{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Liposomal vs. Conventional Bupivacaine Erector Spinae Plane Block Plus Gabapentin for Postherpetic Neuralgia.","authors":"Xia-Jing Xu, Li-Juan Liu, Fa-Ming Xu, Xiang-Yu Fang","doi":"10.1002/kjm2.70169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) using liposomal (LB) versus conventional bupivacaine (CB), each plus standardized gabapentin, in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). A total of 116 PHN patients were randomized to ESPB-LB or ESPB-CB; both groups received standardized gabapentin. The primary outcome was resting pain assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were 72-h event-free time (time to first rescue medication or resting NRS ≥ 4), cumulative rescue opioid exposure in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), sleep by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), health-related quality of life by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and adverse events (AEs). ESPB-LB achieved lower resting NRS at day 1, day 3 and day 7 (all p < 0.05), with no between-group differences at day 30 or day 60. Event-free time favored LB (median 54.10 h vs. 18.95 h; log-rank p = 0.002). LB reduced cumulative MME at 48 h and 72 h, with convergence by days 7-60. PGIC favored LB at days 7 and 30, converging by day 60. Sleep and health-related quality of life improved similarly with no between-group differences; AEs were comparable, and no serious events occurred through day 60. In PHN, ESPB-LB plus gabapentin provided an early advantage characterized by superior early analgesia, higher early responder rates, longer opioid-free analgesia within 72 h, and short-term opioid sparing versus ESPB-CB, while longer-term outcomes and safety profiles were similar between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94244,"journal":{"name":"The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"e70169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13399767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.70169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) using liposomal (LB) versus conventional bupivacaine (CB), each plus standardized gabapentin, in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). A total of 116 PHN patients were randomized to ESPB-LB or ESPB-CB; both groups received standardized gabapentin. The primary outcome was resting pain assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were 72-h event-free time (time to first rescue medication or resting NRS ≥ 4), cumulative rescue opioid exposure in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), sleep by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), health-related quality of life by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and adverse events (AEs). ESPB-LB achieved lower resting NRS at day 1, day 3 and day 7 (all p < 0.05), with no between-group differences at day 30 or day 60. Event-free time favored LB (median 54.10 h vs. 18.95 h; log-rank p = 0.002). LB reduced cumulative MME at 48 h and 72 h, with convergence by days 7-60. PGIC favored LB at days 7 and 30, converging by day 60. Sleep and health-related quality of life improved similarly with no between-group differences; AEs were comparable, and no serious events occurred through day 60. In PHN, ESPB-LB plus gabapentin provided an early advantage characterized by superior early analgesia, higher early responder rates, longer opioid-free analgesia within 72 h, and short-term opioid sparing versus ESPB-CB, while longer-term outcomes and safety profiles were similar between groups.