Early-onset of rapid deposition rates of the Mangshan loess challenges the classical hypothesis of full Yellow River connection during the late Pleistocene

IF 3.2 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Geomorphology Pub Date : 2026-02-15 Epub Date: 2025-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110149
Yingyong Chen , Xiaodong Miao
{"title":"Early-onset of rapid deposition rates of the Mangshan loess challenges the classical hypothesis of full Yellow River connection during the late Pleistocene","authors":"Yingyong Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Miao","doi":"10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the origin and evolution of the Yellow River is not only crucial for understanding the geomorphic and climatic history, but also pivotal due to its historical significance and ecological impact on China's environment. However, the timing of the full connection of the Yellow River, as a critical event in the genesis of this major river system, is still debated continuously. Among various competing hypotheses, the abrupt increase of deposition rates followin<u>g</u> paleosol 2 (S2 of Chinese loess sequence, starting at about 0.245 Ma at the late Pleistocene) of the Mangshan loess was considered as major evidence of the late Pleistocene hypothesis, which attributes this increase to a sudden connection of the Yellow River. Here we scrutinized the stratigraphy of the Mangshan loess and identified abrupt increase of deposition rates occurring significantly earlier (at layers L11, S10, S9, L8, L7, L3) than S2, undermining the late Pleistocene hypothesis of the Yellow River genesis in the perspective of time. Moreover, we attribute the abrupt deposition rates to episodic gully erosion of the Loess Plateau, a mechanism distinct from the late Pleistocene full-river connection hypothesis. Therefore, the hypothesis that the Yellow River fully connected during the late Pleistocene is mechanistically unsupported, suggesting this connection likely occurred much earlier than 0.245 Ma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55115,"journal":{"name":"Geomorphology","volume":"495 ","pages":"Article 110149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomorphology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X25005598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the origin and evolution of the Yellow River is not only crucial for understanding the geomorphic and climatic history, but also pivotal due to its historical significance and ecological impact on China's environment. However, the timing of the full connection of the Yellow River, as a critical event in the genesis of this major river system, is still debated continuously. Among various competing hypotheses, the abrupt increase of deposition rates following paleosol 2 (S2 of Chinese loess sequence, starting at about 0.245 Ma at the late Pleistocene) of the Mangshan loess was considered as major evidence of the late Pleistocene hypothesis, which attributes this increase to a sudden connection of the Yellow River. Here we scrutinized the stratigraphy of the Mangshan loess and identified abrupt increase of deposition rates occurring significantly earlier (at layers L11, S10, S9, L8, L7, L3) than S2, undermining the late Pleistocene hypothesis of the Yellow River genesis in the perspective of time. Moreover, we attribute the abrupt deposition rates to episodic gully erosion of the Loess Plateau, a mechanism distinct from the late Pleistocene full-river connection hypothesis. Therefore, the hypothesis that the Yellow River fully connected during the late Pleistocene is mechanistically unsupported, suggesting this connection likely occurred much earlier than 0.245 Ma.
芒山黄土早发的快速沉积速率挑战了黄河在晚更新世完全贯通的经典假说
了解黄河的起源和演变不仅对了解地貌和气候历史至关重要,而且由于其历史意义和对中国环境的生态影响而至关重要。然而,作为这一主要水系形成过程中的一个关键事件,黄河完全贯通的时间仍然存在争议。在各种相互竞争的假说中,从晚更新世约0.245 Ma开始的古土壤2(中国黄土序列S2)沉积速率的突然增加被认为是晚更新世假说的主要证据,该假说将这种增加归因于黄河的突然连接。通过对芒山黄土地层的研究,发现其沉积速率的急剧增加(L11、S10、S9、L8、L7、L3层)明显早于S2层,从时间上破坏了黄河成因的晚更新世假说。此外,我们将突变沉积速率归因于黄土高原的幕式沟蚀,这一机制与晚更新世全河连接假说不同。因此,黄河在晚更新世完全连通的假设在力学上是不支持的,表明这种连接可能发生在0.245 Ma之前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geomorphology
Geomorphology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Our journal''s scope includes geomorphic themes of: tectonics and regional structure; glacial processes and landforms; fluvial sequences, Quaternary environmental change and dating; fluvial processes and landforms; mass movement, slopes and periglacial processes; hillslopes and soil erosion; weathering, karst and soils; aeolian processes and landforms, coastal dunes and arid environments; coastal and marine processes, estuaries and lakes; modelling, theoretical and quantitative geomorphology; DEM, GIS and remote sensing methods and applications; hazards, applied and planetary geomorphology; and volcanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书