Is the Cognitive Remediation of Social Cognition (RC2S) program useful to improve social cognition and functional outcomes in people with schizophrenia? A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.2 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-12 DOI:10.1037/prj0000673
Elodie Peyroux, Zelda Prost, Isabelle Amado, Jérôme Graux, Caroline Demily, Julien Plasse, Nicolas Franck
{"title":"Is the Cognitive Remediation of Social Cognition (RC2S) program useful to improve social cognition and functional outcomes in people with schizophrenia? A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Elodie Peyroux, Zelda Prost, Isabelle Amado, Jérôme Graux, Caroline Demily, Julien Plasse, Nicolas Franck","doi":"10.1037/prj0000673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Difficulties in social interactions are a core characteristic of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. They are often linked to impairments in social cognition, including emotion recognition, social perception, theory of mind, and attributional style. The RC2S program (cognitive remediation of social cognition) aims to address these deficits through individualized interventions. This study is the first controlled randomized trial to compare RC2S with RECOS (Remédiation Cognitive pour la Schizophrénie ou un trouble associé), a neurocognitive remediation program, to evaluate their respective impacts. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Fifty-one outpatients with schizophrenia were randomized into RC2S (<i>n</i> = 25) or RECOS (<i>n</i> = 26) groups. The primary outcome was a measure of attributional biases, with secondary outcomes including symptom severity, social functioning, and cognitive measures. Assessments were conducted at baseline (T1), posttreatment (T2), and 3 month follow-up (T3). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Both groups improved significantly in social cognition and neurocognition, with no overall between-group differences. Yet only the RC2S group showed a significant reduction in hostile attribution bias from T1 to T2, a domain where many social cognitive trainings falter. RC2S also produced faster gains in negative symptoms and one area of social functioning. RECOS showed stronger effects on positive symptoms and certain neurocognitive measures. Both programs enhanced functional outcomes, though the trajectories of change differed. <b><i>Conclusions and Implications for Practice:</i></b> While the results highlight RC2S's potential, the small sample size, high dropout rate, and low baseline levels of hostility bias limit the generalizability and interpretability of these findings. Future research should refine RC2S, use more sensitive assessments, and explore broader applications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"153-164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000673","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Difficulties in social interactions are a core characteristic of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. They are often linked to impairments in social cognition, including emotion recognition, social perception, theory of mind, and attributional style. The RC2S program (cognitive remediation of social cognition) aims to address these deficits through individualized interventions. This study is the first controlled randomized trial to compare RC2S with RECOS (Remédiation Cognitive pour la Schizophrénie ou un trouble associé), a neurocognitive remediation program, to evaluate their respective impacts. Method: Fifty-one outpatients with schizophrenia were randomized into RC2S (n = 25) or RECOS (n = 26) groups. The primary outcome was a measure of attributional biases, with secondary outcomes including symptom severity, social functioning, and cognitive measures. Assessments were conducted at baseline (T1), posttreatment (T2), and 3 month follow-up (T3). Results: Both groups improved significantly in social cognition and neurocognition, with no overall between-group differences. Yet only the RC2S group showed a significant reduction in hostile attribution bias from T1 to T2, a domain where many social cognitive trainings falter. RC2S also produced faster gains in negative symptoms and one area of social functioning. RECOS showed stronger effects on positive symptoms and certain neurocognitive measures. Both programs enhanced functional outcomes, though the trajectories of change differed. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: While the results highlight RC2S's potential, the small sample size, high dropout rate, and low baseline levels of hostility bias limit the generalizability and interpretability of these findings. Future research should refine RC2S, use more sensitive assessments, and explore broader applications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

社会认知认知补救(RC2S)项目对改善精神分裂症患者的社会认知和功能结局有用吗?一项随机对照试验。
目的:社会交往困难是精神分裂症谱系障碍的核心特征。它们通常与社会认知障碍有关,包括情绪识别、社会知觉、心理理论和归因风格。RC2S项目(社会认知的认知补救)旨在通过个性化干预来解决这些缺陷。这项研究是第一个对照随机试验,比较RC2S和RECOS (remsamdiation Cognitive pour la schizophrenia - sancinie ou - trouble associes,一种神经认知修复计划),以评估它们各自的影响。方法:51例精神分裂症门诊患者随机分为RC2S组(n = 25)和RECOS组(n = 26)。主要结果是归因偏差的测量,次要结果包括症状严重程度、社会功能和认知测量。在基线(T1)、治疗后(T2)和3个月随访(T3)进行评估。结果:两组在社会认知和神经认知方面均有显著改善,组间差异无统计学意义。然而,从T1到T2,只有RC2S组表现出敌意归因偏见的显著减少,这是许多社会认知训练都无法做到的。RC2S在负面症状和一个社会功能领域也产生了更快的改善。RECOS对阳性症状和某些神经认知测量有更强的作用。这两个项目都提高了功能结果,尽管变化的轨迹不同。结论和对实践的启示:虽然结果突出了RC2S的潜力,但小样本量、高辍学率和低基线水平的敌意偏见限制了这些发现的普遍性和可解释性。未来的研究应该完善RC2S,使用更敏感的评估,并探索更广泛的应用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is sponsored by the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, at Boston University"s Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and by the US Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (USPRA) . The mission of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is to promote the development of new knowledge related to psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery of persons with serious mental illnesses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书