Effect of print orientation on the dimensional accuracy of three-dimensional-printed complete denture models: A comparative analysis of VAT photopolymerization and fused deposition modeling technologies.

IF 1.3 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Neeraj Kumar Chandraker, Gopi Naveen Chander, Rajendra Kumar Dubey
{"title":"Effect of print orientation on the dimensional accuracy of three-dimensional-printed complete denture models: A comparative analysis of VAT photopolymerization and fused deposition modeling technologies.","authors":"Neeraj Kumar Chandraker, Gopi Naveen Chander, Rajendra Kumar Dubey","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_334_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of print orientation (0°, 45°, and 90°) on the dimensional accuracy, precision, and production parameters of three-dimensional (3D) printed complete denture models fabricated using VAT photopolymerization and fused deposition modeling (FDM) technologies.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>An in-vitro experimental comparative study was conducted to analyze orientation-dependent variations in dimensional trueness and precision among denture models fabricated with two additive manufacturing systems.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A complete denture prosthesis STL file was fabricated in 60 samples using VAT photopolymerization and FDM technologies across three orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°). Printed models underwent postprocessing, followed by digital superimposition to evaluate trueness and precision.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's honestly significant difference tests and independent t-tests for intertechnology comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VAT prints demonstrated higher average accuracy (mean deviation: 0.1106 mm) but greater variability (standard deviation [SD] =0.2448 mm) than FDM (mean deviation: 0.0316 mm, SD = 0.1558 mm). Across both technologies, the 0° orientation showed the least deviation (VAT: 0.1106 mm and FDM: 0.0316 mm). ANOVA indicated no significant differences among orientations (P = 0.109), whereas t-tests revealed substantial differences between technologies (t = 16.46, P < 0.00001). FDM at 90° exhibited the lowest variability (SD = 0.1163 mm), suggesting a trend toward improved consistency, though this did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Print orientation influenced dimensional accuracy trends, but only technology type showed statistically significant differences. VAT photopolymerization is suitable for high-precision applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"26 1","pages":"24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12912512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_334_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of print orientation (0°, 45°, and 90°) on the dimensional accuracy, precision, and production parameters of three-dimensional (3D) printed complete denture models fabricated using VAT photopolymerization and fused deposition modeling (FDM) technologies.

Settings and design: An in-vitro experimental comparative study was conducted to analyze orientation-dependent variations in dimensional trueness and precision among denture models fabricated with two additive manufacturing systems.

Materials and methods: A complete denture prosthesis STL file was fabricated in 60 samples using VAT photopolymerization and FDM technologies across three orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°). Printed models underwent postprocessing, followed by digital superimposition to evaluate trueness and precision.

Statistical analysis used: Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's honestly significant difference tests and independent t-tests for intertechnology comparison.

Results: VAT prints demonstrated higher average accuracy (mean deviation: 0.1106 mm) but greater variability (standard deviation [SD] =0.2448 mm) than FDM (mean deviation: 0.0316 mm, SD = 0.1558 mm). Across both technologies, the 0° orientation showed the least deviation (VAT: 0.1106 mm and FDM: 0.0316 mm). ANOVA indicated no significant differences among orientations (P = 0.109), whereas t-tests revealed substantial differences between technologies (t = 16.46, P < 0.00001). FDM at 90° exhibited the lowest variability (SD = 0.1163 mm), suggesting a trend toward improved consistency, though this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: Print orientation influenced dimensional accuracy trends, but only technology type showed statistically significant differences. VAT photopolymerization is suitable for high-precision applications.

打印方向对三维打印全口义齿模型尺寸精度的影响:VAT光聚合和熔融沉积建模技术的对比分析。
目的:评估打印方向(0°、45°和90°)对使用VAT光聚合和熔融沉积建模(FDM)技术制作的三维(3D)打印全口义齿模型的尺寸精度、精度和生产参数的影响。设置与设计:通过体外实验对比研究,分析了两种增材制造系统制造的义齿模型在尺寸真实度和精度方面的取向依赖性变化。材料和方法:采用VAT光聚合和FDM技术在3个方向(0°,45°和90°)上制作了60个样品的全口义齿STL文件。打印模型进行后处理,然后进行数字叠加,以评估真实感和精度。采用统计分析:统计分析采用单因素方差分析,采用事后Tukey's诚实显著性差异检验和独立t检验进行技术间比较。结果:VAT打印的平均精度(平均偏差:0.1106 mm)高于FDM(平均偏差:0.0316 mm, SD = 0.1558 mm),但变异性更大(标准差[SD] =0.2448 mm)。在这两种技术中,0°取向的偏差最小(VAT: 0.1106 mm, FDM: 0.0316 mm)。方差分析显示取向之间无显著差异(P = 0.109),而t检验显示技术之间存在显著差异(t = 16.46, P < 0.00001)。FDM在90°时表现出最低的变异性(SD = 0.1163 mm),表明一致性有改善的趋势,尽管这没有达到统计学意义。结论:印刷方向影响尺寸精度趋势,但仅技术类型有统计学差异。还原光聚合适用于高精度应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书