Applicability of thoracic ultrasound for the assessment of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: a systematic review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Sanjeewa Patabendige, Casper Falster, Henrik Z Langkilde, Stefan M W Harders, Elisabeth Bendstrup, Michael T Durheim, Jesper Rømhild Davidsen
{"title":"Applicability of thoracic ultrasound for the assessment of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: a systematic review.","authors":"Sanjeewa Patabendige, Casper Falster, Henrik Z Langkilde, Stefan M W Harders, Elisabeth Bendstrup, Michael T Durheim, Jesper Rømhild Davidsen","doi":"10.1055/a-2785-1857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILD), which include idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other ILDs conferring risk for progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), are a heterogeneous group of diseases with multiple subtypes. A multidisciplinary team discussion (MDD) incorporating HRCT is considered the gold standard for diagnosing and quantifying pulmonary fibrosis. However, repeated HRCTs are associated with substantial costs and radiation exposure. Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) has emerged as a potential radiation-free method for diagnosing and monitoring disease severity in F-ILD. However, consistent knowledge regarding the use of TUS in patients with F-ILD remains limited. This systematic review aimed to evaluate existing literature on the applicability of TUS in patients with F-ILD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane library databases were searched. Prospective, cross-sectional, and retrospective studies were considered. Risk of bias was assessed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met the inclusion criteria. All examined patients had IPF, and two had other F-ILD subtypes. The most frequently evaluated TUS findings were B-lines and pleural line irregularities (PI). However, there was marked heterogeneity in TUS methodology and protocols, precluding meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the preliminary findings in this review suggest TUS may have potential utility in this patient group, available data on TUS in F-ILD are sparse and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49400,"journal":{"name":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2785-1857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILD), which include idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other ILDs conferring risk for progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), are a heterogeneous group of diseases with multiple subtypes. A multidisciplinary team discussion (MDD) incorporating HRCT is considered the gold standard for diagnosing and quantifying pulmonary fibrosis. However, repeated HRCTs are associated with substantial costs and radiation exposure. Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) has emerged as a potential radiation-free method for diagnosing and monitoring disease severity in F-ILD. However, consistent knowledge regarding the use of TUS in patients with F-ILD remains limited. This systematic review aimed to evaluate existing literature on the applicability of TUS in patients with F-ILD.

Materials and methods: We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane library databases were searched. Prospective, cross-sectional, and retrospective studies were considered. Risk of bias was assessed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2).

Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. All examined patients had IPF, and two had other F-ILD subtypes. The most frequently evaluated TUS findings were B-lines and pleural line irregularities (PI). However, there was marked heterogeneity in TUS methodology and protocols, precluding meta-analysis.

Conclusion: Although the preliminary findings in this review suggest TUS may have potential utility in this patient group, available data on TUS in F-ILD are sparse and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for further research.

胸部超声在评估纤维化间质性肺疾病患者中的适用性:一项系统综述。
目的:纤维化间质性肺病(F-ILD),包括特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和其他具有进行性肺纤维化(PPF)风险的ild,是一组具有多种亚型的异质性疾病。结合HRCT的多学科小组讨论(MDD)被认为是诊断和量化肺纤维化的金标准。然而,重复的hrct与大量的费用和辐射暴露有关。胸部超声(TUS)已成为一种潜在的无辐射诊断和监测F-ILD疾病严重程度的方法。然而,关于在F-ILD患者中使用TUS的一致知识仍然有限。本系统综述旨在评价现有文献中关于us在F-ILD患者中的适用性。材料和方法:我们根据PRISMA指南进行了系统评价。检索MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆数据库。考虑了前瞻性、横断面和回顾性研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2 (QUADAS-2)评估偏倚风险。结果:6项研究符合纳入标准。所有IPF患者均接受了检查,其中2例包括其他F-ILD亚型。最常见的检查结果是b线和胸膜线不规则。然而,在TUS方法和方案中存在明显的异质性,因此无法进行meta分析。结论:尽管本综述的初步结果表明TUS可能在该患者组中具有潜在的效用,但关于F-ILD中TUS的可用数据较少且不均匀,因此需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultraschall in Der Medizin
Ultraschall in Der Medizin 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultraschall in der Medizin / European Journal of Ultrasound publishes scientific papers and contributions from a variety of disciplines on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound with an emphasis on clinical application. Technical papers with a physiological theme as well as the interaction between ultrasound and biological systems might also occasionally be considered for peer review and publication, provided that the translational relevance is high and the link with clinical applications is tight. The editors and the publishers reserve the right to publish selected articles online only. Authors are welcome to submit supplementary video material. Letters and comments are also accepted, promoting a vivid exchange of opinions and scientific discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书