Diagnostic value of the wells score for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients: A case-control study.

IF 1.5
Saeed Kargar-Soleimanabad, Sajjad Najafi, Masoud Ahmadi, Farnaz Godazandeh
{"title":"Diagnostic value of the wells score for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients: A case-control study.","authors":"Saeed Kargar-Soleimanabad, Sajjad Najafi, Masoud Ahmadi, Farnaz Godazandeh","doi":"10.1177/02683555251409995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication among hospitalized patients, necessitating timely diagnosis. The Wells score is widely used for assessing DVT probability; however, its performance in inpatient populations remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Wells criteria for lower extremity DVT among hospitalized patients.MethodsIn this case-control study conducted at two teaching hospitals between 2017 and 2020, 240 patients with confirmed DVT were compared with 240 age- and sex-matched controls without DVT. All participants underwent standardized clinical evaluation and duplex ultrasonography within 24 h of admission. Wells scores were calculated based on predefined clinical parameters. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined.ResultsOf 480 participants (mean age 51.9 ± 11.6 years; 54.4% female), DVT was confirmed in 240 (50%). A Wells score ≥2 classified patients as likely DVT. This threshold yielded a sensitivity of 86.3%, specificity of 70.0%, PPV of 74.2%, and NPV of 83.8%. Significant predictors included recent surgery or prolonged hospitalization (<i>p</i> < 0.001), calf swelling >3 cm (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and pitting edema confined to the symptomatic leg (<i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThe Wells criteria demonstrated good sensitivity and moderate specificity for diagnosing DVT in hospitalized patients, supporting their role as an initial clinical assessment tool. However, they should not replace confirmatory testing such as ultrasonography or D-dimer assays. Larger multicenter studies are warranted to further validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251409995"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251409995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication among hospitalized patients, necessitating timely diagnosis. The Wells score is widely used for assessing DVT probability; however, its performance in inpatient populations remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Wells criteria for lower extremity DVT among hospitalized patients.MethodsIn this case-control study conducted at two teaching hospitals between 2017 and 2020, 240 patients with confirmed DVT were compared with 240 age- and sex-matched controls without DVT. All participants underwent standardized clinical evaluation and duplex ultrasonography within 24 h of admission. Wells scores were calculated based on predefined clinical parameters. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined.ResultsOf 480 participants (mean age 51.9 ± 11.6 years; 54.4% female), DVT was confirmed in 240 (50%). A Wells score ≥2 classified patients as likely DVT. This threshold yielded a sensitivity of 86.3%, specificity of 70.0%, PPV of 74.2%, and NPV of 83.8%. Significant predictors included recent surgery or prolonged hospitalization (p < 0.001), calf swelling >3 cm (p < 0.001), and pitting edema confined to the symptomatic leg (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe Wells criteria demonstrated good sensitivity and moderate specificity for diagnosing DVT in hospitalized patients, supporting their role as an initial clinical assessment tool. However, they should not replace confirmatory testing such as ultrasonography or D-dimer assays. Larger multicenter studies are warranted to further validate these findings.

wells评分对住院患者下肢深静脉血栓的诊断价值:一项病例对照研究。
深静脉血栓形成(DVT)是住院患者中一种常见且可能危及生命的并发症,需要及时诊断。Wells评分被广泛用于评估DVT概率;然而,它在住院人群中的表现仍不确定。本研究旨在评估Wells标准对住院患者下肢深静脉血栓的诊断准确性。方法本研究于2017年至2020年在两家教学医院进行,将240例确诊DVT患者与240例年龄和性别匹配的无DVT对照组进行比较。所有参与者在入院24小时内进行标准化临床评估和双超声检查。Wells评分根据预先设定的临床参数计算。测定敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果480名参与者(平均年龄51.9±11.6岁,女性54.4%)中,240人(50%)确诊DVT。Wells评分≥2分为可能深静脉血栓形成。该阈值的敏感性为86.3%,特异性为70.0%,PPV为74.2%,NPV为83.8%。重要的预测因素包括近期手术或长期住院(p < 0.001)、小腿肿胀(p < 0.001)和局限于有症状的腿部的凹陷性水肿(p < 0.001)。结论Wells标准诊断住院患者深静脉血栓具有良好的敏感性和中等的特异性,可作为初步的临床评估工具。然而,它们不应取代确认性检测,如超声检查或d -二聚体测定。需要更大规模的多中心研究来进一步验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书