Industry, doctors and bureaucracy.

K Bruun
{"title":"Industry, doctors and bureaucracy.","authors":"K Bruun","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The central actors on the health arena are industry, doctors and bureaucracy. Whilst general trends towards industrialization, professionalization and bureaucratization are not limited to the health field, developments there have been extremely rapid and show unique features. The three actors often cooperate in harmony despite different goals. On the other hand, bureaucracy is often unable to reach its goals because of resistance from the other two actors. Conflicts, however, occur and are intensive in many third world countries. In industrial countries, too, trade interest in pharmaceuticals may over-ride public health considerations. Conflicts concerning individual drugs have received much publicity. In general, doctors as an organized profession tend to protest against bureaucracy but not against industry. In recent years it has become more and more apparent that health issues cannot be treated as the internal affairs of the actors. New actors have entered the arena. Patients' and consumers' organizations, small groups of doctors and new bodies such as Health Action International have changed the scene. Acting together with fundamental societal changes, this adds a new dimension to the debate and raises the question of including a social element in doctors' ethics. Medical research will also be more directed towards the health care system and become closer to the traditional problems of social science. Social scientists will therefore have contributions to make - studying how the relations between the actors influence the health care system and public health, for instance.</p>","PeriodicalId":76526,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of social medicine. Supplementum","volume":"37 ","pages":"7-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of social medicine. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The central actors on the health arena are industry, doctors and bureaucracy. Whilst general trends towards industrialization, professionalization and bureaucratization are not limited to the health field, developments there have been extremely rapid and show unique features. The three actors often cooperate in harmony despite different goals. On the other hand, bureaucracy is often unable to reach its goals because of resistance from the other two actors. Conflicts, however, occur and are intensive in many third world countries. In industrial countries, too, trade interest in pharmaceuticals may over-ride public health considerations. Conflicts concerning individual drugs have received much publicity. In general, doctors as an organized profession tend to protest against bureaucracy but not against industry. In recent years it has become more and more apparent that health issues cannot be treated as the internal affairs of the actors. New actors have entered the arena. Patients' and consumers' organizations, small groups of doctors and new bodies such as Health Action International have changed the scene. Acting together with fundamental societal changes, this adds a new dimension to the debate and raises the question of including a social element in doctors' ethics. Medical research will also be more directed towards the health care system and become closer to the traditional problems of social science. Social scientists will therefore have contributions to make - studying how the relations between the actors influence the health care system and public health, for instance.

工业、医生和官僚主义。
卫生领域的核心角色是行业、医生和官僚机构。虽然工业化、专业化和官僚化的总体趋势并不局限于卫生领域,但该领域的发展非常迅速,并呈现出独特的特点。尽管目标不同,但三位演员经常合作默契。另一方面,由于其他两个行动者的抵制,官僚主义往往无法实现其目标。然而,冲突在许多第三世界国家发生并十分激烈。在工业国家,药品的贸易利益也可能凌驾于公共卫生考虑之上。关于个别药物的冲突已经得到了广泛的宣传。总的来说,医生作为一个有组织的职业,倾向于反对官僚主义,而不是反对行业。近年来,越来越明显的是,健康问题不能被视为行为体的内部事务。新的演员进入了舞台。患者和消费者组织、医生小团体以及国际健康行动(Health Action International)等新机构改变了现状。与根本的社会变革一起,这为辩论增加了一个新的维度,并提出了在医生道德中纳入社会因素的问题。医学研究也将更多地面向卫生保健系统,更接近社会科学的传统问题。因此,社会科学家将做出贡献——例如,研究参与者之间的关系如何影响卫生保健系统和公共卫生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信