Reliability of Resting Heart Rate-based Target Heart Rate for Exercise Prescription after Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-22 DOI:10.1298/ptr.25-E10371
Yuya Utsumi, Koji Takase, Naoya Murakami, Tokiko Nakagawa, Takuya Obayashi, Riyo Ogura, Shinobu Hosokawa
{"title":"Reliability of Resting Heart Rate-based Target Heart Rate for Exercise Prescription after Acute Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Yuya Utsumi, Koji Takase, Naoya Murakami, Tokiko Nakagawa, Takuya Obayashi, Riyo Ogura, Shinobu Hosokawa","doi":"10.1298/ptr.25-E10371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Anaerobic threshold (AT) assessment using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) during hospitalization is considered ideal for prescribing exercise regimens in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, practical limitations often hinder its implementation. This study evaluated strategies for prescribing exercise based on resting heart rate (RHR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 194 consecutive male patients with AMI who underwent CPX within 13 days of hospitalization were enrolled. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the agreement between the heart rate (HR) at AT (ATHR) and RHR +20, +25, and +30 beats. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing ΔHR (ATHR-RHR). Decision-tree analysis was used to establish thresholds for appropriate exercise prescriptions based on RHR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless of β-blocker use, the RHR + 25 formula most closely approximated the ATHR in patients who underwent early CPX after AMI. Multivariate analysis identified RHR and hemoglobin (Hb) as significant predictors of ΔHR. Decision-tree analysis indicated that RHR + 25 was appropriate when RHR <91 bpm and Hb ≥12.0 g/dL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RHR + 25 is a practical alternative for determining the target HR in post-AMI rehabilitation among male patients, particularly in those with RHR <91 bpm and Hb ≥12.0 g/dL, when CPX is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"28 3","pages":"206-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12778352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.25-E10371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Anaerobic threshold (AT) assessment using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) during hospitalization is considered ideal for prescribing exercise regimens in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, practical limitations often hinder its implementation. This study evaluated strategies for prescribing exercise based on resting heart rate (RHR).

Methods: A total of 194 consecutive male patients with AMI who underwent CPX within 13 days of hospitalization were enrolled. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the agreement between the heart rate (HR) at AT (ATHR) and RHR +20, +25, and +30 beats. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing ΔHR (ATHR-RHR). Decision-tree analysis was used to establish thresholds for appropriate exercise prescriptions based on RHR.

Results: Regardless of β-blocker use, the RHR + 25 formula most closely approximated the ATHR in patients who underwent early CPX after AMI. Multivariate analysis identified RHR and hemoglobin (Hb) as significant predictors of ΔHR. Decision-tree analysis indicated that RHR + 25 was appropriate when RHR <91 bpm and Hb ≥12.0 g/dL.

Conclusions: RHR + 25 is a practical alternative for determining the target HR in post-AMI rehabilitation among male patients, particularly in those with RHR <91 bpm and Hb ≥12.0 g/dL, when CPX is not feasible.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急性心肌梗死后静息心率为基础的目标心率运动处方的可靠性。
目的:住院期间使用心肺运动试验(CPX)进行无氧阈(AT)评估被认为是急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者处方运动方案的理想选择。然而,实际限制往往阻碍其实施。本研究评估了基于静息心率(RHR)的运动处方策略。方法:纳入194例连续住院13天内行CPX治疗的AMI男性患者。采用Bland-Altman分析评估at (ATHR)时心率(HR)与RHR +20、+25和+30次之间的一致性。通过多元回归分析,确定ΔHR (ATHR-RHR)的影响因素。采用决策树分析法建立基于RHR的合适运动处方的阈值。结果:无论使用何种β受体阻滞剂,RHR + 25公式最接近AMI后早期CPX患者的ATHR。多变量分析发现RHR和血红蛋白(Hb)是ΔHR的重要预测因子。结论:RHR + 25是确定男性ami后康复目标HR的一种实用替代方法,尤其是在有RHR的患者中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书