Socioeconomic inequalities in C-section deliveries in low- and middle-income countries: measurement and determinants.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mohammad Hajizadeh, Emran Hasan
{"title":"Socioeconomic inequalities in C-section deliveries in low- and middle-income countries: measurement and determinants.","authors":"Mohammad Hajizadeh, Emran Hasan","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-224851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While C-section (CS) deliveries exhibit significant socioeconomic inequalities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the extent and underlying drivers of these inequalities remain poorly understood. This study assesses these inequalities and identifies key contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The most recent nationally representative samples of live births (n=652 539) from the Demographic and Health Surveys, conducted between 2014 and 2024 in 44 LMICs, were used to calculate the CS delivery rates. The Wagstaff (WI) and Erreygers (EI) indices were used to measure the relative and absolute socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery. Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify the proximate determinants of the observed socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery across the selected LMICs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CS delivery rates varied across LMICs, with a median of 6.25% (IQR=16.18). The WI and EI indicated that CS deliveries were concentrated among high socioeconomic backgrounds, with only one country exhibiting no inequality. The pooled estimates (WI: 0.32, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.36 and EI: 0.11, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.14) further demonstrate the concentration of CS among the rich in LMICs. Meta-regression analyses indicated that inequalities in education and antenatal care were significantly and positively associated with the concentration of CS deliveries among wealthier women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CS delivery concentration among wealthier women remains a health concern in LMICs. Given the positive link between higher education and antenatal care with CS deliveries, country-specific policies promoting health education and targeted messaging during antenatal care visits on the adverse health effects of unnecessary CS deliveries may help reduce socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"423-431"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-224851","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While C-section (CS) deliveries exhibit significant socioeconomic inequalities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the extent and underlying drivers of these inequalities remain poorly understood. This study assesses these inequalities and identifies key contributing factors.

Methods: The most recent nationally representative samples of live births (n=652 539) from the Demographic and Health Surveys, conducted between 2014 and 2024 in 44 LMICs, were used to calculate the CS delivery rates. The Wagstaff (WI) and Erreygers (EI) indices were used to measure the relative and absolute socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery. Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify the proximate determinants of the observed socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery across the selected LMICs.

Results: CS delivery rates varied across LMICs, with a median of 6.25% (IQR=16.18). The WI and EI indicated that CS deliveries were concentrated among high socioeconomic backgrounds, with only one country exhibiting no inequality. The pooled estimates (WI: 0.32, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.36 and EI: 0.11, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.14) further demonstrate the concentration of CS among the rich in LMICs. Meta-regression analyses indicated that inequalities in education and antenatal care were significantly and positively associated with the concentration of CS deliveries among wealthier women.

Conclusion: CS delivery concentration among wealthier women remains a health concern in LMICs. Given the positive link between higher education and antenatal care with CS deliveries, country-specific policies promoting health education and targeted messaging during antenatal care visits on the adverse health effects of unnecessary CS deliveries may help reduce socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery.

低收入和中等收入国家剖腹产分娩中的社会经济不平等:衡量和决定因素。
背景:虽然在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)剖腹产分娩表现出显著的社会经济不平等,但人们对这些不平等的程度和潜在驱动因素仍知之甚少。这项研究评估了这些不平等,并确定了关键的促成因素。方法:采用2014年至2024年在44个低收入和中等收入国家进行的人口与健康调查中最新的全国代表性活产样本(n= 655239)来计算CS分娩率。使用Wagstaff (WI)和Erreygers (EI)指数来衡量CS交付中的相对和绝对社会经济不平等。进行meta回归分析,以确定在选定的中低收入国家中观察到的CS交付中社会经济不平等的近似决定因素。结果:CS递送率在中低收入国家之间存在差异,中位数为6.25% (IQR=16.18)。WI和EI表明,CS交付集中在高社会经济背景的国家,只有一个国家没有表现出不平等。汇总估计(WI: 0.32, 95% CI 0.28至0.36,EI: 0.11, 95% CI 0.09至0.14)进一步表明,CS在低收入中低收入人群中的浓度较高。荟萃回归分析表明,教育和产前保健方面的不平等与富裕妇女中CS分娩的集中显著正相关。结论:富裕妇女CS分娩集中仍然是中低收入国家的一个健康问题。鉴于高等教育和产前保健与保健分娩之间的积极联系,在产前保健访问期间促进健康教育和有针对性地宣传不必要的保健分娩对健康的不利影响的国别政策可能有助于减少保健分娩中的社会经济不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health is a leading international journal devoted to publication of original research and reviews covering applied, methodological and theoretical issues with emphasis on studies using multidisciplinary or integrative approaches. The journal aims to improve epidemiological knowledge and ultimately health worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书