Outcome of Individual Outpatient Psychotherapy in Adults Under Clinically Representative Conditions in Austria

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Elke Humer, Yvonne Schaffler, Katja Haider, Christoph Pieh, Barbara Haid, Wolfgang Schimböck, Peter Stippl, Brigitte Schigl, Thomas Probst
{"title":"Outcome of Individual Outpatient Psychotherapy in Adults Under Clinically Representative Conditions in Austria","authors":"Elke Humer,&nbsp;Yvonne Schaffler,&nbsp;Katja Haider,&nbsp;Christoph Pieh,&nbsp;Barbara Haid,&nbsp;Wolfgang Schimböck,&nbsp;Peter Stippl,&nbsp;Brigitte Schigl,&nbsp;Thomas Probst","doi":"10.1002/capr.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>While randomised controlled trials have established the efficacy of psychotherapy, their applicability to routine care is limited. Naturalistic studies offer ecological validity, but representative data for the effectiveness of psychotherapy in Austrian outpatient private settings are lacking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined psychotherapy outcomes under real-world conditions in Austria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Austrian psychotherapists in outpatient private practice were invited to participate by enrolling patients in the study (recruitment: September 2020 to December 2023). Outcomes were assessed at the start of therapy (baseline assessment) and at the end of therapy or study (post assessment). Outcome questionnaires included the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH), the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7), and the Standardised Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SAS-PD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-seven psychotherapists from the four psychotherapeutic clusters (psychoanalytic-psychodynamic, humanistic, systemic, behavioural) participated in the study. Of 163 patients completing the baseline-assessment, 58 (35.6%) provided post-assessment data (treated by 39 psychotherapists). Missing post-assessment values were estimated using the Baseline Observation Carried Forward method, yielding small to moderate effect sizes (<i>d</i> = 0.21 to 0.48), and the Expectation Maximisation method, resulting in small to large effects (<i>d</i> = 0.32 to 1.08). Analyses based on the patients with complete baseline- and post-assessment revealed small to large effects (<i>d</i> = 0.36 to 1.03).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Results indicate that psychotherapy in Austrian private practice yields significant improvements in mental health. Future studies should investigate strategies to enhance recruitment to ensure a more comprehensive database for psychotherapy research in Austria.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.70074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.70074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While randomised controlled trials have established the efficacy of psychotherapy, their applicability to routine care is limited. Naturalistic studies offer ecological validity, but representative data for the effectiveness of psychotherapy in Austrian outpatient private settings are lacking.

Aim

This study examined psychotherapy outcomes under real-world conditions in Austria.

Method

Austrian psychotherapists in outpatient private practice were invited to participate by enrolling patients in the study (recruitment: September 2020 to December 2023). Outcomes were assessed at the start of therapy (baseline assessment) and at the end of therapy or study (post assessment). Outcome questionnaires included the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH), the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7), and the Standardised Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SAS-PD).

Results

Eighty-seven psychotherapists from the four psychotherapeutic clusters (psychoanalytic-psychodynamic, humanistic, systemic, behavioural) participated in the study. Of 163 patients completing the baseline-assessment, 58 (35.6%) provided post-assessment data (treated by 39 psychotherapists). Missing post-assessment values were estimated using the Baseline Observation Carried Forward method, yielding small to moderate effect sizes (d = 0.21 to 0.48), and the Expectation Maximisation method, resulting in small to large effects (d = 0.32 to 1.08). Analyses based on the patients with complete baseline- and post-assessment revealed small to large effects (d = 0.36 to 1.03).

Conclusions

Results indicate that psychotherapy in Austrian private practice yields significant improvements in mental health. Future studies should investigate strategies to enhance recruitment to ensure a more comprehensive database for psychotherapy research in Austria.

Abstract Image

奥地利临床代表性条件下成人个体门诊心理治疗的结果
背景:虽然随机对照试验已经证实了心理治疗的有效性,但其在日常护理中的适用性是有限的。自然主义研究提供了生态有效性,但缺乏奥地利门诊私人设置心理治疗有效性的代表性数据。目的本研究考察了奥地利现实世界条件下的心理治疗结果。方法通过招募患者,邀请奥地利门诊私人诊所的心理治疗师参与研究(招募时间:2020年9月至2023年12月)。在治疗开始(基线评估)和治疗或研究结束(后评估)时评估结果。结果问卷包括积极心理健康量表(PMH)、世卫组织残疾评估表(WHODAS)、患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7 (GAD-7)和人格障碍严重程度标准化评估(SAS-PD)。结果来自精神分析-精神动力、人本、系统和行为四个心理治疗集群的87名心理治疗师参与了研究。在163名完成基线评估的患者中,58名(35.6%)提供了评估后的数据(由39名心理治疗师治疗)。使用基线观察结转法估计缺失的后评估值,产生小到中等的效应量(d = 0.21至0.48),使用期望最大化法产生小到大的效应量(d = 0.32至1.08)。基于完成基线和后评估的患者的分析显示,效果从小到大(d = 0.36至1.03)。结论:结果表明,奥地利私人诊所的心理治疗显著改善了心理健康。未来的研究应该调查加强招募的策略,以确保奥地利心理治疗研究有一个更全面的数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书