Benefits and risks of herbal medicine use during pregnancy on offspring outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies

IF 12.2 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacological research Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2026.108092
Chen Chen , Yuezhen Li , Wenling Wang , Chunrong Liu , Qiumei Luo , Yan Ren , Yiquan Xiong , Xin Sun , Jing Tan
{"title":"Benefits and risks of herbal medicine use during pregnancy on offspring outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies","authors":"Chen Chen ,&nbsp;Yuezhen Li ,&nbsp;Wenling Wang ,&nbsp;Chunrong Liu ,&nbsp;Qiumei Luo ,&nbsp;Yan Ren ,&nbsp;Yiquan Xiong ,&nbsp;Xin Sun ,&nbsp;Jing Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.phrs.2026.108092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Herbal medicines are widely used during pregnancy, yet their potential effects on offspring remain uncertain. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate both the potential benefits and risks of prenatal herbal medicine use on offspring outcomes by synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to November 9, 2024. Eligible studies reported maternal use of herbal medicines during pregnancy and assessed offspring-related outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 111 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 39 RCTs, 36 cohort studies, 18 case–control studies, and 18 cross-sectional surveys. In RCTs, prenatal use of certain herbal medicines was associated the live birth rate (RR=1.14, 95 % CI: 1.05–1.24) and a lower risk of birth defects (RR=0.46, 95 % CI: 0.22–0.94), primarily among women undergoing assisted reproduction; reductions in miscarriage were observed among those with threatened or recurrent miscarriage. At the overall level, observational studies adjusted for confounding did not show significant associations between prenatal herbal medicine use and major adverse offspring outcomes (including birth defects, miscarriage, stillbirth, or preterm birth). Exploratory analyses of individual herbal products suggested that some specific herbs—such as almond oil and <em>Glycyrrhiza</em> (with preterm birth), betel quid (with low birth weight), An-Tai-Yin (with musculoskeletal malformations), khat (with nervous system malformations), and <em>Coptidis Rhizoma</em> (with nervous system and genital organ malformations)—may be linked to increased risks. However, these signals were based on a limited number of studies and should be interpreted with caution given variability in exposure definitions, study quality, and potential residual confounding.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>For women undergoing assisted reproduction or those at increased risk of miscarriage, certain herbal medicines may offer potential benefits during pregnancy. Overall, evidence from RCTs and adjusted observational studies does not indicate a clear increase in adverse offspring outcomes associated with prenatal herbal medicine use. Nonetheless, a few herbs have been linked to potential safety concerns, although the supporting evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Cautious use is advised, particularly for products without robust data on fetal and long-term postnatal safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19918,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological research","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 108092"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661826000071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Herbal medicines are widely used during pregnancy, yet their potential effects on offspring remain uncertain. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate both the potential benefits and risks of prenatal herbal medicine use on offspring outcomes by synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to November 9, 2024. Eligible studies reported maternal use of herbal medicines during pregnancy and assessed offspring-related outcomes.

Results

A total of 111 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 39 RCTs, 36 cohort studies, 18 case–control studies, and 18 cross-sectional surveys. In RCTs, prenatal use of certain herbal medicines was associated the live birth rate (RR=1.14, 95 % CI: 1.05–1.24) and a lower risk of birth defects (RR=0.46, 95 % CI: 0.22–0.94), primarily among women undergoing assisted reproduction; reductions in miscarriage were observed among those with threatened or recurrent miscarriage. At the overall level, observational studies adjusted for confounding did not show significant associations between prenatal herbal medicine use and major adverse offspring outcomes (including birth defects, miscarriage, stillbirth, or preterm birth). Exploratory analyses of individual herbal products suggested that some specific herbs—such as almond oil and Glycyrrhiza (with preterm birth), betel quid (with low birth weight), An-Tai-Yin (with musculoskeletal malformations), khat (with nervous system malformations), and Coptidis Rhizoma (with nervous system and genital organ malformations)—may be linked to increased risks. However, these signals were based on a limited number of studies and should be interpreted with caution given variability in exposure definitions, study quality, and potential residual confounding.

Conclusions

For women undergoing assisted reproduction or those at increased risk of miscarriage, certain herbal medicines may offer potential benefits during pregnancy. Overall, evidence from RCTs and adjusted observational studies does not indicate a clear increase in adverse offspring outcomes associated with prenatal herbal medicine use. Nonetheless, a few herbs have been linked to potential safety concerns, although the supporting evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Cautious use is advised, particularly for products without robust data on fetal and long-term postnatal safety.
怀孕期间使用草药对后代结局的益处和风险:随机对照试验和观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:草药在怀孕期间被广泛使用,但它们对后代的潜在影响仍不确定。本系统综述旨在综合随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究的证据,全面评估产前使用草药对后代结局的潜在益处和风险。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central Register of Controlled Trials),检索时间从成立到2024年11月9日。符合条件的研究报告了母亲在怀孕期间使用草药的情况,并评估了与后代相关的结果。结果:共有111项研究符合纳入标准,包括39项随机对照研究、36项队列研究、18项病例对照研究和18项横断面调查。在随机对照试验中,产前使用某些草药与活产率(RR=1.14, 95% CI: 1.05-1.24)和较低的出生缺陷风险(RR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.22-0.94)相关,主要是在接受辅助生殖的妇女中;流产的减少被观察到在那些有先兆或复发性流产。总体而言,经混杂因素调整后的观察性研究并未显示出产前使用草药与主要不良后代结局(包括出生缺陷、流产、死胎或早产)之间存在显著关联。个别草药产品的探索性分析表明,一些特定的草药——如杏仁油和甘草(早产)、槟榔液(低出生体重)、安泰饮(肌肉骨骼畸形)、阿拉伯茶(神经系统畸形)和黄连(神经系统和生殖器官畸形)——可能与风险增加有关。然而,这些信号是基于有限数量的研究,考虑到暴露定义、研究质量和潜在残留混淆的可变性,应谨慎解释。结论:对于接受辅助生殖或流产风险增加的妇女,某些草药可能在怀孕期间提供潜在的益处。总的来说,来自随机对照试验和调整后的观察性研究的证据并没有表明与产前使用草药相关的不良后代结局明显增加。尽管如此,一些草药与潜在的安全问题有关,尽管支持的证据仍然有限且不同。建议谨慎使用,特别是对于没有胎儿和产后长期安全性可靠数据的产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacological research
Pharmacological research 医学-药学
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
491
审稿时长
8 days
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Research publishes cutting-edge articles in biomedical sciences to cover a broad range of topics that move the pharmacological field forward. Pharmacological research publishes articles on molecular, biochemical, translational, and clinical research (including clinical trials); it is proud of its rapid publication of accepted papers that comprises a dedicated, fast acceptance and publication track for high profile articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书