AI-driven HRM digitization in effect: Mechanisms, conditions, and employee outcomes

IF 14 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2025.100919
Ahsan Ali , Dariusz Cichoń , Asad Abbas
{"title":"AI-driven HRM digitization in effect: Mechanisms, conditions, and employee outcomes","authors":"Ahsan Ali ,&nbsp;Dariusz Cichoń ,&nbsp;Asad Abbas","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in contemporary organizations as a tool for digitizing systems and reconfiguring key functions such as human resource management (HRM). However, not all employees exposed to AI-driven HRM digitization benefit equally in their capacity to generate innovative outcomes. Drawing on self-determination theory and integrating perspectives from organizational learning, this study advances a moderated mediation model that explains how and when AI-enabled HRM digitization fosters innovation. We propose that, while AI-driven HRM practices can stimulate the metacognitive strategies of employees, the extent to which these strategies translate into enhanced innovation depends critically on their tacit knowledge awareness. In this proposal, we highlight the paradoxical nature of algorithmic systems: they may serve as autonomy-supportive tools that encourage exploration and self-directed learning or as autonomy-controlling mechanisms that intensify monitoring and reduce intrinsic motivation. Using a multi-wave, multi-source field study of Chinese employees and supervisors (<em>N</em> = 347), we found that AI-driven HRM positively predicts innovation through metacognitive strategies, but only when employees demonstrate high levels of tacit knowledge awareness. When awareness is low, AI-HRM digitization fails to enhance innovation, which reveals the limitations of digital HRM effectiveness. These findings underscore that tacit knowledge awareness fundamentally conditions how AI-driven HRM digitization supports or undermines innovation, which advances theory by extending self-determination perspectives to technology-mediated HRM. Thus, this study discusses the theoretical and practical implications for designing AI-enabled HRM systems that balance algorithmic control with employee autonomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100919"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25002641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in contemporary organizations as a tool for digitizing systems and reconfiguring key functions such as human resource management (HRM). However, not all employees exposed to AI-driven HRM digitization benefit equally in their capacity to generate innovative outcomes. Drawing on self-determination theory and integrating perspectives from organizational learning, this study advances a moderated mediation model that explains how and when AI-enabled HRM digitization fosters innovation. We propose that, while AI-driven HRM practices can stimulate the metacognitive strategies of employees, the extent to which these strategies translate into enhanced innovation depends critically on their tacit knowledge awareness. In this proposal, we highlight the paradoxical nature of algorithmic systems: they may serve as autonomy-supportive tools that encourage exploration and self-directed learning or as autonomy-controlling mechanisms that intensify monitoring and reduce intrinsic motivation. Using a multi-wave, multi-source field study of Chinese employees and supervisors (N = 347), we found that AI-driven HRM positively predicts innovation through metacognitive strategies, but only when employees demonstrate high levels of tacit knowledge awareness. When awareness is low, AI-HRM digitization fails to enhance innovation, which reveals the limitations of digital HRM effectiveness. These findings underscore that tacit knowledge awareness fundamentally conditions how AI-driven HRM digitization supports or undermines innovation, which advances theory by extending self-determination perspectives to technology-mediated HRM. Thus, this study discusses the theoretical and practical implications for designing AI-enabled HRM systems that balance algorithmic control with employee autonomy.
人工智能驱动的人力资源管理数字化:机制、条件和员工成果
人工智能(AI)越来越多地用于现代组织,作为数字化系统和重新配置关键功能(如人力资源管理(HRM))的工具。然而,并不是所有接受人工智能驱动的人力资源管理数字化的员工在产生创新成果的能力上都能同样受益。利用自我决定理论并整合组织学习的观点,本研究提出了一个有调节的中介模型,该模型解释了人工智能支持的人力资源管理数字化如何以及何时促进创新。我们认为,虽然人工智能驱动的人力资源管理实践可以激发员工的元认知策略,但这些策略转化为增强创新的程度关键取决于他们的隐性知识意识。在本提案中,我们强调了算法系统的矛盾本质:它们可以作为鼓励探索和自主学习的自主支持工具,也可以作为加强监控和减少内在动机的自主控制机制。通过对中国员工和主管(N = 347)的多波、多源实地研究,我们发现人工智能驱动的人力资源管理通过元认知策略积极预测创新,但只有当员工表现出高水平的隐性知识意识时。在认知度较低的情况下,人工智能人力资源管理数字化并不能增强创新能力,从而暴露出数字化人力资源管理有效性的局限性。这些发现强调,隐性知识意识从根本上决定了人工智能驱动的人力资源管理数字化如何支持或破坏创新,这通过将自决视角扩展到技术介导的人力资源管理来推进理论。因此,本研究讨论了设计人工智能支持的人力资源管理系统的理论和实践意义,以平衡算法控制与员工自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书