Assessment of Bottom Trawl Impacts on the Status of Seabed Communities in European Seas

IF 6.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Jan Geert Hiddink, Sebastian Valanko, Luke Batts, Esther D. Beukhof, Mats Blomqvist, Stefan Bolam, Belén Calero, Michele Casini, Marina Delgado, Jochen Depestele, Joanna Desmidt, Gabriele Di Bona, Bianca Di Lorenzo, Grete E. Dinesen, Gianfranco D'Onghia, Josefine Egekvist, Emanuela Fanelli, Maria Teresa Farriols, Gianluca Franceschini, Juan Gil, José Manuel González-Irusta, Pascal Laffargue, Irida Maina, Porzia Maiorano, Renato Mamede, Maria Cristina Mangano, Alessandra Nguyen Xuan, Nadia Papadopoulou, Marina Penna, Andrea Pierucci, Marina Pulcini, Sasa Raicevich, Arnold Rakaj, Sofia Reizopoulou, Giada Riva, Tommaso Russo, Antonello Sala, Gianluca Sarà, Alice Sbrana, Giuseppe Scarcella, Marija Sciberras, Mattias Sköld, Chris J. Smith, Ignacio Sobrino, Maria Teresa Spedicato, Valentina Todorova, Irini Tsikopoulou, Karin J. van der Reijden, Sandrine Vaz, Cristina Vina-Herbon, Nedo Vrgoc, Katherine Wright, Wenyan Zhang, Walter Zupa, Gert van Hoey, Ole Ritzau Eigaard, Tobias van Kooten, P. Daniël van Denderen
{"title":"Assessment of Bottom Trawl Impacts on the Status of Seabed Communities in European Seas","authors":"Jan Geert Hiddink,&nbsp;Sebastian Valanko,&nbsp;Luke Batts,&nbsp;Esther D. Beukhof,&nbsp;Mats Blomqvist,&nbsp;Stefan Bolam,&nbsp;Belén Calero,&nbsp;Michele Casini,&nbsp;Marina Delgado,&nbsp;Jochen Depestele,&nbsp;Joanna Desmidt,&nbsp;Gabriele Di Bona,&nbsp;Bianca Di Lorenzo,&nbsp;Grete E. Dinesen,&nbsp;Gianfranco D'Onghia,&nbsp;Josefine Egekvist,&nbsp;Emanuela Fanelli,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Farriols,&nbsp;Gianluca Franceschini,&nbsp;Juan Gil,&nbsp;José Manuel González-Irusta,&nbsp;Pascal Laffargue,&nbsp;Irida Maina,&nbsp;Porzia Maiorano,&nbsp;Renato Mamede,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Mangano,&nbsp;Alessandra Nguyen Xuan,&nbsp;Nadia Papadopoulou,&nbsp;Marina Penna,&nbsp;Andrea Pierucci,&nbsp;Marina Pulcini,&nbsp;Sasa Raicevich,&nbsp;Arnold Rakaj,&nbsp;Sofia Reizopoulou,&nbsp;Giada Riva,&nbsp;Tommaso Russo,&nbsp;Antonello Sala,&nbsp;Gianluca Sarà,&nbsp;Alice Sbrana,&nbsp;Giuseppe Scarcella,&nbsp;Marija Sciberras,&nbsp;Mattias Sköld,&nbsp;Chris J. Smith,&nbsp;Ignacio Sobrino,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Spedicato,&nbsp;Valentina Todorova,&nbsp;Irini Tsikopoulou,&nbsp;Karin J. van der Reijden,&nbsp;Sandrine Vaz,&nbsp;Cristina Vina-Herbon,&nbsp;Nedo Vrgoc,&nbsp;Katherine Wright,&nbsp;Wenyan Zhang,&nbsp;Walter Zupa,&nbsp;Gert van Hoey,&nbsp;Ole Ritzau Eigaard,&nbsp;Tobias van Kooten,&nbsp;P. Daniël van Denderen","doi":"10.1111/faf.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bottom trawling affects seabed habitats, but its large-scale impacts remain poorly quantified. Assessment of trawling impacts is essential to support monitoring and achieving sustainability objectives under international conventions, sustainable development goals, and seafood certification programs. We present a Europe-wide quantitative assessment of bottom trawling impacts, accounting for regional seabed-community sensitivity drivers, across the Baltic, Atlantic, Mediterranean and Black Sea continental shelves. Using two risk-based indicators of seabed status—Relative Benthic Status determined as benthic community biomass relative to seabed fauna carrying capacity (RBS<sub>tot</sub>) and RBS<sub>sen</sub> (biomass of the 10% most sensitive fauna relative to carrying capacity)—we found substantial regional and habitat differences. The Black, Baltic and Aegean-Levantine Seas showed low trawling intensity and high seabed status across habitats. In contrast, the Western Mediterranean, Ionian and Central Mediterranean and Adriatic Seas were the most severely impacted. Trawling affected the sensitive species biomass fraction more strongly than the total community biomass. RBS<sub>tot</sub> was in good condition (here chosen as RBS &gt; 75% for epifauna) for over 79% of habitat-ecoregion combinations. In contrast, RBS<sub>sen</sub> met this threshold in only 46% of these. A strong correlation emerged between the mean trawling intensity and RBS<sub>tot</sub> and RBS<sub>sen</sub>, allowing the use of SAR to estimate ecosystem status. This relationship can support decisions on where, and by how much, SAR reductions are needed to achieve good environmental status in regions where no detailed assessment is available. Our approach provides a quantitative framework to balance fishery production with ecosystem sustainability, offering tools for environmental and fisheries management in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"27 2","pages":"285-299"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.70054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.70054","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bottom trawling affects seabed habitats, but its large-scale impacts remain poorly quantified. Assessment of trawling impacts is essential to support monitoring and achieving sustainability objectives under international conventions, sustainable development goals, and seafood certification programs. We present a Europe-wide quantitative assessment of bottom trawling impacts, accounting for regional seabed-community sensitivity drivers, across the Baltic, Atlantic, Mediterranean and Black Sea continental shelves. Using two risk-based indicators of seabed status—Relative Benthic Status determined as benthic community biomass relative to seabed fauna carrying capacity (RBStot) and RBSsen (biomass of the 10% most sensitive fauna relative to carrying capacity)—we found substantial regional and habitat differences. The Black, Baltic and Aegean-Levantine Seas showed low trawling intensity and high seabed status across habitats. In contrast, the Western Mediterranean, Ionian and Central Mediterranean and Adriatic Seas were the most severely impacted. Trawling affected the sensitive species biomass fraction more strongly than the total community biomass. RBStot was in good condition (here chosen as RBS > 75% for epifauna) for over 79% of habitat-ecoregion combinations. In contrast, RBSsen met this threshold in only 46% of these. A strong correlation emerged between the mean trawling intensity and RBStot and RBSsen, allowing the use of SAR to estimate ecosystem status. This relationship can support decisions on where, and by how much, SAR reductions are needed to achieve good environmental status in regions where no detailed assessment is available. Our approach provides a quantitative framework to balance fishery production with ecosystem sustainability, offering tools for environmental and fisheries management in Europe.

Abstract Image

欧洲海域底拖网对海底群落状况影响的评估
海底拖网捕捞影响海底栖息地,但其大规模影响仍缺乏量化。拖网捕捞影响评估对于支持监测和实现国际公约、可持续发展目标和海产品认证计划规定的可持续性目标至关重要。我们提出了一项全欧洲范围的海底拖网捕捞影响定量评估,考虑了波罗的海、大西洋、地中海和黑海大陆架的区域海底群落敏感性驱动因素。利用海底状态的两个基于风险的指标——底栖生物相对状态,即底栖生物群落生物量相对于海底动物承载能力(RBS tot)和RBS sen(10%最敏感动物相对于承载能力的生物量)——我们发现了实质性的区域和栖息地差异。黑海、波罗的海和爱琴海-黎凡特海各生境拖网捕捞强度低,海床状况高。相比之下,西地中海、爱奥尼亚海、中地中海和亚得里亚海受到的影响最为严重。拖网捕捞对敏感物种生物量的影响大于对群落总生物量的影响。在超过79%的生境-生态区组合中,RBS的状况良好(这里表生动物的RBS >; 75%)。相比之下,苏格兰皇家银行只有46%达到了这一门槛。平均拖网捕捞强度与RBS tot和RBS sen之间存在很强的相关性,允许使用SAR来估计生态系统状况。这种关系可以帮助决定在没有详细评估的地区,需要在何处以及减少多少SAR才能达到良好的环境状况。我们的方法为平衡渔业生产与生态系统可持续性提供了定量框架,为欧洲的环境和渔业管理提供了工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书