Patient Satisfaction, Oral Health-related Quality of Life, and Masticatory Efficiency of Bar-retained Implant-supported Mandibular Overdentures with Reduced Denture Base Extensions.

Q3 Dentistry
Abdallah M Ibrahim, Mohammed M Alokda, Mohamed Elgamal
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction, Oral Health-related Quality of Life, and Masticatory Efficiency of Bar-retained Implant-supported Mandibular Overdentures with Reduced Denture Base Extensions.","authors":"Abdallah M Ibrahim, Mohammed M Alokda, Mohamed Elgamal","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to compare the design of reduced extended denture bases (RIOD) with that of fully extended denture bases for implant overdentures (FIODs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A within-subject study design was carried out, involving 20 completely edentulous participants aged from 50 to 70 years who received newly constructed complete dentures. Four parallel implants were installed in the interforaminal region according to a guided surgical and delayed loading protocol. Each participant was provided with an implant overdenture (IOD) retained by a bar attachment and two different overdenture designs: Firstly, an FIOD, then an RIOD. Each participant wore each type of overdenture for a period of 3 months prior to evaluation. The following outcome measures were evaluated: Patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and chewing efficiency. Comparison of outcome scores between the two occasions was done using paired sample <i>t</i>-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RIOD design exhibited significantly higher scores in certain domains of patient satisfaction, such as comfort, function, and overall satisfaction compared to the FIOD design. However, the OHRQoL scores were significantly lower (a higher quality of life) for the RIOD design in all domains, including functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap. Additionally, the RIOD design exhibited significantly higher chewing efficiency compared to the FIOD design (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RIOD design may be a more favorable option in cases where mandibular implant-supported overdentures are indicated, providing a better balance of comfort and function compared to FIOD.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Clinicians should carefully consider the advantages of reduced extensions when designing mandibular implant-supported overdentures, as this may be a more beneficial choice for patients in terms of improving their overall experience and functional performance. How to cite this article: Ibrahim AM, Alokda MM, Elgamal M. Patient Satisfaction, Oral Health-related Quality of Life, and Masticatory Efficiency of Bar-retained Implant-supported Mandibular Overdentures with Reduced Denture Base Extensions. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(10):988-995.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 10","pages":"988-995"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to compare the design of reduced extended denture bases (RIOD) with that of fully extended denture bases for implant overdentures (FIODs).

Materials and methods: A within-subject study design was carried out, involving 20 completely edentulous participants aged from 50 to 70 years who received newly constructed complete dentures. Four parallel implants were installed in the interforaminal region according to a guided surgical and delayed loading protocol. Each participant was provided with an implant overdenture (IOD) retained by a bar attachment and two different overdenture designs: Firstly, an FIOD, then an RIOD. Each participant wore each type of overdenture for a period of 3 months prior to evaluation. The following outcome measures were evaluated: Patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and chewing efficiency. Comparison of outcome scores between the two occasions was done using paired sample t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: The RIOD design exhibited significantly higher scores in certain domains of patient satisfaction, such as comfort, function, and overall satisfaction compared to the FIOD design. However, the OHRQoL scores were significantly lower (a higher quality of life) for the RIOD design in all domains, including functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap. Additionally, the RIOD design exhibited significantly higher chewing efficiency compared to the FIOD design (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The RIOD design may be a more favorable option in cases where mandibular implant-supported overdentures are indicated, providing a better balance of comfort and function compared to FIOD.

Clinical significance: Clinicians should carefully consider the advantages of reduced extensions when designing mandibular implant-supported overdentures, as this may be a more beneficial choice for patients in terms of improving their overall experience and functional performance. How to cite this article: Ibrahim AM, Alokda MM, Elgamal M. Patient Satisfaction, Oral Health-related Quality of Life, and Masticatory Efficiency of Bar-retained Implant-supported Mandibular Overdentures with Reduced Denture Base Extensions. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(10):988-995.

患者满意度、口腔健康相关生活质量和下颌种植覆盖义齿义齿基托延伸的咀嚼效率
目的:比较种植覆盖义齿(FIODs)的全扩展义齿基托和义齿复位延伸基托的设计。材料和方法:采用受试者内研究设计,纳入20名年龄在50 - 70岁之间的完全无牙者,接受新制作的全口义齿。根据引导手术和延迟加载协议,在椎间孔区安装4个平行植入物。每个参与者都提供了种植覆盖义齿(IOD),由棒状附着体保留,并有两种不同的覆盖义齿设计:第一种是FIOD,然后是RIOD。每位参与者在评估前佩戴每种类型的覆盖义齿3个月。评估了以下结局指标:患者满意度、口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)和咀嚼效率。两种情况的结局评分比较采用配对样本t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验,显著性设置为p < 0.05。结果:与FIOD设计相比,RIOD设计在患者满意度的某些领域(如舒适度、功能和总体满意度)表现出明显更高的分数。然而,在所有领域,包括功能限制、身体疼痛、心理不适、身体残疾、心理残疾、社会残疾和残疾,RIOD设计的OHRQoL得分明显较低(生活质量较高)。此外,RIOD设计的咀嚼效率显著高于FIOD设计(p < 0.05)。结论:与FIOD相比,RIOD设计可以更好地平衡下颌种植覆盖义齿的舒适性和功能,是下颌种植覆盖义齿的理想选择。临床意义:临床医生在设计下颌种植覆盖义齿时应仔细考虑下颌种植覆盖义齿的缩位优势,因为在改善患者的整体体验和功能表现方面,这可能是一个更有益的选择。Ibrahim AM, Alokda MM, Elgamal M.患者满意度、口腔健康相关生活质量和下颌覆盖义齿义齿基托延伸的咀嚼效率。[J]现代医学学报;2009;26(10):988-995。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书