Jelena Vlahović , Nikola Kržanović , Miloš Živanović , Ivana Stojanović , Luka Bakrač , Argiro Boziari , Miloš Đaletić , Ana Fernandes , Liviu-Cristian Mihailescu , Erinc Reyhanoglu , Siarhei Saroka , Teemu Siiskonen , Jana Šmoldasová , Vladimir Sochor , Maria do Ceu Ferreira , Nataša Todorović
{"title":"Performance assessment of commonly used active radiation protection dosimeters for individual and area workplace monitoring","authors":"Jelena Vlahović , Nikola Kržanović , Miloš Živanović , Ivana Stojanović , Luka Bakrač , Argiro Boziari , Miloš Đaletić , Ana Fernandes , Liviu-Cristian Mihailescu , Erinc Reyhanoglu , Siarhei Saroka , Teemu Siiskonen , Jana Šmoldasová , Vladimir Sochor , Maria do Ceu Ferreira , Nataša Todorović","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2026.102159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Improvement in radiation protection practice may be achieved by acquisition of reliable and accurate dosimetry data. Use of dosimeters with known properties provides insight into their performance in real radiation fields encountered in radiation monitoring practice.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Performance evaluation in a wide range of radiation conditions provides insight into dosimeter behaviour, providing input for revision, update and harmonization of IEC type testing standards.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 32 active dosimeters were investigated, of which 26 are used for area workplace, and 6 for individual monitoring. Dosimeter performance was evaluated against the IEC 60846–1:2009 standard for portable workplace and environmental meters and monitors and the IEC 61526:2024 standard for active personal dosimeters in a wide range of photon energies, angles of incidence and dose equivalent rates. Performance was examined beyond the minimum rated range: 33.3 keV–1.25 MeV photon energy; (0°; ±75°) angle of incidence for personal dosimeters and (0°; ±120° with 180°) for area dosimeters; 3 μSv h<sup>−1</sup> – 7 Sv h<sup>−1</sup> dose rate range. In addition, dosimeter short-term stability and overload properties were investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>State-of-the-art and commonly used dosimeters complied with the standard defined limits of variation with respect to the manufacturer stated specifications. Some dosimeters had significantly lower variations in terms of relative response than the current standard stated requirements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Potential update of the relevant IEC type testing standards was considered, with the possibility of introducing two distinct dosimeter classes, one of which would comply with reduced limits of variation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":"Article 102159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850726000026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Improvement in radiation protection practice may be achieved by acquisition of reliable and accurate dosimetry data. Use of dosimeters with known properties provides insight into their performance in real radiation fields encountered in radiation monitoring practice.
Aim
Performance evaluation in a wide range of radiation conditions provides insight into dosimeter behaviour, providing input for revision, update and harmonization of IEC type testing standards.
Methods
A total of 32 active dosimeters were investigated, of which 26 are used for area workplace, and 6 for individual monitoring. Dosimeter performance was evaluated against the IEC 60846–1:2009 standard for portable workplace and environmental meters and monitors and the IEC 61526:2024 standard for active personal dosimeters in a wide range of photon energies, angles of incidence and dose equivalent rates. Performance was examined beyond the minimum rated range: 33.3 keV–1.25 MeV photon energy; (0°; ±75°) angle of incidence for personal dosimeters and (0°; ±120° with 180°) for area dosimeters; 3 μSv h−1 – 7 Sv h−1 dose rate range. In addition, dosimeter short-term stability and overload properties were investigated.
Results
State-of-the-art and commonly used dosimeters complied with the standard defined limits of variation with respect to the manufacturer stated specifications. Some dosimeters had significantly lower variations in terms of relative response than the current standard stated requirements.
Conclusion
Potential update of the relevant IEC type testing standards was considered, with the possibility of introducing two distinct dosimeter classes, one of which would comply with reduced limits of variation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.