Extending Risk Horizons: Impact of Carbon Emissions on Firm Default Risk Based on Global Panel Data

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Masayasu Kanno
{"title":"Extending Risk Horizons: Impact of Carbon Emissions on Firm Default Risk Based on Global Panel Data","authors":"Masayasu Kanno","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.22808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study assesses the impact of carbon emissions on firms' default risk in 44 major countries for overcoming the “tragedy of the horizon.” Carbon emissions affect firms' risk profiles at risk horizons through physical and transitional climate risks. A critical management issue is the likelihood and magnitude of climate change's impacts affecting firms' credit risk. We propose a random-effects logistic generalized least squares regression model for panel data to examine the impacts and the firm heterogeneity by country and sector. The global and country-wise panel data analyses show that carbon emissions increase firms' PDs in the global and four-country markets for all risk horizons, whereas the sector-wise analyses show that high carbon emissions reduce firms' PDs only in the industrials sector out of four sectors. In addition, for three countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan) and four sectors, the longer the risk horizon, the more the heterogeneity represented by the between-firm residual variance decreases, whereas for China, the heterogeneity with Scope 3 fluctuates. Overall, this study provides an effective credit risk analysis methodology that considers carbon emissions for related entities, such as firms, lenders, investors, regulators, and policymakers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":"37 1","pages":"81-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of carbon emissions on firms' default risk in 44 major countries for overcoming the “tragedy of the horizon.” Carbon emissions affect firms' risk profiles at risk horizons through physical and transitional climate risks. A critical management issue is the likelihood and magnitude of climate change's impacts affecting firms' credit risk. We propose a random-effects logistic generalized least squares regression model for panel data to examine the impacts and the firm heterogeneity by country and sector. The global and country-wise panel data analyses show that carbon emissions increase firms' PDs in the global and four-country markets for all risk horizons, whereas the sector-wise analyses show that high carbon emissions reduce firms' PDs only in the industrials sector out of four sectors. In addition, for three countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan) and four sectors, the longer the risk horizon, the more the heterogeneity represented by the between-firm residual variance decreases, whereas for China, the heterogeneity with Scope 3 fluctuates. Overall, this study provides an effective credit risk analysis methodology that considers carbon emissions for related entities, such as firms, lenders, investors, regulators, and policymakers.

扩展风险视野:基于全球面板数据的碳排放对企业违约风险的影响
本研究评估了碳排放对44个主要国家克服“地平线悲剧”的企业违约风险的影响。碳排放通过物理和过渡性气候风险影响企业在风险视界上的风险概况。一个关键的管理问题是气候变化影响企业信用风险的可能性和程度。我们为面板数据提出了一个随机效应logistic广义最小二乘回归模型,以检验国家和行业的影响和企业异质性。全球和国家面板数据分析表明,碳排放增加了全球和四个国家市场中所有风险水平的公司的pd,而行业分析表明,高碳排放仅在四个行业中的工业部门降低了公司的pd。此外,对于三个国家(美国、英国和日本)和四个行业,风险期越长,企业间剩余方差所代表的异质性越低,而对于中国,范围3的异质性波动较大。总体而言,本研究提供了一种有效的信用风险分析方法,该方法考虑了相关实体(如公司、贷方、投资者、监管机构和政策制定者)的碳排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书