Lake carbon storage as environmental impact indicator: A multi-decadal assessment framework for evaluating sustainable development pathways

IF 12.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108325
Zijie Zhang, Yishuai Ma, Jinhui Jeanne Huang
{"title":"Lake carbon storage as environmental impact indicator: A multi-decadal assessment framework for evaluating sustainable development pathways","authors":"Zijie Zhang,&nbsp;Yishuai Ma,&nbsp;Jinhui Jeanne Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid environmental impact assessment (EIA) of urban development traditionally relies on static indicators that fail to capture cumulative effects and sustainability transitions. We develop an innovative impact assessment framework using dissolved organic carbon (DOC) storage as a sensitive environmental indicator to evaluate the cumulative impacts of economic development policies. Our methodology integrates 36 years (1987–2022) of Landsat-derived chromophoric dissolved organic matter data, lake bathymetry, landscape pattern analysis, and composite socioeconomic indices to quantify column-integrated DOC dynamics in China's Chaohu Lake. The framework reveals that while DOC storage declined overall (−0.065 g m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), landscape drivers dominated system responses, with grassland degradation (29.5 %) and fragmentation (16.3 %) emerging as primary impact factors. Critically, our Tapio decoupling analysis exposes hidden sustainability trade-offs: long-term strong decoupling between DOC loss and urbanization indices demonstrated “green development” effectiveness, yet rapid industrial restructuring policies (2017–2018) triggered expansive coupling and negative decoupling states, temporarily reversing environmental gains. This methodological advancement transforms EIA from reactive project evaluation to proactive sustainability monitoring, establishing lake carbon storage as a transferable early-warning indicator for policy-environment interactions. The framework enables planners to quantitatively assess whether economic transitions remain within planetary carbon limits while advancing Sustainable Development Goal 11, providing a paradigm shift towards adaptive EIA for sustainable urban development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 108325"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525005220","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid environmental impact assessment (EIA) of urban development traditionally relies on static indicators that fail to capture cumulative effects and sustainability transitions. We develop an innovative impact assessment framework using dissolved organic carbon (DOC) storage as a sensitive environmental indicator to evaluate the cumulative impacts of economic development policies. Our methodology integrates 36 years (1987–2022) of Landsat-derived chromophoric dissolved organic matter data, lake bathymetry, landscape pattern analysis, and composite socioeconomic indices to quantify column-integrated DOC dynamics in China's Chaohu Lake. The framework reveals that while DOC storage declined overall (−0.065 g m−2 yr−1), landscape drivers dominated system responses, with grassland degradation (29.5 %) and fragmentation (16.3 %) emerging as primary impact factors. Critically, our Tapio decoupling analysis exposes hidden sustainability trade-offs: long-term strong decoupling between DOC loss and urbanization indices demonstrated “green development” effectiveness, yet rapid industrial restructuring policies (2017–2018) triggered expansive coupling and negative decoupling states, temporarily reversing environmental gains. This methodological advancement transforms EIA from reactive project evaluation to proactive sustainability monitoring, establishing lake carbon storage as a transferable early-warning indicator for policy-environment interactions. The framework enables planners to quantitatively assess whether economic transitions remain within planetary carbon limits while advancing Sustainable Development Goal 11, providing a paradigm shift towards adaptive EIA for sustainable urban development.
湖泊碳储量作为环境影响指标:评价可持续发展路径的多年评估框架
城市发展的快速环境影响评估传统上依赖于静态指标,这些指标无法捕捉累积效应和可持续性转变。我们开发了一个创新的影响评估框架,将溶解有机碳(DOC)储量作为一个敏感的环境指标来评估经济发展政策的累积影响。我们的方法整合了36年(1987-2022)的陆地卫星数据、湖泊水深、景观格局分析和综合社会经济指数,量化了中国巢湖的柱集成DOC动态。该框架显示,虽然DOC储量总体下降(- 0.065 gm−2 yr−1),但景观驱动因素主导了系统响应,草地退化(29.5%)和破碎化(16.3%)成为主要影响因素。重要的是,我们的Tapio脱钩分析揭示了潜在的可持续性权衡:DOC损失与城市化指数之间的长期强脱钩表明了“绿色发展”的有效性,但快速的产业结构调整政策(2017-2018年)引发了扩张性耦合和负脱钩状态,暂时逆转了环境收益。这一方法上的进步将环境影响评估从被动的项目评估转变为主动的可持续性监测,将湖泊碳储量建立为政策-环境相互作用的可转移预警指标。该框架使规划者能够在推进可持续发展目标11的同时,定量评估经济转型是否仍在地球碳限制范围内,为可持续城市发展提供适应性环境影响评估的范式转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书