{"title":"Effects of restorative materials, colors, and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner","authors":"Sophia Lin , Wei-Chun Lin , Amal Alfaraj","doi":"10.1016/j.jds.2025.10.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/purpose</h3><div>When teeth are restored using dental materials, there is potential for these restorations to influence the accuracy of intraoral scans. Such variations in accuracy could subsequently affect the precision of the derived virtual cast, the registration of the maxillo-mandibular relationship, and the fabrication of prostheses. This study aimed to assess the effect of various restorative materials, prosthesis colors, and their surface finishes on the accuracy of intraoral scans performed with a TRIOS 4 scanner.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Using a 4 × 2 × 2 factorial experimental design, the research analyzed how metal-ceramic, zirconia, lithium disilicate, and milled PMMA; shades B1 and A4; and surface finishes (either polishing or glazing) influence the trueness and precision of scans. The trueness and precision were quantified using root mean square (RMS) values.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences in scan accuracy were observed, contingent on material, color, and finishing, along with notable interactions between these factors. Overall, PMMA exhibited the highest trueness and zirconia demonstrated the best precision. Polished lithium disilicate and PMMA showed better trueness for the A4 shade, whereas glazed lithium disilicate and PMMA performed better for the B1 shade. Metal-ceramic restorations showed an opposite trend. Zirconia restorations showed better trueness for A4 shade than B1 shade for both polished and glazed surfaces.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Significant interactions between materials, colors, and surface treatments were observed. Although clinicians may not be able to modify existing restorations' materials, color, or surface treatment, they need to be mindful that the intricate interaction of these factors will affect the accuracy of intraoral scans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"Pages 533-540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790225003988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/purpose
When teeth are restored using dental materials, there is potential for these restorations to influence the accuracy of intraoral scans. Such variations in accuracy could subsequently affect the precision of the derived virtual cast, the registration of the maxillo-mandibular relationship, and the fabrication of prostheses. This study aimed to assess the effect of various restorative materials, prosthesis colors, and their surface finishes on the accuracy of intraoral scans performed with a TRIOS 4 scanner.
Materials and methods
Using a 4 × 2 × 2 factorial experimental design, the research analyzed how metal-ceramic, zirconia, lithium disilicate, and milled PMMA; shades B1 and A4; and surface finishes (either polishing or glazing) influence the trueness and precision of scans. The trueness and precision were quantified using root mean square (RMS) values.
Results
Significant differences in scan accuracy were observed, contingent on material, color, and finishing, along with notable interactions between these factors. Overall, PMMA exhibited the highest trueness and zirconia demonstrated the best precision. Polished lithium disilicate and PMMA showed better trueness for the A4 shade, whereas glazed lithium disilicate and PMMA performed better for the B1 shade. Metal-ceramic restorations showed an opposite trend. Zirconia restorations showed better trueness for A4 shade than B1 shade for both polished and glazed surfaces.
Conclusion
Significant interactions between materials, colors, and surface treatments were observed. Although clinicians may not be able to modify existing restorations' materials, color, or surface treatment, they need to be mindful that the intricate interaction of these factors will affect the accuracy of intraoral scans.
期刊介绍:
he Journal of Dental Sciences (JDS), published quarterly, is the official and open access publication of the Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China (ADS-ROC). The precedent journal of the JDS is the Chinese Dental Journal (CDJ) which had already been covered by MEDLINE in 1988. As the CDJ continued to prove its importance in the region, the ADS-ROC decided to move to the international community by publishing an English journal. Hence, the birth of the JDS in 2006. The JDS is indexed in the SCI Expanded since 2008. It is also indexed in Scopus, and EMCare, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases.
The topics covered by the JDS include all fields of basic and clinical dentistry. Some manuscripts focusing on the study of certain endemic diseases such as dental caries and periodontal diseases in particular regions of any country as well as oral pre-cancers, oral cancers, and oral submucous fibrosis related to betel nut chewing habit are also considered for publication. Besides, the JDS also publishes articles about the efficacy of a new treatment modality on oral verrucous hyperplasia or early oral squamous cell carcinoma.