A Systematic Review of Digital Health for Non-older Adults with Risk of Sarcopenia.

IF 1.3
Progress in rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2490/prm.20260001
Kenta Ushida, Ryo Momosaki, Momoko Tohyama, Yuki Kato, Yuka Shirai, Issei Kameda, Miho Shimizu, Asuka Hori, Yuya Sakurai, Hiroki Sato, Yuki Nakashima, Masatsugu Okamura, Norio Yamamoto, Takahiro Tsuge, Kaori Endo, Shota Hayashi, Kenichi Fudeyasu, Daisuke Matsumoto, Hidenori Arai
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Digital Health for Non-older Adults with Risk of Sarcopenia.","authors":"Kenta Ushida, Ryo Momosaki, Momoko Tohyama, Yuki Kato, Yuka Shirai, Issei Kameda, Miho Shimizu, Asuka Hori, Yuya Sakurai, Hiroki Sato, Yuki Nakashima, Masatsugu Okamura, Norio Yamamoto, Takahiro Tsuge, Kaori Endo, Shota Hayashi, Kenichi Fudeyasu, Daisuke Matsumoto, Hidenori Arai","doi":"10.2490/prm.20260001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Non-older adults are at risk of developing sarcopenia, and exercise and increased physical activity are effective preventive interventions. Digital interventions, including gamification, may enhance the effects of exercise interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of digital health interventions on muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical function in non-older adults at risk of sarcopenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of digital health interventions on outcomes related to sarcopenia. Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, and CENTRAL databases. Risk of bias was assessed according to established guidelines, and meta-analyses were conducted. The certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 28 studies were analyzed. The pooled results indicated that digital health interventions led to improvements in grip strength, performance in the chair-stand test, walking speed, Dynamic Gait Index, and Timed Up-and-Go test. In contrast, lower limb muscle strength and lean body mass did not show meaningful improvements. Although no major risks of bias were identified, the strength of the evidence remained limited because of the small number of studies and participants included.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review suggests that digital health interventions may lead to modest improvements in muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical function in non-older adults at risk of sarcopenia, although the current evidence remains inconclusive. Further studies are needed to establish their effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"20260001"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12774860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20260001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Non-older adults are at risk of developing sarcopenia, and exercise and increased physical activity are effective preventive interventions. Digital interventions, including gamification, may enhance the effects of exercise interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of digital health interventions on muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical function in non-older adults at risk of sarcopenia.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of digital health interventions on outcomes related to sarcopenia. Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, and CENTRAL databases. Risk of bias was assessed according to established guidelines, and meta-analyses were conducted. The certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

Results: In total, 28 studies were analyzed. The pooled results indicated that digital health interventions led to improvements in grip strength, performance in the chair-stand test, walking speed, Dynamic Gait Index, and Timed Up-and-Go test. In contrast, lower limb muscle strength and lean body mass did not show meaningful improvements. Although no major risks of bias were identified, the strength of the evidence remained limited because of the small number of studies and participants included.

Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that digital health interventions may lead to modest improvements in muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical function in non-older adults at risk of sarcopenia, although the current evidence remains inconclusive. Further studies are needed to establish their effect.

有肌少症风险的非老年人数字健康系统评价
目的:非老年人有发生肌肉减少症的风险,锻炼和增加体力活动是有效的预防干预措施。包括游戏化在内的数字干预可能会增强锻炼干预的效果。本系统综述和荟萃分析研究了数字健康干预对有肌肉减少症风险的非老年人肌肉力量、肌肉质量和身体功能的影响。方法:我们对随机对照试验进行了系统回顾,评估了数字健康干预对肌肉减少症相关结果的影响。在MEDLINE (Ovid)、Web of Science Core Collection和CENTRAL数据库中进行文献检索。根据既定指南评估偏倚风险,并进行meta分析。使用建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)框架对证据的确定性进行评级。结果:共分析28项研究。综合结果表明,数字健康干预导致握力、椅架测试、步行速度、动态步态指数和定时起身测试中的表现有所改善。相比之下,下肢肌肉力量和瘦体重没有明显的改善。虽然没有发现主要的偏倚风险,但由于纳入的研究和受试者数量较少,证据的强度仍然有限。结论:本系统综述表明,数字健康干预可能会导致有肌肉减少症风险的非老年人肌肉力量、肌肉质量和身体功能的适度改善,尽管目前的证据仍不确定。需要进一步的研究来确定它们的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书