Matt R. Judah , Hannah C. Hamrick , Morgan S. Middlebrooks , Ben Swanson , Arooj Abid , Wesley J.B. Vaught
{"title":"Indirect effects of threat processing on worry: The roles of emotion dysregulation and contrast avoidance","authors":"Matt R. Judah , Hannah C. Hamrick , Morgan S. Middlebrooks , Ben Swanson , Arooj Abid , Wesley J.B. Vaught","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2026.113320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automatic attention to threat, known as attentional bias, is theorized to give rise to worry (Hirsch and Mathews, 2012). However, results have been equivocal regarding the link between worry and attentional bias as indicated by the late positive potential (LPP), a neural marker of attention. Additionally, theories suggest that emotion dysregulation and contrast avoidance may explain why attention to threat is related to worry. However, no studies have examined this or even determined whether there is an association between contrast avoidance and the LPP evoked by threat. To address these inconsistencies and gaps in the current research, the present study examined the associations between the early portion (400-700 ms) of the threat-evoked LPP, emotion dysregulation, contrast avoidance, and worry in a sample of 106 undergraduate students, 54.7% of whom endorsed clinically significant worry. Results indicated that the LPP was positively associated with both emotion dysregulation and contrast avoidance. Higher emotion dysregulation and higher contrast avoidance scores were associated with greater self-reported worry. There was an indirect effect of the LPP on worry through both emotion dysregulation and contrast avoidance. These results support a link between early attentional bias to threat and worry and suggest that clinicians should consider multiple mechanisms of pathological worry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 113320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876026000024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Automatic attention to threat, known as attentional bias, is theorized to give rise to worry (Hirsch and Mathews, 2012). However, results have been equivocal regarding the link between worry and attentional bias as indicated by the late positive potential (LPP), a neural marker of attention. Additionally, theories suggest that emotion dysregulation and contrast avoidance may explain why attention to threat is related to worry. However, no studies have examined this or even determined whether there is an association between contrast avoidance and the LPP evoked by threat. To address these inconsistencies and gaps in the current research, the present study examined the associations between the early portion (400-700 ms) of the threat-evoked LPP, emotion dysregulation, contrast avoidance, and worry in a sample of 106 undergraduate students, 54.7% of whom endorsed clinically significant worry. Results indicated that the LPP was positively associated with both emotion dysregulation and contrast avoidance. Higher emotion dysregulation and higher contrast avoidance scores were associated with greater self-reported worry. There was an indirect effect of the LPP on worry through both emotion dysregulation and contrast avoidance. These results support a link between early attentional bias to threat and worry and suggest that clinicians should consider multiple mechanisms of pathological worry.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas:
• Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies.
• Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes.
• Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration.
• Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.