EEG biomarkers for a precision-medicine approach to noninvasive brain stimulation for major depressive disorder

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2025.112121
Rubén Romero-Marín , Davide Cappon , Javier Solana-Sánchez , David Bartrés-Faz , Álvaro Pascual-Leone , Gabriele Cattaneo
{"title":"EEG biomarkers for a precision-medicine approach to noninvasive brain stimulation for major depressive disorder","authors":"Rubén Romero-Marín ,&nbsp;Davide Cappon ,&nbsp;Javier Solana-Sánchez ,&nbsp;David Bartrés-Faz ,&nbsp;Álvaro Pascual-Leone ,&nbsp;Gabriele Cattaneo","doi":"10.1016/j.pscychresns.2025.112121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and disabling condition with high rates of treatment resistance. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), has emerged as a promising option for individuals unresponsive to pharmacotherapy. However, many patients still fail to achieve meaningful improvement, underscoring the need for reliable biomarkers of treatment response. Electroencephalography (EEG) and combined TMS-EEG are increasingly explored as predictive tools because they index cortical excitability, connectivity and neuroplasticity. In this systematic review, we synthesize evidence from 18 high-quality studies evaluating EEG and TMS-EEG biomarkers of NIBS outcomes in MDD. Resting-state EEG studies highlight the relevance of spectral power alterations, frontal alpha asymmetry and connectivity measures, whereas TMS-EEG work emphasizes TMS-evoked potentials, particularly N100 and N45 components, in forecasting clinical response. Although results are encouraging, methodological heterogeneity, modest sample sizes and divergent stimulation protocols limit immediate clinical implementation. Nonetheless, converging findings indicate that pre-treatment EEG and TMS-EEG assessments can support a precision-medicine approach by informing target selection and stimulation parameters. Systematic integration of these neurophysiological markers could enhance personalization of NIBS, increase response rates and advance the development of mechanism-based interventions for depression across diverse patient profiles and clinical settings worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20776,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","volume":"357 ","pages":"Article 112121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925492725001763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and disabling condition with high rates of treatment resistance. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), has emerged as a promising option for individuals unresponsive to pharmacotherapy. However, many patients still fail to achieve meaningful improvement, underscoring the need for reliable biomarkers of treatment response. Electroencephalography (EEG) and combined TMS-EEG are increasingly explored as predictive tools because they index cortical excitability, connectivity and neuroplasticity. In this systematic review, we synthesize evidence from 18 high-quality studies evaluating EEG and TMS-EEG biomarkers of NIBS outcomes in MDD. Resting-state EEG studies highlight the relevance of spectral power alterations, frontal alpha asymmetry and connectivity measures, whereas TMS-EEG work emphasizes TMS-evoked potentials, particularly N100 and N45 components, in forecasting clinical response. Although results are encouraging, methodological heterogeneity, modest sample sizes and divergent stimulation protocols limit immediate clinical implementation. Nonetheless, converging findings indicate that pre-treatment EEG and TMS-EEG assessments can support a precision-medicine approach by informing target selection and stimulation parameters. Systematic integration of these neurophysiological markers could enhance personalization of NIBS, increase response rates and advance the development of mechanism-based interventions for depression across diverse patient profiles and clinical settings worldwide.
脑电图生物标记物对重性抑郁症无创脑刺激的精准医学方法
重度抑郁症(MDD)是一种普遍的致残性疾病,具有很高的治疗耐药性。非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS),包括经颅磁刺激(TMS)和经颅电刺激(tES),已经成为对药物治疗无反应的个体的一种有希望的选择。然而,许多患者仍未能取得有意义的改善,这强调了对可靠的治疗反应生物标志物的需求。脑电图(EEG)和联合TMS-EEG越来越多地被探索作为预测工具,因为它们反映皮层兴奋性、连通性和神经可塑性。在这篇系统综述中,我们综合了来自18项高质量研究的证据,这些研究评估了重度抑郁症患者NIBS结局的EEG和TMS-EEG生物标志物。静息状态脑电图研究强调了谱功率改变、额叶α不对称和连通性测量的相关性,而TMS-EEG研究强调tms诱发电位,特别是N100和N45成分,在预测临床反应方面的作用。虽然结果令人鼓舞,但方法的异质性、适度的样本量和不同的刺激方案限制了立即的临床实施。尽管如此,趋同的研究结果表明,治疗前脑电图和TMS-EEG评估可以通过告知目标选择和刺激参数来支持精确医学方法。这些神经生理标志物的系统整合可以增强NIBS的个性化,提高反应率,并推动基于机制的抑郁症干预措施在全球不同患者概况和临床环境中的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Neuroimaging section of Psychiatry Research publishes manuscripts on positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized electroencephalographic topography, regional cerebral blood flow, computed tomography, magnetoencephalography, autoradiography, post-mortem regional analyses, and other imaging techniques. Reports concerning results in psychiatric disorders, dementias, and the effects of behaviorial tasks and pharmacological treatments are featured. We also invite manuscripts on the methods of obtaining images and computer processing of the images themselves. Selected case reports are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书