Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Curvature Measurement Methods for Permanent Mandibular Molars Distal Root: An Observational Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Tanu Singh, Saurav Bathla, Anuraag Gurtu, Shubhi Gupta, Sana Saifi, Madhusudan Astekar
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Curvature Measurement Methods for Permanent Mandibular Molars Distal Root: An Observational Study.","authors":"Tanu Singh, Saurav Bathla, Anuraag Gurtu, Shubhi Gupta, Sana Saifi, Madhusudan Astekar","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study's objective was to measure the root canal curvature of the mandibular molars distal root using three distinct methods based on periapical radiography evaluation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Teeth from the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) department that were extracted due to a poor prognosis because of dental caries and severe periodontal disease were collected. Six hundred human mandibular molars were used in this study. Curvature angles of the distal root were measured using three different methods, Schneider's, Weine, and long (LA) axis techniques, in the mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) dimensions using periapical x-ray, and the results were digitalized on a computer and statistically compared. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that the curvature angle values calculated with each method differed significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of curvature angle values in MD dimensions by using Schneider's technique were 15.24° (±13.07), in Weine's technique were 21.15° (± 20.05), and in the LA axis technique were 27.76° (±27.76). Mean curvature angle values using BL dimensions in Schneider's technique were 11.01° (±6.66), in Weine's technique were 16.24° (±10.81), and in the LA axis technique were 14.40° (±11.71). Significant differences were found in mean curvature angle values using MD and BL measurements across techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long axis technique recorded the highest mean curvature angle in MD dimensions, followed by Weine's and Schneider's. The highest mean curvature angle values using the BL dimension were recorded by Weine's technique. All differences were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The knowledge of root canal curvature is crucial regarding the prevention of ledge formation, root perforation, and the possibility of endodontic instruments fracture during endodontic treatments. Failing to realize the curvature of the canal before treatment can leave the canal unprepared and compromise the outcome of the treatment. Therefore, a quantification method of the root canal curvature, as well as the applicability of these methods, is necessary. How to cite this article: Singh T, Bathla S, Gurtu A, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Curvature Measurement Methods for Permanent Mandibular Molars Distal Root: An Observational Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(10):945-949.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 10","pages":"945-949"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study's objective was to measure the root canal curvature of the mandibular molars distal root using three distinct methods based on periapical radiography evaluation.

Materials and methods: Teeth from the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) department that were extracted due to a poor prognosis because of dental caries and severe periodontal disease were collected. Six hundred human mandibular molars were used in this study. Curvature angles of the distal root were measured using three different methods, Schneider's, Weine, and long (LA) axis techniques, in the mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) dimensions using periapical x-ray, and the results were digitalized on a computer and statistically compared. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that the curvature angle values calculated with each method differed significantly (p < 0.001).

Results: Comparison of curvature angle values in MD dimensions by using Schneider's technique were 15.24° (±13.07), in Weine's technique were 21.15° (± 20.05), and in the LA axis technique were 27.76° (±27.76). Mean curvature angle values using BL dimensions in Schneider's technique were 11.01° (±6.66), in Weine's technique were 16.24° (±10.81), and in the LA axis technique were 14.40° (±11.71). Significant differences were found in mean curvature angle values using MD and BL measurements across techniques.

Conclusion: Long axis technique recorded the highest mean curvature angle in MD dimensions, followed by Weine's and Schneider's. The highest mean curvature angle values using the BL dimension were recorded by Weine's technique. All differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Clinical significance: The knowledge of root canal curvature is crucial regarding the prevention of ledge formation, root perforation, and the possibility of endodontic instruments fracture during endodontic treatments. Failing to realize the curvature of the canal before treatment can leave the canal unprepared and compromise the outcome of the treatment. Therefore, a quantification method of the root canal curvature, as well as the applicability of these methods, is necessary. How to cite this article: Singh T, Bathla S, Gurtu A, et al. Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Curvature Measurement Methods for Permanent Mandibular Molars Distal Root: An Observational Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(10):945-949.

下颌恒磨牙远根根管曲率测量方法的比较分析:一项观察性研究。
背景:本研究的目的是测量下颌磨牙远端根的根管曲率,采用三种不同的方法基于根尖周放射学评估。材料和方法:收集口腔颌面外科(OMFS)因龋齿和严重牙周病预后不良而拔牙的患者。在这项研究中使用了600颗人类下颌磨牙。使用三种不同的方法,施耐德、Weine和长(LA)轴技术,在根尖周x射线的中远端(MD)和颊舌(BL)尺寸上测量远端根的曲率角,并将结果在计算机上数字化并进行统计比较。方差分析(ANOVA)表明,每种方法计算的曲率角值差异显著(p < 0.001)。结果:施耐德法和Weine法分别获得15.24°(±13.07)、21.15°(±20.05)和27.76°(±27.76)的MD维曲率角值。施耐德技术的平均曲率角为11.01°(±6.66),Weine技术为16.24°(±10.81),LA轴技术为14.40°(±11.71)。使用MD和BL测量不同技术的平均曲率角值存在显著差异。结论:长轴技术在MD维度上的平均曲率角最高,其次为Weine's和Schneider's。用Weine's技术记录了BL维的最高平均曲率角值。差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。临床意义:了解根管曲率对于预防根管治疗过程中凸壁形成、根管穿孔以及根管器械断裂的可能性至关重要。在治疗前没有意识到根管的曲率会使根管措手不及,从而影响治疗的结果。因此,需要一种量化根管曲率的方法,以及这些方法的适用性。本文引用方式:Singh T, Bathla S, Gurtu A等。下颌恒磨牙远根根管曲率测量方法的比较分析:一项观察性研究。[J]中国现代医学杂志,2015;26(10):945-949。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书