Mechanics-Oriented Coil Size Selection for an Internal Carotid Aneurysm With Fluid–Structure Interaction

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jiakun Han, Na Zhao, Wei Li, Shiwei Zhao
{"title":"Mechanics-Oriented Coil Size Selection for an Internal Carotid Aneurysm With Fluid–Structure Interaction","authors":"Jiakun Han,&nbsp;Na Zhao,&nbsp;Wei Li,&nbsp;Shiwei Zhao","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The coil intervention is a common aneurysm treatment strategy, but the effect of coil size on aneurysm hemodynamics and mechanics is not fully understood. In this paper, how different sizes of coils affect the hemodynamic and mechanical properties of a real internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm was investigated. A fluid–structure interaction (FSI) method based on the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) approach was used to consider non-Newtonian blood flow, linear elastic arterial wall and simulations. It is indicated that with the increase of coil size, the hemodynamic parameters related to aneurysm such as wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged WSS (TAWSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) decreased significantly. However, too large coils will compress the parent artery, produce high TAWSS areas in adjacent branches, and cause stress concentration on the aneurysm wall. Moreover, both the average displacement and von Mises stress of the aneurysm dome initially decrease and then increase with coil size. The appropriate size of the coil is beneficial to minimize displacement and stress by reducing blood flow velocity and vortices. The effects of different coil sizes were predicted by computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and the individualized treatment plan was adjusted according to the aneurysm morphology and hemodynamic characteristics. Our results provide a new theoretical basis for interventional therapy and help to promote the transformation of coil intervention from empirical filling to mechanics-oriented precision treatment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coil intervention is a common aneurysm treatment strategy, but the effect of coil size on aneurysm hemodynamics and mechanics is not fully understood. In this paper, how different sizes of coils affect the hemodynamic and mechanical properties of a real internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm was investigated. A fluid–structure interaction (FSI) method based on the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) approach was used to consider non-Newtonian blood flow, linear elastic arterial wall and simulations. It is indicated that with the increase of coil size, the hemodynamic parameters related to aneurysm such as wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged WSS (TAWSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) decreased significantly. However, too large coils will compress the parent artery, produce high TAWSS areas in adjacent branches, and cause stress concentration on the aneurysm wall. Moreover, both the average displacement and von Mises stress of the aneurysm dome initially decrease and then increase with coil size. The appropriate size of the coil is beneficial to minimize displacement and stress by reducing blood flow velocity and vortices. The effects of different coil sizes were predicted by computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and the individualized treatment plan was adjusted according to the aneurysm morphology and hemodynamic characteristics. Our results provide a new theoretical basis for interventional therapy and help to promote the transformation of coil intervention from empirical filling to mechanics-oriented precision treatment.

Abstract Image

具有流固相互作用的颈内动脉瘤的力学导向线圈尺寸选择。
动脉瘤介入治疗是一种常见的动脉瘤治疗策略,但线圈大小对动脉瘤血流动力学和力学的影响尚不完全清楚。本文研究了不同尺寸线圈对真实颈内动脉(ICA)动脉瘤血流动力学和力学性能的影响。采用基于任意拉格朗日-欧拉(ALE)方法的流固相互作用(FSI)方法考虑非牛顿血流、线性弹性动脉壁和模拟。结果表明,随着线圈尺寸的增大,与动脉瘤相关的血流动力学参数壁面剪切应力(WSS)、时间平均剪切应力(TAWSS)和振荡剪切指数(OSI)均显著降低。然而,太大的线圈会压缩载动脉,在邻近分支产生高TAWSS区域,并导致动脉瘤壁应力集中。动脉瘤穹窿的平均位移和von Mises应力均随线圈尺寸的增大先减小后增大。适当的线圈尺寸有利于通过降低血流速度和漩涡来减少位移和应力。利用计算流体动力学(CFD)预测不同线圈尺寸的影响,并根据动脉瘤形态和血流动力学特征调整个体化治疗方案。本研究结果为介入治疗提供了新的理论依据,有助于推动线圈介入由经验填充向以力学为导向的精准治疗转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书