Changes to Weight Bias Internalization and Eating Behaviors in Adults Aged 50+ With Overweight or Obesity During a Structured 12-Week Behavioral Weight Management Intervention.

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2026-01-04 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.70110
Erica Howes, Kristen R Howard, Eleni Laskaridou, Molly Parker, Austin D'Angelo, Jenna Warnock, Cameron Heidary, Sienna Lambert, Ved Thakur, Brenda M Davy
{"title":"Changes to Weight Bias Internalization and Eating Behaviors in Adults Aged 50+ With Overweight or Obesity During a Structured 12-Week Behavioral Weight Management Intervention.","authors":"Erica Howes, Kristen R Howard, Eleni Laskaridou, Molly Parker, Austin D'Angelo, Jenna Warnock, Cameron Heidary, Sienna Lambert, Ved Thakur, Brenda M Davy","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Weight stigma is a prevalent issue among individuals with overweight and obesity pursuing weight loss; however, few studies have examined this issue in middle-aged and older adults. Treatment-seeking populations may also be at risk of disordered eating or excess concern about weight and shape; thus, it is important to evaluate how these parameters may change over the course of a weight loss intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults aged 50+ (<i>n</i> = 83; 60 F, 23 M) completed measures of experiences of weight stigma, weight bias internalization (WBIS-M), the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), and binge eating (BES) at baseline and after completion of a structured 12-week behavioral weight loss intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five percent of participants reported previous experiences of weight stigma at baseline through either teasing, unfair treatment, or discrimination. At baseline, the mean WBIS-M score was 3.37 (SD 1.03). From baseline to post-intervention, there were decreases (all <i>p</i> < 0.05) in WBIS-M scores (adjusted mean difference -0.46), scores on the shape concern subscale of the EDE-Q (adjusted mean difference -0.75), and BES scores (adjusted mean difference -3.75). Scores on the restraint subscale of the EDE-Q increased by an adjusted mean of 1.77 units.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that participating in a structured behavioral weight loss program may have beneficial effects on weight bias, body shape concern, and binge eating, consistent with previous findings in weight management interventions in younger populations. Future work is needed to determine if changes to weight bias internalization and eating behaviors persist during weight loss maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"12 1","pages":"e70110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12765478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Weight stigma is a prevalent issue among individuals with overweight and obesity pursuing weight loss; however, few studies have examined this issue in middle-aged and older adults. Treatment-seeking populations may also be at risk of disordered eating or excess concern about weight and shape; thus, it is important to evaluate how these parameters may change over the course of a weight loss intervention.

Methods: Adults aged 50+ (n = 83; 60 F, 23 M) completed measures of experiences of weight stigma, weight bias internalization (WBIS-M), the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), and binge eating (BES) at baseline and after completion of a structured 12-week behavioral weight loss intervention.

Results: Forty-five percent of participants reported previous experiences of weight stigma at baseline through either teasing, unfair treatment, or discrimination. At baseline, the mean WBIS-M score was 3.37 (SD 1.03). From baseline to post-intervention, there were decreases (all p < 0.05) in WBIS-M scores (adjusted mean difference -0.46), scores on the shape concern subscale of the EDE-Q (adjusted mean difference -0.75), and BES scores (adjusted mean difference -3.75). Scores on the restraint subscale of the EDE-Q increased by an adjusted mean of 1.77 units.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that participating in a structured behavioral weight loss program may have beneficial effects on weight bias, body shape concern, and binge eating, consistent with previous findings in weight management interventions in younger populations. Future work is needed to determine if changes to weight bias internalization and eating behaviors persist during weight loss maintenance.

Abstract Image

在结构化的12周行为体重管理干预期间,50岁以上超重或肥胖成年人体重偏见内化和饮食行为的变化。
背景:体重耻辱感在追求减肥的超重和肥胖人群中是一个普遍问题;然而,很少有研究在中老年人中检查这个问题。寻求治疗的人群也可能面临饮食失调或过度关注体重和体型的风险;因此,评估这些参数在减肥干预过程中如何变化是很重要的。方法:50岁以上的成年人(n = 83; 60岁,23岁)在基线和完成结构化的12周行为减肥干预后,完成了体重耻辱感、体重偏见内化(WBIS-M)、饮食失调检查问卷(ed - q)和暴食(BES)的经历测量。结果:45%的参与者报告了以前在基线时因戏弄、不公平待遇或歧视而遭受体重耻辱的经历。基线时,WBIS-M平均评分为3.37 (SD 1.03)。结论:这些研究结果表明,参与有组织的行为减肥计划可能对体重偏差、体型担忧和暴饮暴食有有益的影响,这与之前在年轻人群中体重管理干预的研究结果一致。未来的工作需要确定体重偏见内化和饮食行为的变化是否在减肥维持期间持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书