{"title":"Assessing machine learning predictions of austenitic steel compositions for optimum mechanical response","authors":"Linh Thi Hoai Nguyen , Kaveh Edalati , Vijayvargia Kshitij , Mohsen Dadfarnia , Aleksandar Staykov , Toshihiro Tsuchiyama , Masanobu Kubota , Hisao Matsunaga , Jessica Anne Krogstad , Petros Sofronis","doi":"10.1016/j.msea.2025.149714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding and predicting mechanical properties such as proof stress (yield strength), ultimate tensile strength, elongation to failure, and reduction in area are essential for screening the application of austenitic stainless steels in adverse chemomechanical environments. However, experimental determination of these properties is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly—especially under extreme conditions, which requires advanced experimental capabilities. In this study, we leverage a large-scale, curated dataset comprising 2180 experimental entries of austenitic alloys to develop machine learning (ML) models capable of predicting these key mechanical properties as <em>functions of composition, solution treatment condition, and testing temperature</em>. We systematically evaluate a range of ML algorithms, namely linear regression, kernel ridge regression, extreme gradient boosting, and artificial neural network. Among these, the extreme gradient boosting achieves the highest predictive accuracy, with <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> scores of 0.946 and 0.985 for proof stress and ultimate tensile strength, respectively. To further enhance model performance, we explore ensemble learning and transfer learning strategies. The transfer learning approach that leverages interdependencies between mechanical properties reduces the mean percentage error by 21.0% and increases <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> score by 3.1% in predicting reduction in area, compared to the original artificial neural network model. Our results show that ML models trained on well-structured experimental data can serve as an efficient and reliable tool for exploring the effect of composition on screening metrics. This work highlights the potential of data-driven approaches to accelerate the design and optimization of high-performance austenitic alloys. Furthermore, obtaining feature importance and insights from extreme gradient boosting using Shapley Additive Explanation tool provides valuable understanding of how features contribute to the prediction of mechanical properties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":385,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science and Engineering: A","volume":"953 ","pages":"Article 149714"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science and Engineering: A","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921509325019380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding and predicting mechanical properties such as proof stress (yield strength), ultimate tensile strength, elongation to failure, and reduction in area are essential for screening the application of austenitic stainless steels in adverse chemomechanical environments. However, experimental determination of these properties is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly—especially under extreme conditions, which requires advanced experimental capabilities. In this study, we leverage a large-scale, curated dataset comprising 2180 experimental entries of austenitic alloys to develop machine learning (ML) models capable of predicting these key mechanical properties as functions of composition, solution treatment condition, and testing temperature. We systematically evaluate a range of ML algorithms, namely linear regression, kernel ridge regression, extreme gradient boosting, and artificial neural network. Among these, the extreme gradient boosting achieves the highest predictive accuracy, with scores of 0.946 and 0.985 for proof stress and ultimate tensile strength, respectively. To further enhance model performance, we explore ensemble learning and transfer learning strategies. The transfer learning approach that leverages interdependencies between mechanical properties reduces the mean percentage error by 21.0% and increases score by 3.1% in predicting reduction in area, compared to the original artificial neural network model. Our results show that ML models trained on well-structured experimental data can serve as an efficient and reliable tool for exploring the effect of composition on screening metrics. This work highlights the potential of data-driven approaches to accelerate the design and optimization of high-performance austenitic alloys. Furthermore, obtaining feature importance and insights from extreme gradient boosting using Shapley Additive Explanation tool provides valuable understanding of how features contribute to the prediction of mechanical properties.
期刊介绍:
Materials Science and Engineering A provides an international medium for the publication of theoretical and experimental studies related to the load-bearing capacity of materials as influenced by their basic properties, processing history, microstructure and operating environment. Appropriate submissions to Materials Science and Engineering A should include scientific and/or engineering factors which affect the microstructure - strength relationships of materials and report the changes to mechanical behavior.