An evaluation and proposed modifications of personality disorder trait diagnostic sets in the alternative model of personality disorders.

IF 4.2
Sharlane C L Lau, Lena C Quilty, Martin Sellbom, R Michael Bagby
{"title":"An evaluation and proposed modifications of personality disorder trait diagnostic sets in the alternative model of personality disorders.","authors":"Sharlane C L Lau, Lena C Quilty, Martin Sellbom, R Michael Bagby","doi":"10.1037/per0000757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) in Section III of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition, text revision includes trait-based diagnostic criteria for six personality disorders (PDs). This study evaluates the predictive validity of the AMPD trait diagnostic criteria for these six PDs in capturing their Section II PD counterparts and examines whether modifications informed by meta-analytic findings (Watters et al., 2019) improve incremental validity. In community (<i>N</i> = 238) and community mental health samples (<i>N</i> = 289), we assessed Section III traits using the Personality Inventory for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition and Section II PDs using three different measurement methods-structured clinical interview, self-report, and informant report. A series of hierarchical regressions tested the extent to which proposed traits predicted their Section II counterparts and whether the inclusion of nondesignated traits or removal of proposed traits enhanced predictive validity. Findings confirmed that Section III proposed traits significantly predicted their corresponding Section II PDs. Results also revealed that some proposed traits failed to significantly contribute to their assigned PDs, while certain nonproposed traits improved predictive validity. Based on these results, we propose targeted, empirically informed modifications to the AMPD diagnostic trait sets to improve construct validity and clinical utility, particularly for avoidant, borderline, narcissistic, and obsessive-compulsive PDs. These findings underscore the need to refine the AMPD trait model to better capture the complexity of personality pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) in Section III of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, text revision includes trait-based diagnostic criteria for six personality disorders (PDs). This study evaluates the predictive validity of the AMPD trait diagnostic criteria for these six PDs in capturing their Section II PD counterparts and examines whether modifications informed by meta-analytic findings (Watters et al., 2019) improve incremental validity. In community (N = 238) and community mental health samples (N = 289), we assessed Section III traits using the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition and Section II PDs using three different measurement methods-structured clinical interview, self-report, and informant report. A series of hierarchical regressions tested the extent to which proposed traits predicted their Section II counterparts and whether the inclusion of nondesignated traits or removal of proposed traits enhanced predictive validity. Findings confirmed that Section III proposed traits significantly predicted their corresponding Section II PDs. Results also revealed that some proposed traits failed to significantly contribute to their assigned PDs, while certain nonproposed traits improved predictive validity. Based on these results, we propose targeted, empirically informed modifications to the AMPD diagnostic trait sets to improve construct validity and clinical utility, particularly for avoidant, borderline, narcissistic, and obsessive-compulsive PDs. These findings underscore the need to refine the AMPD trait model to better capture the complexity of personality pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

人格障碍替代模型中人格障碍特征诊断集的评估和建议修改。
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版第三节中的人格障碍替代模型(AMPD),文本修订包括六种人格障碍(pd)的基于特征的诊断标准。本研究评估了AMPD特征诊断标准对这六种PD的预测效度,以捕获其II部分PD对应物,并检查了meta分析结果所告知的修改是否提高了增量效度(Watters等人,2019)。在社区(N = 238)和社区精神健康样本(N = 289)中,我们使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表和《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第二部分人格量表,采用结构化临床访谈、自我报告和信息提供者报告三种不同的测量方法,对第三部分特征进行了评估。一系列的层次回归测试了所提出的性状对第二部分对应性状的预测程度,以及是否包括非指定性状或去除所提出的性状增强了预测效度。研究结果证实,Section III提出的性状与Section II相应的pd具有显著的相关性。结果还显示,一些被提议的性状对其指定的pd没有显著贡献,而某些未被提议的性状提高了预测效度。基于这些结果,我们对AMPD诊断特征集提出了有针对性的、基于经验的修改,以提高结构的有效性和临床实用性,特别是对于回避型、边缘型、自恋型和强迫性pd。这些发现强调了完善AMPD特征模型以更好地捕捉人格病理复杂性的必要性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书