Longitudinal Associations between Personality Traits and Cognitive Complaints in Midlife and Older Age Across 20 Years.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
European Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1177/08902070241272247
Damaris Aschwanden, Mathias Allemand, Matthias Kliegel, Angelina R Sutin, Martina Luchetti, Yannick Stephan, Oliver Schilling, Hans-Werner Wahl, Gabriel Olaru, Antonio Terracciano
{"title":"Longitudinal Associations between Personality Traits and Cognitive Complaints in Midlife and Older Age Across 20 Years.","authors":"Damaris Aschwanden, Mathias Allemand, Matthias Kliegel, Angelina R Sutin, Martina Luchetti, Yannick Stephan, Oliver Schilling, Hans-Werner Wahl, Gabriel Olaru, Antonio Terracciano","doi":"10.1177/08902070241272247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cross-sectional work suggests that higher neuroticism and lower conscientiousness are consistently related to more subjective cognitive complaints. Little is known about the longitudinal associations. We used data from the Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study of Adult Development to examine how personality and cognitive complaints jointly unfolded over 20 years. Participants came from a midlife (<i>n</i> = 502, M<sub>age</sub> = 43.7) and an older age group (<i>n</i> = 500, M<sub>age</sub> = 62.5). Random-intercept cross-lagged panel models were used to test the personality-complaints associations at the between-person and within-person levels. Analyses controlled for gender, education, subjective health, objective health, and memory. At the between-person level, higher neuroticism and lower conscientiousness were associated with more cognitive complaints over 20 years, and these associations were stronger in older than middle-aged adults. Among older adults, lower extraversion, openness, and agreeableness were longitudinally associated with more cognitive complaints. At the within-person level, all five traits were concurrently related to cognitive complaints, with small to medium-sized effects, but not across all measurement occasions. Few cross-lagged effects were found, with no consistent pattern across time or age cohorts. This work provides longitudinal evidence of personality-complaints associations and suggests that these associations varied more across individuals than within individuals over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":51376,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Personality","volume":"39 4","pages":"478-497"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070241272247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-sectional work suggests that higher neuroticism and lower conscientiousness are consistently related to more subjective cognitive complaints. Little is known about the longitudinal associations. We used data from the Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study of Adult Development to examine how personality and cognitive complaints jointly unfolded over 20 years. Participants came from a midlife (n = 502, Mage = 43.7) and an older age group (n = 500, Mage = 62.5). Random-intercept cross-lagged panel models were used to test the personality-complaints associations at the between-person and within-person levels. Analyses controlled for gender, education, subjective health, objective health, and memory. At the between-person level, higher neuroticism and lower conscientiousness were associated with more cognitive complaints over 20 years, and these associations were stronger in older than middle-aged adults. Among older adults, lower extraversion, openness, and agreeableness were longitudinally associated with more cognitive complaints. At the within-person level, all five traits were concurrently related to cognitive complaints, with small to medium-sized effects, but not across all measurement occasions. Few cross-lagged effects were found, with no consistent pattern across time or age cohorts. This work provides longitudinal evidence of personality-complaints associations and suggests that these associations varied more across individuals than within individuals over time.

20年中老年人格特征与认知抱怨的纵向关联
横断面研究表明,较高的神经质和较低的责任心始终与更多的主观认知抱怨有关。人们对纵向关联知之甚少。我们使用了来自成人发展跨学科纵向研究的数据来研究20年来人格和认知抱怨是如何共同展开的。参与者来自中年人(n = 502, Mage = 43.7)和老年人(n = 500, Mage = 62.5)。随机截距交叉滞后面板模型用于测试人格-抱怨在人与人之间和人与人之间的联系。分析控制了性别、教育、主观健康、客观健康和记忆。在人与人之间的水平上,高神经质和低责任心与20年来更多的认知抱怨相关,并且这些关联在老年人中比中年人更强。在老年人中,较低的外向性、开放性和宜人性与更多的认知抱怨纵向相关。在人的层面上,所有五个特征都与认知抱怨同时相关,有小到中等的影响,但不是在所有的测量场合。很少有交叉滞后效应被发现,没有一致的模式跨越时间或年龄队列。这项研究提供了人格抱怨关联的纵向证据,并表明随着时间的推移,这些关联在个体之间的差异大于个体内部的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Personality
European Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
8.50%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: It is intended that the journal reflects all areas of current personality psychology. The Journal emphasizes (1) human individuality as manifested in cognitive processes, emotional and motivational functioning, and their physiological and genetic underpinnings, and personal ways of interacting with the environment, (2) individual differences in personality structure and dynamics, (3) studies of intelligence and interindividual differences in cognitive functioning, and (4) development of personality differences as revealed by cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书