Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Greek Version of the Diabetes Attitude Scale (DAS-3).

4区 医学 Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Maria Botsari, Petros Galanis, Dimos Mastrogiannis, Sotirios Plakas, Ourania Govina, Eugenia Vlachou, Alexandra Mantoudi, Theodoula Adamakidou, Afroditi Zartaloudi, Stelios Parissopoulos, Paraskevi Apostolara, Triantafyllia Evdoxia Mastrogianni, Fani Botsari, Marianna Mantzorou
{"title":"Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Greek Version of the Diabetes Attitude Scale (DAS-3).","authors":"Maria Botsari, Petros Galanis, Dimos Mastrogiannis, Sotirios Plakas, Ourania Govina, Eugenia Vlachou, Alexandra Mantoudi, Theodoula Adamakidou, Afroditi Zartaloudi, Stelios Parissopoulos, Paraskevi Apostolara, Triantafyllia Evdoxia Mastrogianni, Fani Botsari, Marianna Mantzorou","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-03402-1_15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The knowledge and attitudes of nurses caring for patients with diabetes mellitus should be regularly evaluated using reliable and valid instruments to identify any knowledge gaps and address any negative attitudes, allowing for the implementation of targeted skill development. The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Greek translation of the Diabetes Attitudes Scale (DAS-3) questionnaire. A total of 278 conveniently selected undergraduate nursing students participated in the survey and were administered a questionnaire of sociodemographic and clinical data, the Diabetes Knowledge Test tool and the DAS-3. Factor analysis revealed 4 factors explaining 50% of the variability of the DAS-3; the value of strict glucose control (Cronbach's α = 0.86), the need for special training (Cronbach's α = 0.63), the psychosocial impact of diabetes (Cronbach's α = 0.68), and finally the respect for patient autonomy (Cronbach's α = 0.65). The overall Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient found for the DAS-3 questionnaire was 0.75 indicating good internal reliability. The values of the Pearson correlation coefficients in test-retest assessment varied for the four factors from 0.71 to 0.90 and reflected a moderate to very strong correlation. The good reliability and validity of the DAS-3 contribute to the evaluation of the attitudes of health professionals towards diabetes, becoming a future motivation for improving educational programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7270,"journal":{"name":"Advances in experimental medicine and biology","volume":"1490 ","pages":"137-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in experimental medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03402-1_15","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The knowledge and attitudes of nurses caring for patients with diabetes mellitus should be regularly evaluated using reliable and valid instruments to identify any knowledge gaps and address any negative attitudes, allowing for the implementation of targeted skill development. The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Greek translation of the Diabetes Attitudes Scale (DAS-3) questionnaire. A total of 278 conveniently selected undergraduate nursing students participated in the survey and were administered a questionnaire of sociodemographic and clinical data, the Diabetes Knowledge Test tool and the DAS-3. Factor analysis revealed 4 factors explaining 50% of the variability of the DAS-3; the value of strict glucose control (Cronbach's α = 0.86), the need for special training (Cronbach's α = 0.63), the psychosocial impact of diabetes (Cronbach's α = 0.68), and finally the respect for patient autonomy (Cronbach's α = 0.65). The overall Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient found for the DAS-3 questionnaire was 0.75 indicating good internal reliability. The values of the Pearson correlation coefficients in test-retest assessment varied for the four factors from 0.71 to 0.90 and reflected a moderate to very strong correlation. The good reliability and validity of the DAS-3 contribute to the evaluation of the attitudes of health professionals towards diabetes, becoming a future motivation for improving educational programs.

希腊版糖尿病态度量表(DAS-3)的文化适应和心理测量特征。
应使用可靠有效的工具定期评估护理糖尿病患者的护士的知识和态度,以确定任何知识差距并解决任何消极态度,从而实施有针对性的技能发展。本研究的目的是检验糖尿病态度量表(DAS-3)的希腊文译本的效度和信度。随机抽取278名本科护生参加调查,采用社会人口学和临床资料问卷、糖尿病知识测试工具和DAS-3进行问卷调查。因子分析显示4个因素解释了50%的DAS-3变异;严格控制血糖的值(Cronbach’s α = 0.86)、特殊训练的需要(Cronbach’s α = 0.63)、糖尿病的心理社会影响(Cronbach’s α = 0.68),最后是对患者自主权的尊重(Cronbach’s α = 0.65)。DAS-3问卷的整体Cronbach's alpha内部一致性系数为0.75,表明内部信度良好。4个因素在重测评估中的Pearson相关系数值在0.71 ~ 0.90之间变化,反映出中等到很强的相关性。DAS-3具有良好的信度和效度,有助于评估卫生专业人员对糖尿病的态度,成为未来改进教育计划的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in experimental medicine and biology
Advances in experimental medicine and biology 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology provides a platform for scientific contributions in the main disciplines of the biomedicine and the life sciences. This series publishes thematic volumes on contemporary research in the areas of microbiology, immunology, neurosciences, biochemistry, biomedical engineering, genetics, physiology, and cancer research. Covering emerging topics and techniques in basic and clinical science, it brings together clinicians and researchers from various fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书