Transnational Education as Ecosystem: Rethinking Sustainability and Equity

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jiayi Wang
{"title":"Transnational Education as Ecosystem: Rethinking Sustainability and Equity","authors":"Jiayi Wang","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transnational education (TNE) continues to expand globally, yet many partnerships remain fragile, short-lived or insufficiently connected to local contexts. This study argues that TNE must be reimagined not as a transactional delivery model but as a dynamic ecosystem grounded in equity, sustainability and mutual capacity-building. Drawing on 245 survey responses, 20 stakeholder interviews and more than 1000 regulatory audit findings, the analysis identifies systemic barriers including weak institutional integration, rigid curriculum transfer and fragmented support for students and staff. In response, the paper proposes an ecosystem-based framework that emphasises collaborative governance, contextual adaptation and long-term relational investment. The findings suggest that meaningful TNE partnerships prioritise people, trust and strategic alignment. When approached as ecosystems rather than exports, TNE can support not only academic outcomes but also wider social, economic and institutional development. Sustainable impact requires moving beyond education-to-education transactions towards partnerships designed to endure, evolve and become locally embedded.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70099","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transnational education (TNE) continues to expand globally, yet many partnerships remain fragile, short-lived or insufficiently connected to local contexts. This study argues that TNE must be reimagined not as a transactional delivery model but as a dynamic ecosystem grounded in equity, sustainability and mutual capacity-building. Drawing on 245 survey responses, 20 stakeholder interviews and more than 1000 regulatory audit findings, the analysis identifies systemic barriers including weak institutional integration, rigid curriculum transfer and fragmented support for students and staff. In response, the paper proposes an ecosystem-based framework that emphasises collaborative governance, contextual adaptation and long-term relational investment. The findings suggest that meaningful TNE partnerships prioritise people, trust and strategic alignment. When approached as ecosystems rather than exports, TNE can support not only academic outcomes but also wider social, economic and institutional development. Sustainable impact requires moving beyond education-to-education transactions towards partnerships designed to endure, evolve and become locally embedded.

Abstract Image

跨国教育作为生态系统:对可持续性与公平性的再思考
跨国教育(TNE)继续在全球扩张,但许多伙伴关系仍然脆弱、短暂或与当地情况联系不足。本研究认为,TNE必须重新构想,而不是作为一种交易交付模式,而是作为一个基于公平、可持续性和相互能力建设的动态生态系统。根据245份调查回复、20份利益相关者访谈和1000多份监管审计结果,该分析确定了系统性障碍,包括机构整合薄弱、课程转移僵化以及对学生和员工的零散支持。为此,本文提出了一个基于生态系统的框架,强调协作治理、情境适应和长期关系投资。研究结果表明,有意义的跨国企业伙伴关系优先考虑人、信任和战略一致性。如果将TNE视为生态系统而不是出口,它不仅可以支持学术成果,还可以支持更广泛的社会、经济和制度发展。可持续影响需要超越教育对教育的交易,转向旨在持久、发展和融入当地的伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书