Towards identification of network applications in encrypted traffic

IF 2.2 4区 计算机科学 Q3 TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Ivana Burgetová, Petr Matoušek, Ondřej Ryšavý
{"title":"Towards identification of network applications in encrypted traffic","authors":"Ivana Burgetová,&nbsp;Petr Matoušek,&nbsp;Ondřej Ryšavý","doi":"10.1007/s12243-025-01114-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Network traffic monitoring for security threat detection and network performance management is challenging due to the encryption of most communications. This article addresses the problem of identifying network applications associated with Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections. The evaluation of three primary approaches to classifying TLS-encrypted traffic was carried out: fingerprinting methods, Server Name Indication (SNI)–based identification, and machine learning–based classifiers. Each method has its own strengths and limitations: fingerprinting relies on a regularly updated database of known hashes, SNI is vulnerable to obfuscation or missing information, and AI techniques such as machine learning require sufficient labeled training data. A comparison of these methods highlights the challenges of identifying individual applications, as the TLS properties are significantly shared between applications. Nevertheless, even when identifying a collection of candidate applications, a valuable insight into network monitoring can be gained, and this can be achieved with high accuracy by all the methods considered. To facilitate further research in this area, a novel publicly available dataset of TLS communications has been created, with the communications annotated for popular desktop and mobile applications. Furthermore, the results of three different approaches to refine TLS traffic classification based on a combination of basic classifiers and context are presented. Finally, practical use cases are proposed, and future research directions are identified to further improve application identification methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50761,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Telecommunications","volume":"80 -","pages":"1015 - 1032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12243-025-01114-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Telecommunications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12243-025-01114-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TELECOMMUNICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Network traffic monitoring for security threat detection and network performance management is challenging due to the encryption of most communications. This article addresses the problem of identifying network applications associated with Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections. The evaluation of three primary approaches to classifying TLS-encrypted traffic was carried out: fingerprinting methods, Server Name Indication (SNI)–based identification, and machine learning–based classifiers. Each method has its own strengths and limitations: fingerprinting relies on a regularly updated database of known hashes, SNI is vulnerable to obfuscation or missing information, and AI techniques such as machine learning require sufficient labeled training data. A comparison of these methods highlights the challenges of identifying individual applications, as the TLS properties are significantly shared between applications. Nevertheless, even when identifying a collection of candidate applications, a valuable insight into network monitoring can be gained, and this can be achieved with high accuracy by all the methods considered. To facilitate further research in this area, a novel publicly available dataset of TLS communications has been created, with the communications annotated for popular desktop and mobile applications. Furthermore, the results of three different approaches to refine TLS traffic classification based on a combination of basic classifiers and context are presented. Finally, practical use cases are proposed, and future research directions are identified to further improve application identification methods.

在加密流量中识别网络应用
由于大多数通信都是加密的,因此对网络流量进行安全威胁检测和网络性能管理具有挑战性。本文讨论识别与传输层安全性(TLS)连接相关的网络应用程序的问题。对tls加密流量分类的三种主要方法进行了评估:指纹方法、基于服务器名称指示(SNI)的识别和基于机器学习的分类器。每种方法都有自己的优势和局限性:指纹识别依赖于定期更新的已知散列数据库,SNI容易受到混淆或信息缺失的影响,而机器学习等人工智能技术需要足够的标记训练数据。这些方法的比较突出了识别单个应用程序的挑战,因为TLS属性在应用程序之间显着共享。然而,即使在确定候选应用程序的集合时,也可以获得对网络监视的有价值的见解,并且可以通过所考虑的所有方法以高精度实现这一点。为了促进这一领域的进一步研究,已经创建了一个新的公开可用的TLS通信数据集,并为流行的桌面和移动应用程序注释了通信。此外,给出了基于基本分类器和上下文相结合的三种不同的TLS流量分类改进方法的结果。最后,提出了实际用例,并确定了未来的研究方向,以进一步改进应用识别方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Telecommunications
Annals of Telecommunications 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Telecommunications is an international journal publishing original peer-reviewed papers in the field of telecommunications. It covers all the essential branches of modern telecommunications, ranging from digital communications to communication networks and the internet, to software, protocols and services, uses and economics. This large spectrum of topics accounts for the rapid convergence through telecommunications of the underlying technologies in computers, communications, content management towards the emergence of the information and knowledge society. As a consequence, the Journal provides a medium for exchanging research results and technological achievements accomplished by the European and international scientific community from academia and industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书