Integrated multi-sectoral approach for planning of carbon capture and storage projects

IF 10.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Huizhong Zhang , Tianyuan Zhou , Siqi Wang , Zhiwei Li , Raymond R. Tan , Xiaoping Jia , Fang Wang
{"title":"Integrated multi-sectoral approach for planning of carbon capture and storage projects","authors":"Huizhong Zhang ,&nbsp;Tianyuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Siqi Wang ,&nbsp;Zhiwei Li ,&nbsp;Raymond R. Tan ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Jia ,&nbsp;Fang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2026.108785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) will play an important role in achieving carbon neutrality. In the deployment of CCS, it is important to identify an optimal network to allocate CO<sub>2</sub> between CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks. However, research on source-sink matching has been limited mostly to mathematical programming approaches with inherently limited interpretability to plan CCS involving different emission sectors and different storage reservoirs. Alternative techniques that may offer some interpretability advantages have not been explored as thoroughly. To address this research gap, this study introduces an integrated framework that synergistically combines Carbon Storage Composite Curves (CSCC) with Orthogonal Experimental Design (OED). This CSCC-OED framework is designed for the interpretable, multi-sectoral optimization of CCS infrastructure planning. It could coordinate the dynamic matching of CO₂ source-sink over a multi-decade planning horizon, while addressing constraints of storage capacity, operational timelines, and reservoir availability. The CSCC framework quantifies three critical metrics: additional storage requirement, total storage capacity, and excess capacity. Finally, global sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the effect of parameters on the CCS deployment based on the deployment factors identified by OED method. Results of the case study indicate that the start time of CO<sub>2</sub> reservoir is the most statistically significant factor. 10 Gt of CO₂ could be stored via three reservoirs commencing operation in 2025, which contributes to 81.63% of the sectoral emission reduction target. Furthermore, scenarios involving policy-, technology-, and economy-driven CCS pathways are analyzed. This work establishes a systematic decision-support tool for CCS infrastructure planning, emphasizing the criticality of coordinated multi-sectoral strategies and early reservoir deployment to meet carbon neutrality goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 108785"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344926000091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) will play an important role in achieving carbon neutrality. In the deployment of CCS, it is important to identify an optimal network to allocate CO2 between CO2 sources and sinks. However, research on source-sink matching has been limited mostly to mathematical programming approaches with inherently limited interpretability to plan CCS involving different emission sectors and different storage reservoirs. Alternative techniques that may offer some interpretability advantages have not been explored as thoroughly. To address this research gap, this study introduces an integrated framework that synergistically combines Carbon Storage Composite Curves (CSCC) with Orthogonal Experimental Design (OED). This CSCC-OED framework is designed for the interpretable, multi-sectoral optimization of CCS infrastructure planning. It could coordinate the dynamic matching of CO₂ source-sink over a multi-decade planning horizon, while addressing constraints of storage capacity, operational timelines, and reservoir availability. The CSCC framework quantifies three critical metrics: additional storage requirement, total storage capacity, and excess capacity. Finally, global sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the effect of parameters on the CCS deployment based on the deployment factors identified by OED method. Results of the case study indicate that the start time of CO2 reservoir is the most statistically significant factor. 10 Gt of CO₂ could be stored via three reservoirs commencing operation in 2025, which contributes to 81.63% of the sectoral emission reduction target. Furthermore, scenarios involving policy-, technology-, and economy-driven CCS pathways are analyzed. This work establishes a systematic decision-support tool for CCS infrastructure planning, emphasizing the criticality of coordinated multi-sectoral strategies and early reservoir deployment to meet carbon neutrality goals.

Abstract Image

规划碳捕获和封存项目的综合多部门办法
碳捕集与封存(CCS)将在实现碳中和方面发挥重要作用。在CCS的部署中,确定一个在CO2源和汇之间分配CO2的最佳网络是很重要的。然而,源汇匹配的研究大多局限于数学规划方法,在规划涉及不同排放部门和不同储层的CCS时,其可解释性本身就有限。可能提供一些可解释性优势的替代技术尚未得到彻底的探索。为了解决这一研究空白,本研究引入了一个综合框架,将碳储存复合曲线(CSCC)与正交实验设计(OED)协同结合。这个CSCC-OED框架是为可解释的、多部门的CCS基础设施规划优化而设计的。它可以在几十年的规划范围内协调CO₂源-汇的动态匹配,同时解决存储容量、运行时间表和水库可用性的限制。CSCC框架量化了三个关键指标:额外存储需求、总存储容量和过剩容量。最后,基于OED方法确定的CCS部署因素,进行全局敏感性分析,研究参数对CCS部署的影响。实例分析结果表明,CO2储层启动时间是最具统计学意义的影响因素。2025年开始运行的三个水库可储存10亿吨二氧化碳,这对行业减排目标的贡献为81.63%。此外,还分析了涉及政策、技术和经济驱动的CCS路径的情景。这项工作为CCS基础设施规划建立了一个系统的决策支持工具,强调了协调多部门战略和早期水库部署以实现碳中和目标的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书