The power of informal regulation: An evolutionary game and empirical analysis of public concern on regional green innovation

Innovation and Green Development Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-05 DOI:10.1016/j.igd.2026.100325
Zhijian Yu
{"title":"The power of informal regulation: An evolutionary game and empirical analysis of public concern on regional green innovation","authors":"Zhijian Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.igd.2026.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates whether public environmental concern, acting as an informal regulatory pressure, drives regional green technological innovation (GTI) in China. We develop an evolutionary game model of public–innovator interactions to formalize the coordinating role of public pressure in green investment. Leveraging city-level Baidu search data for “PM2.5” from 2011 to 2019 across 289 cities as a proxy for public attention to pollution, we employ an instrumental variable (2SLS) strategy to identify the causal impact on green patent applications. We find that heightened public concern significantly promotes regional GTI; our estimates suggest that a 1 % increase in the public concern index causally increases green patent applications by approximately 2.1 %. Our analysis further uncovers two key transmission channels: an indirect public channel, where citizen concern stimulates increased government investment in environmental governance, and a direct private channel, where public pressure drives private green investment through reputational and market mechanisms. The innovation-promoting effect of public concern is also context-dependent, proving significantly stronger in cities with greater economic capacity, higher baseline levels of pollution, and more developed information environments. These findings highlight the tangible role of public attention in fostering environmental innovation and underscore the distinct yet complementary roles of state responsiveness and market-based mechanisms in a green transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100674,"journal":{"name":"Innovation and Green Development","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation and Green Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753126000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates whether public environmental concern, acting as an informal regulatory pressure, drives regional green technological innovation (GTI) in China. We develop an evolutionary game model of public–innovator interactions to formalize the coordinating role of public pressure in green investment. Leveraging city-level Baidu search data for “PM2.5” from 2011 to 2019 across 289 cities as a proxy for public attention to pollution, we employ an instrumental variable (2SLS) strategy to identify the causal impact on green patent applications. We find that heightened public concern significantly promotes regional GTI; our estimates suggest that a 1 % increase in the public concern index causally increases green patent applications by approximately 2.1 %. Our analysis further uncovers two key transmission channels: an indirect public channel, where citizen concern stimulates increased government investment in environmental governance, and a direct private channel, where public pressure drives private green investment through reputational and market mechanisms. The innovation-promoting effect of public concern is also context-dependent, proving significantly stronger in cities with greater economic capacity, higher baseline levels of pollution, and more developed information environments. These findings highlight the tangible role of public attention in fostering environmental innovation and underscore the distinct yet complementary roles of state responsiveness and market-based mechanisms in a green transition.
非正式规制的力量:区域绿色创新公众关注的演化博弈与实证分析
本文考察了公众环境关注是否作为一种非正式的监管压力推动了中国区域绿色技术创新。本文建立了公共-创新者互动的演化博弈模型,以形式化公共压力在绿色投资中的协调作用。利用2011年至2019年289个城市“PM2.5”的城市级百度搜索数据作为公众对污染关注的代表,我们采用工具变量(2SLS)策略来确定对绿色专利申请的因果影响。研究发现,公众关注度的提高显著促进了区域GTI的发展;我们的估计表明,公众关注指数每增加1%,绿色专利申请就会增加约2.1%。我们的分析进一步揭示了两个关键的传导渠道:一个是间接的公共渠道,公民的关注刺激政府增加对环境治理的投资;另一个是直接的私人渠道,公众压力通过声誉和市场机制推动私人绿色投资。公众关注的创新促进作用也与环境有关,在经济能力更强、基线污染水平更高、信息环境更发达的城市中,公众关注的创新促进作用明显更强。这些发现强调了公众关注在促进环境创新方面的切实作用,并强调了国家响应和市场机制在绿色转型中的独特而互补的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书