‘And they say Leftists have no sense of humour’: Sanctioning interpretive failures as discursive gatekeeping on social media

IF 3.1 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Discourse Context & Media Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.dcm.2026.100974
Noam Gal
{"title":"‘And they say Leftists have no sense of humour’: Sanctioning interpretive failures as discursive gatekeeping on social media","authors":"Noam Gal","doi":"10.1016/j.dcm.2026.100974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Misinterpretations are an integral part of social interaction. They participate in the meaning-making process of the interaction, but also play a wider social role. The context collapse characterising social media advances such occurrences, and the public display of the communicative disruption often results in temperamental responses. This paper explores this complex communicative arena, focusing on the responses induced by misinterpreted ironic utterances. It considers the significant role of public negotiations over failed interpretations online, in processes of social boundary consolidation. Based on the analysis of such flawed interactions on social media, I offer a typology of nine discursive sanctions based on two dimensions: participation structures and levels of content explicitness. These aspects interact in complex, often non-intuitive ways on social media, and participate in the boundary demarcation of the interpretive community within them. The paper concludes by discussing the significant social role of the failed interpreter, termed here “the un-addressee”.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46649,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Context & Media","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 100974"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Context & Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695826000012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Misinterpretations are an integral part of social interaction. They participate in the meaning-making process of the interaction, but also play a wider social role. The context collapse characterising social media advances such occurrences, and the public display of the communicative disruption often results in temperamental responses. This paper explores this complex communicative arena, focusing on the responses induced by misinterpreted ironic utterances. It considers the significant role of public negotiations over failed interpretations online, in processes of social boundary consolidation. Based on the analysis of such flawed interactions on social media, I offer a typology of nine discursive sanctions based on two dimensions: participation structures and levels of content explicitness. These aspects interact in complex, often non-intuitive ways on social media, and participate in the boundary demarcation of the interpretive community within them. The paper concludes by discussing the significant social role of the failed interpreter, termed here “the un-addressee”.
“他们还说左翼分子没有幽默感”:在社交媒体上,他们把解释上的失败视为话语把关
误解是社会交往中不可或缺的一部分。他们参与了相互作用的意义生成过程,同时也扮演着更广泛的社会角色。社交媒体的语境崩溃加剧了这类事件的发生,而公开展示这种沟通中断往往会导致情绪波动。本文探讨了这一复杂的交际领域,重点关注误读讽刺话语所引起的反应。它考虑了在社会边界巩固过程中,对失败的在线解释进行公开谈判的重要作用。基于对社交媒体上这种有缺陷的互动的分析,我提出了一种基于两个维度的九种话语制裁的类型学:参与结构和内容明确程度。这些方面在社交媒体上以复杂而非直观的方式相互作用,并参与其中的解释社区的边界划分。本文最后讨论了失败的口译者的重要社会角色,这里称之为“未被收件人”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discourse Context & Media
Discourse Context & Media COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书