to account. The comment develops the options and discusses the consequences of choosing either of them.</p>","PeriodicalId":39065,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Technology","volume":"39 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12795937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-01014-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In their intriguing paper Responsibility and Accountability in an Algorithmic Society (2025) the authors argue that the debate on how to deal with responsibility related issues with algorithmic agents requires a distinction between responsibility and accountability. In this comment to their paper, it is argued that while the notion of accountability as understood by the authors brings some significant benefits it also is ambiguous in an important way. Accountability could be understood as being purely instrumental with regard to general morally desirable consequences or it could be understood as necessarily containing an element of scaffolding for the agent who is held to account. The comment develops the options and discusses the consequences of choosing either of them.

问责制需要机构吗?论算法社会中的责任与问责。
在他们有趣的论文《算法社会中的责任和问责制》(2025)中,作者认为,关于如何处理与算法代理相关的责任问题的辩论需要区分责任和问责制。在这篇论文的评论中,有人认为,虽然作者所理解的问责制概念带来了一些显著的好处,但在一个重要的方面,它也是模糊的。问责制可以被理解为纯粹的工具,就一般道德上可取的结果而言,或者它可以被理解为必然包含对被追究责任的行为人的脚手架元素。该评论发展了选项,并讨论了选择其中任何一个的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philosophy and Technology
Philosophy and Technology Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书