Measuring different types and domains of AI knowledge: Developing and validating a performance-based scale

IF 10.5 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Computers & Education Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105573
Inbal Klein-Avraham , Rut Ston , Osnat Atias , Ido Roll , Ayelet Baram-Tsabari
{"title":"Measuring different types and domains of AI knowledge: Developing and validating a performance-based scale","authors":"Inbal Klein-Avraham ,&nbsp;Rut Ston ,&nbsp;Osnat Atias ,&nbsp;Ido Roll ,&nbsp;Ayelet Baram-Tsabari","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GenAI) technologies become increasingly integrated into everyday life, the need for validated tools that measure people's knowledge about AI grows. Here, we present the development and validation of a theoretically driven, performance-based scale for assessing AI and GenAI knowledge. The scale is grounded in a two-axial framework. One axis captures three knowledge types: content knowledge (what AI is and where it is encountered), procedural knowledge (how AI systems operate and are used), and epistemic knowledge (what features and construction processes characterize AI outputs). The other axis encompasses three knowledge domains: technology-related knowledge (AI systems), user-related knowledge (users' interaction with AI), and society-related knowledge (the social and ethical implications of AI). Based on an online survey of 800 internet-using adults from Israel, the 26-item scale was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis, which demonstrated an acceptable model fit. It was further validated through two-stage structural equation modeling and group comparisons. Overall, the scale was found to be both valid and practically insightful: while it reproduces the expected relationships with additional constructs (e.g., trust in GenAI, attitudes toward AI) and expected differences between demographic groups, it also provides nuanced insights on the intricacies of AI knowledge. For example, the scale indicates that the relationship between trust in GenAI and knowledge about AI is grounded in both epistemic and societal knowledge. Thus, this novel tool affords more precise investigations into how different types and domains of AI knowledge relate to perceptions, behaviors, and decision-making in an AI-mediated world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 105573"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131526000114","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GenAI) technologies become increasingly integrated into everyday life, the need for validated tools that measure people's knowledge about AI grows. Here, we present the development and validation of a theoretically driven, performance-based scale for assessing AI and GenAI knowledge. The scale is grounded in a two-axial framework. One axis captures three knowledge types: content knowledge (what AI is and where it is encountered), procedural knowledge (how AI systems operate and are used), and epistemic knowledge (what features and construction processes characterize AI outputs). The other axis encompasses three knowledge domains: technology-related knowledge (AI systems), user-related knowledge (users' interaction with AI), and society-related knowledge (the social and ethical implications of AI). Based on an online survey of 800 internet-using adults from Israel, the 26-item scale was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis, which demonstrated an acceptable model fit. It was further validated through two-stage structural equation modeling and group comparisons. Overall, the scale was found to be both valid and practically insightful: while it reproduces the expected relationships with additional constructs (e.g., trust in GenAI, attitudes toward AI) and expected differences between demographic groups, it also provides nuanced insights on the intricacies of AI knowledge. For example, the scale indicates that the relationship between trust in GenAI and knowledge about AI is grounded in both epistemic and societal knowledge. Thus, this novel tool affords more precise investigations into how different types and domains of AI knowledge relate to perceptions, behaviors, and decision-making in an AI-mediated world.
衡量不同类型和领域的人工智能知识:开发和验证基于绩效的量表
随着人工智能(AI)和生成式人工智能(GenAI)技术越来越多地融入日常生活,对衡量人们对人工智能知识的有效工具的需求也在增长。在这里,我们提出了一个理论驱动的、基于绩效的评估AI和GenAI知识的量表的开发和验证。天平在一个双轴框架中接地。一个轴捕获三种知识类型:内容知识(人工智能是什么以及在哪里遇到它),程序知识(人工智能系统如何运行和使用)和认知知识(人工智能输出的特征和构建过程)。另一个轴包含三个知识领域:与技术相关的知识(人工智能系统),与用户相关的知识(用户与人工智能的交互)和与社会相关的知识(人工智能的社会和伦理影响)。基于对来自[国家]的800名上网成年人的在线调查,采用验证性因子分析对26项量表进行评估,结果表明模型拟合可接受。通过两阶段结构方程建模和分组比较进一步验证。总体而言,该量表被发现既有效又具有实际洞察力:虽然它再现了与其他结构(例如,对GenAI的信任,对AI的态度)的预期关系以及人口群体之间的预期差异,但它也提供了对AI知识复杂性的细致入微的见解。例如,该量表表明,对GenAI的信任与对AI的了解之间的关系建立在认知知识和社会知识的基础上。因此,这个新工具可以更精确地研究人工智能知识的不同类型和领域如何与人工智能介导的世界中的感知、行为和决策相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书