Do-it-yourself hormones: constructing credible knowledge in an online transgender forum

IF 2.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
SSM. Qualitative research in health Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100692
Natasa Stoli, Klasien Horstman, Olga Zvonareva
{"title":"Do-it-yourself hormones: constructing credible knowledge in an online transgender forum","authors":"Natasa Stoli,&nbsp;Klasien Horstman,&nbsp;Olga Zvonareva","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>On the continuum of patient participation between ‘‘informed patients'’ and ‘‘patients in control’‘, DIY pharmaceuticals are considered the most radical because they are produced outside regular medical professional and regulatory contexts. While some see DIY pharmaceuticals as an important contribution to making pharmaceuticals more accessible, others are concerned because they circumvent established procedures for assessing safety and efficacy. We studied a particular case of DIY pharmaceuticals: citizen drug developers who enable access to hormone therapy in transgender health care through the home production of hormones. By studying an online community of DIY hormone producers, we aimed to gain insight into how they strive to develop knowledge practices that are credible and safe. Theoretically, we drew from science and technology studies scholarship on knowledge credibility and patient participation in knowledge production. We relied on a qualitative study of an online forum to generate our data. The analysis shows how citizen drug developers constructed and performed standards of safety and efficacy in sharing knowledge within their community and how these standards were ensured. DIY pharmaceuticals can be an unconventional but important pathway for citizen participation in biomedical knowledge production, employing strategies for performing credible knowledge outside formal laboratory spaces and in the absence of external supervision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525001702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the continuum of patient participation between ‘‘informed patients'’ and ‘‘patients in control’‘, DIY pharmaceuticals are considered the most radical because they are produced outside regular medical professional and regulatory contexts. While some see DIY pharmaceuticals as an important contribution to making pharmaceuticals more accessible, others are concerned because they circumvent established procedures for assessing safety and efficacy. We studied a particular case of DIY pharmaceuticals: citizen drug developers who enable access to hormone therapy in transgender health care through the home production of hormones. By studying an online community of DIY hormone producers, we aimed to gain insight into how they strive to develop knowledge practices that are credible and safe. Theoretically, we drew from science and technology studies scholarship on knowledge credibility and patient participation in knowledge production. We relied on a qualitative study of an online forum to generate our data. The analysis shows how citizen drug developers constructed and performed standards of safety and efficacy in sharing knowledge within their community and how these standards were ensured. DIY pharmaceuticals can be an unconventional but important pathway for citizen participation in biomedical knowledge production, employing strategies for performing credible knowledge outside formal laboratory spaces and in the absence of external supervision.
自己动手的荷尔蒙:在一个在线跨性别论坛上构建可信的知识
在“知情患者”和“受控患者”之间患者参与的连续性方面,DIY药品被认为是最激进的,因为它们是在常规医疗专业和监管环境之外生产的。虽然一些人认为DIY药品是对使药品更容易获得的重要贡献,但另一些人则感到担忧,因为它们绕过了评估安全性和有效性的既定程序。我们研究了一个DIY药物的特殊案例:公民药物开发人员通过家庭生产激素,使跨性别医疗保健能够获得激素治疗。通过研究一个DIY激素生产商的在线社区,我们旨在深入了解他们如何努力发展可信和安全的知识实践。从理论上讲,我们借鉴了科学技术研究中关于知识可信度和患者参与知识生产的研究成果。我们依靠对在线论坛的定性研究来生成我们的数据。分析显示了公民药物开发人员如何构建和执行在社区内分享知识的安全性和有效性标准,以及如何确保这些标准。DIY药品可以成为公民参与生物医学知识生产的非常规但重要的途径,采用在正式实验室空间之外和缺乏外部监督的情况下执行可信知识的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书