[Efficiency and Usefulness of the Molecular Test 'Biofire®Filmarray® Blood Culture Identification 2' in the Quick Diagnosis of Bacteraemias in a Burns Intensive Care Unit].

Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2025-09-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01
S Bettayeb, S Dhraief, B Maamar, Z Megdiche, H Fredj, A Mokline, A A Messadi, L Thabet
{"title":"[Efficiency and Usefulness of the Molecular Test 'Biofire<sup>®</sup>Filmarray<sup>®</sup> Blood Culture Identification 2' in the Quick Diagnosis of Bacteraemias in a Burns Intensive Care Unit].","authors":"S Bettayeb, S Dhraief, B Maamar, Z Megdiche, H Fredj, A Mokline, A A Messadi, L Thabet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The occurrence of bacteremia during a hospital stay worsens the prognosis of patients. Especially in burn patients, it is one of the most severe infectious complications during their stay in intensive care units, with high mortality rates. Consequently, rapid detection of the pathogens responsible is crucial for the prompt initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy. In our study, we analysed 85 positive blood cultures collected from 66 patients hospitalised in the burns unit and presenting criteria for sepsis. The results of the molecular test FilmArray BCID2 were compared with those of conventional microbiology methods. Overall, the results of the BCID2 panel were concordant with those of conventional culture in 71.8% of cases. For monomicrobial cultures, the concordance of identification was 83.9%, while for polymicrobial cultures the concordance was 36.4%. The test showed a good performance in the detection of pathogens, with an overall sensitivity of 84.5% and specificity of 98.3%; for the panel targets these rates rose to 95.4% and 98.1% respectively. For resistance genes, the BCID2 detected the blaCTX-M gene in 9 enterobacteria and the carbapenemase genes: blaNDM, blaOXA-48- like, blaVIM in 20 BGN. The mecA/C gene was isolated from 5 <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> and for vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> the vanA/B gene was detected in 3 <i>Enterococcus faecuim</i>. The sensitivity and specificity of the test for detecting resistance genes were 84.1% and 92%. The turnaround time (TAT) for molecular test results was 1 hour and 10min (Q1 1.09 h; Q3 1.12 h). The median TAT for BCID2 was significantly (Mann-Whitney, p<0.0001) shorter than for conventional culture 39.1 h (Q1 33 h; Q3 57.6 h). Antimicrobial therapy was modified on the basis of the molecular test results in 35.3% of patients. This was done within a median of 04 hours of receiving the test result [interquartile range 2.4h - 21h]. A favorable outcome was noted in 70% of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"38 3","pages":"241-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12755345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The occurrence of bacteremia during a hospital stay worsens the prognosis of patients. Especially in burn patients, it is one of the most severe infectious complications during their stay in intensive care units, with high mortality rates. Consequently, rapid detection of the pathogens responsible is crucial for the prompt initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy. In our study, we analysed 85 positive blood cultures collected from 66 patients hospitalised in the burns unit and presenting criteria for sepsis. The results of the molecular test FilmArray BCID2 were compared with those of conventional microbiology methods. Overall, the results of the BCID2 panel were concordant with those of conventional culture in 71.8% of cases. For monomicrobial cultures, the concordance of identification was 83.9%, while for polymicrobial cultures the concordance was 36.4%. The test showed a good performance in the detection of pathogens, with an overall sensitivity of 84.5% and specificity of 98.3%; for the panel targets these rates rose to 95.4% and 98.1% respectively. For resistance genes, the BCID2 detected the blaCTX-M gene in 9 enterobacteria and the carbapenemase genes: blaNDM, blaOXA-48- like, blaVIM in 20 BGN. The mecA/C gene was isolated from 5 Staphylococcus epidermidis and for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus the vanA/B gene was detected in 3 Enterococcus faecuim. The sensitivity and specificity of the test for detecting resistance genes were 84.1% and 92%. The turnaround time (TAT) for molecular test results was 1 hour and 10min (Q1 1.09 h; Q3 1.12 h). The median TAT for BCID2 was significantly (Mann-Whitney, p<0.0001) shorter than for conventional culture 39.1 h (Q1 33 h; Q3 57.6 h). Antimicrobial therapy was modified on the basis of the molecular test results in 35.3% of patients. This was done within a median of 04 hours of receiving the test result [interquartile range 2.4h - 21h]. A favorable outcome was noted in 70% of these patients.

[分子检测“Biofire®Filmarray®Blood Culture Identification 2”在烧伤重症监护病房菌血症快速诊断中的有效性和实用性]。
住院期间菌血症的发生恶化了患者的预后。特别是烧伤患者,它是重症监护病房住院期间最严重的感染性并发症之一,死亡率很高。因此,快速检测病原体对于迅速启动有效的抗菌治疗至关重要。在我们的研究中,我们分析了66名烧伤住院患者的85例阳性血培养,并提出了败血症的标准。将FilmArray bccid2分子检测结果与常规微生物学方法进行比较。总体而言,71.8%的病例bccid2与常规培养结果一致。单菌培养物鉴定一致性为83.9%,多菌培养物鉴定一致性为36.4%。该方法对病原菌的检测效果较好,总灵敏度为84.5%,特异度为98.3%;对于小组目标,这两个比率分别上升到95.4%和98.1%。对于耐药基因,bccid2在9种肠杆菌中检测到blaCTX-M基因,在20种肠杆菌中检测到碳青霉烯酶基因blaNDM、blaOXA-48- like、blaVIM。从5株表皮葡萄球菌中分离到mecA/C基因,在3株耐万古霉素肠球菌中检测到vanA/B基因。检测耐药基因的敏感性和特异性分别为84.1%和92%。分子检测结果的周转时间(TAT)为1小时10min (Q1 1.09 h; Q3 1.12 h)。bbcid2的中位TAT显著降低(Mann-Whitney, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书