Huizhong Zhang , Tianyuan Zhou , Siqi Wang , Zhiwei Li , Raymond R. Tan , Xiaoping Jia , Fang Wang
{"title":"Integrated multi-sectoral approach for planning of carbon capture and storage projects","authors":"Huizhong Zhang , Tianyuan Zhou , Siqi Wang , Zhiwei Li , Raymond R. Tan , Xiaoping Jia , Fang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2026.108785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) will play an important role in achieving carbon neutrality. In the deployment of CCS, it is important to identify an optimal network to allocate CO<sub>2</sub> between CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks. However, research on source-sink matching has been limited mostly to mathematical programming approaches with inherently limited interpretability to plan CCS involving different emission sectors and different storage reservoirs. Alternative techniques that may offer some interpretability advantages have not been explored as thoroughly. To address this research gap, this study introduces an integrated framework that synergistically combines Carbon Storage Composite Curves (CSCC) with Orthogonal Experimental Design (OED). This CSCC-OED framework is designed for the interpretable, multi-sectoral optimization of CCS infrastructure planning. It could coordinate the dynamic matching of CO₂ source-sink over a multi-decade planning horizon, while addressing constraints of storage capacity, operational timelines, and reservoir availability. The CSCC framework quantifies three critical metrics: additional storage requirement, total storage capacity, and excess capacity. Finally, global sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the effect of parameters on the CCS deployment based on the deployment factors identified by OED method. Results of the case study indicate that the start time of CO<sub>2</sub> reservoir is the most statistically significant factor. 10 Gt of CO₂ could be stored via three reservoirs commencing operation in 2025, which contributes to 81.63% of the sectoral emission reduction target. Furthermore, scenarios involving policy-, technology-, and economy-driven CCS pathways are analyzed. This work establishes a systematic decision-support tool for CCS infrastructure planning, emphasizing the criticality of coordinated multi-sectoral strategies and early reservoir deployment to meet carbon neutrality goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 108785"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344926000091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) will play an important role in achieving carbon neutrality. In the deployment of CCS, it is important to identify an optimal network to allocate CO2 between CO2 sources and sinks. However, research on source-sink matching has been limited mostly to mathematical programming approaches with inherently limited interpretability to plan CCS involving different emission sectors and different storage reservoirs. Alternative techniques that may offer some interpretability advantages have not been explored as thoroughly. To address this research gap, this study introduces an integrated framework that synergistically combines Carbon Storage Composite Curves (CSCC) with Orthogonal Experimental Design (OED). This CSCC-OED framework is designed for the interpretable, multi-sectoral optimization of CCS infrastructure planning. It could coordinate the dynamic matching of CO₂ source-sink over a multi-decade planning horizon, while addressing constraints of storage capacity, operational timelines, and reservoir availability. The CSCC framework quantifies three critical metrics: additional storage requirement, total storage capacity, and excess capacity. Finally, global sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the effect of parameters on the CCS deployment based on the deployment factors identified by OED method. Results of the case study indicate that the start time of CO2 reservoir is the most statistically significant factor. 10 Gt of CO₂ could be stored via three reservoirs commencing operation in 2025, which contributes to 81.63% of the sectoral emission reduction target. Furthermore, scenarios involving policy-, technology-, and economy-driven CCS pathways are analyzed. This work establishes a systematic decision-support tool for CCS infrastructure planning, emphasizing the criticality of coordinated multi-sectoral strategies and early reservoir deployment to meet carbon neutrality goals.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.