Melissa K. Lee , Eline Rega , Maarten Loopmans , Martina Otavova , Jos Van Orshoven , Raf Aerts , Ben Somers
{"title":"Socioeconomic inequities in visible, functional, and accessible green space exposure: A cross-sectional study in Flanders, Belgium","authors":"Melissa K. Lee , Eline Rega , Maarten Loopmans , Martina Otavova , Jos Van Orshoven , Raf Aerts , Ben Somers","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2026.129301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green space offers numerous benefits for health and well-being, yet socioeconomic disparities continue to shape who has access to these benefits. The 3 + 30 + 300 guideline aims to reduce this inequity by promoting visible, available, and accessible green for all residents. This study assesses these components of green exposure across Flanders, Belgium, one of the most densely populated and highly urbanized regions in Western Europe, and examines how they intersect with multiple dimensions of socioeconomic deprivation, namely sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Using 264,622 building-level sample points, we quantified tree visibility from street-view imagery, tree canopy cover, and network distance to accessible green space. Median values of 5.0 (urban) and 6.0 (rural) visible trees, 16.1 % (urban) and 12.4 % (rural) canopy cover, and distances of 367 (urban) and 548 (rural) meters to accessible green were observed. Deprived neighborhoods, particularly those characterized by housing and health deprivation, showed the highest sensitivity to lack of green spaces, while areas with more elderly and higher-income residents had consistently greater exposure. These results suggest that green exposure and socioeconomic susceptibility intersect and reinforce one another, producing compounded distributive injustice. The findings highlight the need for equity-oriented interpretation and implementation of the 3 + 30 + 300 guideline and call for targeted greening strategies that address structural environmental and health inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 129301"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866726000415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Green space offers numerous benefits for health and well-being, yet socioeconomic disparities continue to shape who has access to these benefits. The 3 + 30 + 300 guideline aims to reduce this inequity by promoting visible, available, and accessible green for all residents. This study assesses these components of green exposure across Flanders, Belgium, one of the most densely populated and highly urbanized regions in Western Europe, and examines how they intersect with multiple dimensions of socioeconomic deprivation, namely sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Using 264,622 building-level sample points, we quantified tree visibility from street-view imagery, tree canopy cover, and network distance to accessible green space. Median values of 5.0 (urban) and 6.0 (rural) visible trees, 16.1 % (urban) and 12.4 % (rural) canopy cover, and distances of 367 (urban) and 548 (rural) meters to accessible green were observed. Deprived neighborhoods, particularly those characterized by housing and health deprivation, showed the highest sensitivity to lack of green spaces, while areas with more elderly and higher-income residents had consistently greater exposure. These results suggest that green exposure and socioeconomic susceptibility intersect and reinforce one another, producing compounded distributive injustice. The findings highlight the need for equity-oriented interpretation and implementation of the 3 + 30 + 300 guideline and call for targeted greening strategies that address structural environmental and health inequalities.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.