{"title":"The front legs of Sepsis flies (Diptera: Sepsidae) are stimulation devices","authors":"Amir Tarizadeh, Marjan Seiedy","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Male genital and non-genital structures that are specialized to contact the female during copulation have diverged rapidly in many animal taxa. Three hypotheses that provide different explanations for this trend are reproductive isolation, sexual conflict, and female choice. We tested these hypotheses in sepsid flies, which have been considered case studies of sexual conflict, as males grasp and hold the females’ wings with their species-specific front legs before and during mating, and females seem to actively resist this hold. The reproductive isolation and the sexual conflict hypotheses predict that the species-specific modifications of the male’s front legs function as devices to mechanically improve their hold on the female’s wings. The female choice hypothesis predicts that the male front legs function as stimulatory courtship devices. We tested these predictions by observing mating interactions, morphological contact, and the distribution of female sense organs in two species, <em>Sepsis barbata</em> and <em>S. thoracica</em>. Male front legs performed rhythmic, stereotypic, and species-specific movements, providing tactile stimulation of zones of the female wing that contained numerous sense organs but not improving their mechanical grip. We conclude that male front legs are stimulation devices rather than species-specific mechanical clamps, supporting the female choice hypothesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 105325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635725001871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Male genital and non-genital structures that are specialized to contact the female during copulation have diverged rapidly in many animal taxa. Three hypotheses that provide different explanations for this trend are reproductive isolation, sexual conflict, and female choice. We tested these hypotheses in sepsid flies, which have been considered case studies of sexual conflict, as males grasp and hold the females’ wings with their species-specific front legs before and during mating, and females seem to actively resist this hold. The reproductive isolation and the sexual conflict hypotheses predict that the species-specific modifications of the male’s front legs function as devices to mechanically improve their hold on the female’s wings. The female choice hypothesis predicts that the male front legs function as stimulatory courtship devices. We tested these predictions by observing mating interactions, morphological contact, and the distribution of female sense organs in two species, Sepsis barbata and S. thoracica. Male front legs performed rhythmic, stereotypic, and species-specific movements, providing tactile stimulation of zones of the female wing that contained numerous sense organs but not improving their mechanical grip. We conclude that male front legs are stimulation devices rather than species-specific mechanical clamps, supporting the female choice hypothesis.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.