Socioeconomic inequities in visible, functional, and accessible green space exposure: A cross-sectional study in Flanders, Belgium

IF 8.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2026.129301
Melissa K. Lee , Eline Rega , Maarten Loopmans , Martina Otavova , Jos Van Orshoven , Raf Aerts , Ben Somers
{"title":"Socioeconomic inequities in visible, functional, and accessible green space exposure: A cross-sectional study in Flanders, Belgium","authors":"Melissa K. Lee ,&nbsp;Eline Rega ,&nbsp;Maarten Loopmans ,&nbsp;Martina Otavova ,&nbsp;Jos Van Orshoven ,&nbsp;Raf Aerts ,&nbsp;Ben Somers","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2026.129301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green space offers numerous benefits for health and well-being, yet socioeconomic disparities continue to shape who has access to these benefits. The 3 + 30 + 300 guideline aims to reduce this inequity by promoting visible, available, and accessible green for all residents. This study assesses these components of green exposure across Flanders, Belgium, one of the most densely populated and highly urbanized regions in Western Europe, and examines how they intersect with multiple dimensions of socioeconomic deprivation, namely sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Using 264,622 building-level sample points, we quantified tree visibility from street-view imagery, tree canopy cover, and network distance to accessible green space. Median values of 5.0 (urban) and 6.0 (rural) visible trees, 16.1 % (urban) and 12.4 % (rural) canopy cover, and distances of 367 (urban) and 548 (rural) meters to accessible green were observed. Deprived neighborhoods, particularly those characterized by housing and health deprivation, showed the highest sensitivity to lack of green spaces, while areas with more elderly and higher-income residents had consistently greater exposure. These results suggest that green exposure and socioeconomic susceptibility intersect and reinforce one another, producing compounded distributive injustice. The findings highlight the need for equity-oriented interpretation and implementation of the 3 + 30 + 300 guideline and call for targeted greening strategies that address structural environmental and health inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 129301"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866726000415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green space offers numerous benefits for health and well-being, yet socioeconomic disparities continue to shape who has access to these benefits. The 3 + 30 + 300 guideline aims to reduce this inequity by promoting visible, available, and accessible green for all residents. This study assesses these components of green exposure across Flanders, Belgium, one of the most densely populated and highly urbanized regions in Western Europe, and examines how they intersect with multiple dimensions of socioeconomic deprivation, namely sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Using 264,622 building-level sample points, we quantified tree visibility from street-view imagery, tree canopy cover, and network distance to accessible green space. Median values of 5.0 (urban) and 6.0 (rural) visible trees, 16.1 % (urban) and 12.4 % (rural) canopy cover, and distances of 367 (urban) and 548 (rural) meters to accessible green were observed. Deprived neighborhoods, particularly those characterized by housing and health deprivation, showed the highest sensitivity to lack of green spaces, while areas with more elderly and higher-income residents had consistently greater exposure. These results suggest that green exposure and socioeconomic susceptibility intersect and reinforce one another, producing compounded distributive injustice. The findings highlight the need for equity-oriented interpretation and implementation of the 3 + 30 + 300 guideline and call for targeted greening strategies that address structural environmental and health inequalities.
可见、功能和可达绿地暴露中的社会经济不平等:比利时法兰德斯的横断面研究
绿色空间为健康和福祉提供了许多好处,但社会经济差距继续影响谁可以获得这些好处。3 + 30 + 300指导方针旨在通过促进所有居民可见、可用和可及的绿色来减少这种不平等。本研究评估了西欧人口最密集和城市化程度最高的地区之一比利时法兰德斯的绿色暴露的这些组成部分,并研究了它们如何与社会经济剥夺的多个维度(即敏感性和适应能力)相交。利用264,622个建筑级别的样本点,我们量化了街景图像、树冠覆盖和网络距离到可达绿地的树木可见性。可见树木的中值分别为5.0(城市)和6.0(农村),林冠覆盖率的中值分别为16.1 %(城市)和12.4 %(农村),距离可达绿地的中值分别为367米(城市)和548米(农村)。贫困社区,特别是那些以住房和健康剥夺为特征的社区,对缺乏绿色空间表现出最高的敏感性,而老年人较多和居民收入较高的地区,对绿色空间的暴露程度一直较高。这些结果表明,绿色暴露和社会经济敏感性相互交叉并相互加强,产生了复杂的分配不公平。研究结果强调需要以公平为导向解释和实施3 + 30 + 300指南,并呼吁制定有针对性的绿化战略,解决结构性环境和健康不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书