Machine learning prediction of dementia conversion in mild cognitive impairment: A two- to six-year follow-up study.

IF 3 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Valgeir Thorvaldsson, Johan Svensson, Emir Basic, Michael Jonsson, Petronella Kettunen, Anders Wallin
{"title":"Machine learning prediction of dementia conversion in mild cognitive impairment: A two- to six-year follow-up study.","authors":"Valgeir Thorvaldsson, Johan Svensson, Emir Basic, Michael Jonsson, Petronella Kettunen, Anders Wallin","doi":"10.1017/S135561772510177X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) involves measurable cognitive decline that does not yet significantly disrupt daily functioning but may signal increased risk of dementia. Reliable prediction of dementia conversion in MCI is essential for early intervention and optimized clinical trial design. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of various machine learning (ML) classification algorithms using clinical and neuropsychological data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the Gothenburg MCI Study and included 347 patients from a memory clinic, of whom 84 (24%) converted to dementia within two to six years. We applied 11 ML classification algorithms (logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbors, LASSO, ridge regression, elastic net, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, and support vector machine (SVM)) to predict dementia conversion based on 54 clinical predictors (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, neuropsychological test scores, comorbidities, and demographics). In a second step, we included delta scores reflecting change in neuropsychological test performance from baseline to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without delta scores, LASSO, ridge, elastic net, random forest, and SVM performed best, achieving accuracy ≥0.87, kappa = 0.64, and AUC-ROC ≥0.90. These models demonstrated high specificity (0.94) but moderate sensitivity (0.68). Including delta scores improved performance, with ridge and elastic net achieving accuracy = 0.90, kappa = 0.73 and 0.72, AUC-ROC = 0.94, specificity = 0.96, and sensitivity = 0.73. The elastic net model yielded a positive predictive value of 0.85 and a negative predictive value of 0.92.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML models incorporating clinical and cognitive change data can accurately predict dementia conversion in MCI, supporting their utility in clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"11-23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561772510177X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) involves measurable cognitive decline that does not yet significantly disrupt daily functioning but may signal increased risk of dementia. Reliable prediction of dementia conversion in MCI is essential for early intervention and optimized clinical trial design. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of various machine learning (ML) classification algorithms using clinical and neuropsychological data.

Methods: Data were drawn from the Gothenburg MCI Study and included 347 patients from a memory clinic, of whom 84 (24%) converted to dementia within two to six years. We applied 11 ML classification algorithms (logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbors, LASSO, ridge regression, elastic net, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, and support vector machine (SVM)) to predict dementia conversion based on 54 clinical predictors (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, neuropsychological test scores, comorbidities, and demographics). In a second step, we included delta scores reflecting change in neuropsychological test performance from baseline to follow-up.

Results: Without delta scores, LASSO, ridge, elastic net, random forest, and SVM performed best, achieving accuracy ≥0.87, kappa = 0.64, and AUC-ROC ≥0.90. These models demonstrated high specificity (0.94) but moderate sensitivity (0.68). Including delta scores improved performance, with ridge and elastic net achieving accuracy = 0.90, kappa = 0.73 and 0.72, AUC-ROC = 0.94, specificity = 0.96, and sensitivity = 0.73. The elastic net model yielded a positive predictive value of 0.85 and a negative predictive value of 0.92.

Conclusions: ML models incorporating clinical and cognitive change data can accurately predict dementia conversion in MCI, supporting their utility in clinical decision-making.

轻度认知障碍患者痴呆转化的机器学习预测:一项2至6年的随访研究。
目的:轻度认知障碍(MCI)涉及可测量的认知能力下降,尚未显著破坏日常功能,但可能表明痴呆风险增加。MCI患者痴呆转化的可靠预测对于早期干预和优化临床试验设计至关重要。本研究旨在利用临床和神经心理学数据评估各种机器学习(ML)分类算法的预测性能。方法:数据来自哥德堡MCI研究,包括来自记忆诊所的347例患者,其中84例(24%)在2至6年内转化为痴呆。我们应用了11种ML分类算法(逻辑回归、线性判别分析、naïve贝叶斯、k近邻、LASSO、脊回归、弹性网、决策树、随机森林、梯度增强和支持向量机(SVM))来预测基于54个临床预测因子(例如脑脊液生物标志物、神经心理测试分数、合并症和人口统计学)的痴呆转换。第二步,我们纳入反映从基线到随访期间神经心理测试表现变化的delta分数。结果:无delta评分时,LASSO、ridge、elastic net、random forest和SVM表现最佳,准确率≥0.87,kappa = 0.64, AUC-ROC≥0.90。这些模型具有高特异性(0.94)和中等敏感性(0.68)。纳入delta评分可提高性能,脊网和弹性网的准确率分别为0.90,kappa分别为0.73和0.72,AUC-ROC = 0.94,特异性= 0.96,敏感性= 0.73。弹性网模型的正预测值为0.85,负预测值为0.92。结论:结合临床和认知变化数据的ML模型可以准确预测MCI的痴呆转化,支持其在临床决策中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书