Hybrid monitoring framework for geological CO2 storage: Comparative insights from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and conventional techniques

Carbon Capture Science & Technology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100561
Zahrah Ghannam , Mazin Osman , Omer Mohamed Bakri , Mohamed Mahmoud , Muhammad Shahzad Kamal , Rahul Gajbhiye , Ahmed Abdulhamid Mahmoud
{"title":"Hybrid monitoring framework for geological CO2 storage: Comparative insights from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and conventional techniques","authors":"Zahrah Ghannam ,&nbsp;Mazin Osman ,&nbsp;Omer Mohamed Bakri ,&nbsp;Mohamed Mahmoud ,&nbsp;Muhammad Shahzad Kamal ,&nbsp;Rahul Gajbhiye ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdulhamid Mahmoud","doi":"10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective tracking of the geological carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) storage is very important in ensuring the safety of the environment and adherence to storage rules. This review discusses the classic geophysical techniques such as 4D seismic, electromagnetic (EM), and gravimetry and their abilities are compared to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), which is an emerging technology that improves monitoring on a microscopic scale. Conventional methods are appropriate to map the movement of plumes and structural variations but are not good enough to see important processes such as residual trapping, changes in wettability, and fluid dynamics at the pore-scale. Conversely, NMR quantitatively describes fluid interactions and phase behavior at the pore level and is able to give quantitative information on CO<sub>2</sub> saturation and trapping processes.</div><div>This review shed light on how NMR, under a combination with conventional geophysical methods, can form a hybrid monitoring system that can offer the pore-scale accuracy of the monitoring approach, and the field-scale extent of the monitoring framework. Through machine learning, built-in workflows now can combine seismic, pressure, and fluid chemistry data increasing predictive accuracy and uncertainty quantification. This hybrid monitoring method will greatly enhance the credibility of the CO<sub>2</sub> storage measurements through the real-time identification of the possible leakage and the reservoir maintenance. Future CO<sub>2</sub> storage projects can realize this by placing NMR in greater monitoring networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9387,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772656825001988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective tracking of the geological carbon dioxide (CO2) storage is very important in ensuring the safety of the environment and adherence to storage rules. This review discusses the classic geophysical techniques such as 4D seismic, electromagnetic (EM), and gravimetry and their abilities are compared to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), which is an emerging technology that improves monitoring on a microscopic scale. Conventional methods are appropriate to map the movement of plumes and structural variations but are not good enough to see important processes such as residual trapping, changes in wettability, and fluid dynamics at the pore-scale. Conversely, NMR quantitatively describes fluid interactions and phase behavior at the pore level and is able to give quantitative information on CO2 saturation and trapping processes.
This review shed light on how NMR, under a combination with conventional geophysical methods, can form a hybrid monitoring system that can offer the pore-scale accuracy of the monitoring approach, and the field-scale extent of the monitoring framework. Through machine learning, built-in workflows now can combine seismic, pressure, and fluid chemistry data increasing predictive accuracy and uncertainty quantification. This hybrid monitoring method will greatly enhance the credibility of the CO2 storage measurements through the real-time identification of the possible leakage and the reservoir maintenance. Future CO2 storage projects can realize this by placing NMR in greater monitoring networks.
地质二氧化碳储存的混合监测框架:来自核磁共振(NMR)和传统技术的比较见解
有效的地质二氧化碳封存跟踪对确保环境安全、遵守封存规则具有十分重要的意义。本文讨论了经典的地球物理技术,如四维地震、电磁(EM)和重力测量,并将它们的能力与核磁共振(NMR)进行了比较,核磁共振是一种新兴的技术,可以改善微观尺度的监测。传统的方法适合于绘制羽流的运动和结构变化,但不足以在孔隙尺度上观察残余捕获、润湿性变化和流体动力学等重要过程。相反,核磁共振定量描述流体相互作用和孔隙水平的相行为,并能够提供二氧化碳饱和度和捕获过程的定量信息。这篇综述揭示了核磁共振如何与传统的地球物理方法相结合,形成一个混合监测系统,可以提供监测方法的孔隙尺度精度和监测框架的现场尺度范围。通过机器学习,内置工作流程现在可以结合地震、压力和流体化学数据,提高预测准确性和不确定性量化。这种混合监测方法通过实时识别可能的泄漏和对储层的维护,大大提高了CO2储存测量的可信度。未来的二氧化碳储存项目可以通过将核磁共振放置在更大的监测网络中来实现这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书