Current practices and considerations in intense pulsed light therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction.

IF 1.2 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-12-22 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-25-00103
Hyunmin Ahn, Ikhyun Jun, Tae-Im Kim, Kyoung Yul Seo
{"title":"Current practices and considerations in intense pulsed light therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction.","authors":"Hyunmin Ahn, Ikhyun Jun, Tae-Im Kim, Kyoung Yul Seo","doi":"10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-25-00103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy has emerged as a promising modality for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), a leading cause of evaporative dry eye disease. However, its clinical application varies significantly across studies, with notable procedural heterogeneity in device selection, treatment intervals, anatomical coverage, and adjunctive strategies. This comprehensive review synthesizes 110 clinical studies to delineate prevailing procedural trends and identify evidence-based components of IPL protocols for MGD. Using structured data extraction, we examined key treatment variables including IPL device type, pulse energy, number and frequency of sessions, anatomical treatment regions, filter types, light guide configurations, and adjunctive interventions such as meibomian gland expression, low-level light therapy, and pharmacologic agents. While substantial variability exists, several consistent procedural patterns were identified that may inform clinical standardization. This review provides a practical framework for optimizing IPL therapy in MGD and underscores the need for further comparative investigations to refine protocol design.</p>","PeriodicalId":44978,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"15 4","pages":"505-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-25-00103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy has emerged as a promising modality for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), a leading cause of evaporative dry eye disease. However, its clinical application varies significantly across studies, with notable procedural heterogeneity in device selection, treatment intervals, anatomical coverage, and adjunctive strategies. This comprehensive review synthesizes 110 clinical studies to delineate prevailing procedural trends and identify evidence-based components of IPL protocols for MGD. Using structured data extraction, we examined key treatment variables including IPL device type, pulse energy, number and frequency of sessions, anatomical treatment regions, filter types, light guide configurations, and adjunctive interventions such as meibomian gland expression, low-level light therapy, and pharmacologic agents. While substantial variability exists, several consistent procedural patterns were identified that may inform clinical standardization. This review provides a practical framework for optimizing IPL therapy in MGD and underscores the need for further comparative investigations to refine protocol design.

Abstract Image

强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍的现状及考虑。
强脉冲光(IPL)治疗已成为治疗睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)的一种有希望的方式,MGD是蒸发性干眼病的主要原因。然而,其临床应用在不同的研究中差异很大,在器械选择、治疗间隔、解剖覆盖范围和辅助策略方面存在明显的程序异质性。本综述综合了110项临床研究,描述了MGD的主流程序趋势,并确定了IPL方案的循证成分。使用结构化数据提取,我们检查了关键的治疗变量,包括IPL设备类型、脉冲能量、次数和频率、解剖治疗区域、滤光片类型、光导配置和辅助干预措施,如睑板腺表达、低强度光治疗和药物。虽然存在大量的差异,但确定了一些一致的程序模式,可以为临床标准化提供信息。这篇综述为优化IPL治疗MGD提供了一个实用的框架,并强调需要进一步的比较研究来完善方案设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书