Pulmonary Peak Flow Assessment: An Easy Tool for Cardiac Output Estimation in Hemodynamically Stable Neonates.

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS
International Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2026-01-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijpe/8395241
Angela Alfarano, Roberto Marzollo, Serena Amighetti, Cesare Tomasi, Maria Ilaria Bosio, Salvatore Aversa, Elena Borelli, Mario Motta, Francesco Maria Risso
{"title":"Pulmonary Peak Flow Assessment: An Easy Tool for Cardiac Output Estimation in Hemodynamically Stable Neonates.","authors":"Angela Alfarano, Roberto Marzollo, Serena Amighetti, Cesare Tomasi, Maria Ilaria Bosio, Salvatore Aversa, Elena Borelli, Mario Motta, Francesco Maria Risso","doi":"10.1155/ijpe/8395241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Right ventricular output (RVO) assessment can estimate systemic blood flow (SBF) in neonates but requires advanced echocardiography expertise. Pulmonary peak flow (PPF) could be an easier surrogate for RVO. This study is aimed at evaluating the correlation between RVO and PPF in neonates and assessing their intraobserver variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, longitudinal, observational study, we included term and preterm neonates admitted to our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between February and July 2022. A neonatologist with experience in functional echocardiography recorded targeted neonatal scans. Recordings were analyzed off-line for echocardiographic measurements. After 12 months, a second analysis of the recordings was performed by the same examiner to avoid recall bias. We compared the two analyses for intraobserver variability assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed a cohort of 33 term and preterm infants. We found a strong positive correlation between RVO and PPF (<i>p</i> < 0.001). RVO showed a mean intra-observer difference of 34.2 mL/kg/min; PPF showed a mean intraobserver difference of 2.2 cm/s.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the use of PPF as a surrogate for RVO for cardiac output estimation in term and preterm neonates. Because of its simplicity, rapidity, and low intraobserver variability, PPF could be a useful tool for SBF assessment. Future studies should be performed to evaluate the correlation between PPF and other echocardiographic markers of low SBF.</p>","PeriodicalId":51591,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"2026 ","pages":"8395241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12781998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijpe/8395241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Right ventricular output (RVO) assessment can estimate systemic blood flow (SBF) in neonates but requires advanced echocardiography expertise. Pulmonary peak flow (PPF) could be an easier surrogate for RVO. This study is aimed at evaluating the correlation between RVO and PPF in neonates and assessing their intraobserver variability.

Methods: In this single-center, longitudinal, observational study, we included term and preterm neonates admitted to our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between February and July 2022. A neonatologist with experience in functional echocardiography recorded targeted neonatal scans. Recordings were analyzed off-line for echocardiographic measurements. After 12 months, a second analysis of the recordings was performed by the same examiner to avoid recall bias. We compared the two analyses for intraobserver variability assessment.

Results: We analyzed a cohort of 33 term and preterm infants. We found a strong positive correlation between RVO and PPF (p < 0.001). RVO showed a mean intra-observer difference of 34.2 mL/kg/min; PPF showed a mean intraobserver difference of 2.2 cm/s.

Conclusions: Our findings support the use of PPF as a surrogate for RVO for cardiac output estimation in term and preterm neonates. Because of its simplicity, rapidity, and low intraobserver variability, PPF could be a useful tool for SBF assessment. Future studies should be performed to evaluate the correlation between PPF and other echocardiographic markers of low SBF.

Abstract Image

肺峰值流量评估:一个简单的工具估计心输出量在血流动力学稳定的新生儿。
目的:右心室输出量(RVO)评估可以估计全身血流量(SBF)在新生儿,但需要先进的超声心动图专业知识。肺峰值流量(PPF)可以作为RVO的一个更容易的替代指标。本研究旨在评估新生儿RVO和PPF之间的相关性,并评估其观察者内变异性。方法:在这项单中心、纵向、观察性研究中,我们纳入了2022年2月至7月期间入住新生儿重症监护病房的足月和早产儿。一位有功能超声心动图经验的新生儿专家记录了针对性的新生儿扫描。记录进行离线超声心动图测量分析。12个月后,同一位考官对录音进行了第二次分析,以避免回忆偏差。我们比较了两种分析的观察者内变异性评估。结果:我们分析了一组33名足月和早产儿。我们发现RVO与PPF呈正相关(p < 0.001)。RVO显示观察者内平均差异为34.2 mL/kg/min;PPF的平均观察者内差为2.2 cm/s。结论:我们的研究结果支持使用PPF作为RVO的替代品来估计足月和早产儿的心输出量。由于其简单、快速和低观察者内变异性,PPF可能是评估SBF的有用工具。未来的研究应评估PPF与低SBF的其他超声心动图指标之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Pediatrics is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original researcharticles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pediatric research. The journal accepts submissions presented as an original article, short communication, case report, review article, systematic review, or letter to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书