Comparative evaluation of mechanical properties between dual-layer and bonded three-dimensional printed denture base materials: An in vitro study.

IF 1.3 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Naveen Gopi Chander, Aryan Shivaji Deshmukh, Harini Gnana Prakash, Vigneshvar Kandaswamy Srinivasan
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of mechanical properties between dual-layer and bonded three-dimensional printed denture base materials: An in vitro study.","authors":"Naveen Gopi Chander, Aryan Shivaji Deshmukh, Harini Gnana Prakash, Vigneshvar Kandaswamy Srinivasan","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_403_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to compare the flexural strength, fracture toughness, and impact strength of the denture base materials fabricated using dual-layer and bonded 3D printing techniques.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>In vitro comparative study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-two bar-shaped samples were fabricated using a digital light processing 3D printer and were divided into 2 groups (n = 36 each). Group I samples were fabricated by dual-layer technique, with the denture base and tooth-colored resins were printed sequentially in a single print cycle. Group II samples were printed separately and bonded with denture base resin. Flexural strength and fracture toughness were tested according to ISO 20795-1:2013, and impact strength was evaluated using ASTM D-256.Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis comprised Shapiro-Wilk for normality, t-test for flexural strength, and Mann-Whitney U-test for fracture toughness and impact strength (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group I exhibited significantly higher flexural strength (82.78 ± 2.02 MPa) and fracture toughness (89.91 ± 0.53 MPa) compared to Group II (80.01 ± 2.69 MPa and 86.93 ± 2.29 MPa, respectively). Conversely, impact strength was greater in Group II (4.17 ± 0.39 J) than in Group I (3.00 ± 1.04 J) (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dual-layer printing technique improved the flexural and fracture resistance of denture base materials by eliminating interfacial weaknesses. Although bonded resins exhibited higher impact strength, the structural advantages of dual-printing support its application in clinical prosthodontics.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"26 1","pages":"63-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12912529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_403_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to compare the flexural strength, fracture toughness, and impact strength of the denture base materials fabricated using dual-layer and bonded 3D printing techniques.

Settings and design: In vitro comparative study.

Materials and methods: Seventy-two bar-shaped samples were fabricated using a digital light processing 3D printer and were divided into 2 groups (n = 36 each). Group I samples were fabricated by dual-layer technique, with the denture base and tooth-colored resins were printed sequentially in a single print cycle. Group II samples were printed separately and bonded with denture base resin. Flexural strength and fracture toughness were tested according to ISO 20795-1:2013, and impact strength was evaluated using ASTM D-256.Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis comprised Shapiro-Wilk for normality, t-test for flexural strength, and Mann-Whitney U-test for fracture toughness and impact strength (α = 0.05).

Results: Group I exhibited significantly higher flexural strength (82.78 ± 2.02 MPa) and fracture toughness (89.91 ± 0.53 MPa) compared to Group II (80.01 ± 2.69 MPa and 86.93 ± 2.29 MPa, respectively). Conversely, impact strength was greater in Group II (4.17 ± 0.39 J) than in Group I (3.00 ± 1.04 J) (P < .05).

Conclusion: The dual-layer printing technique improved the flexural and fracture resistance of denture base materials by eliminating interfacial weaknesses. Although bonded resins exhibited higher impact strength, the structural advantages of dual-printing support its application in clinical prosthodontics.

双层与粘结三维打印义齿基托材料力学性能的体外比较研究。
目的:比较采用双层和粘结3D打印技术制备的义齿基托材料的弯曲强度、断裂韧性和冲击强度。设置和设计:体外比较研究。材料与方法:采用数字光处理3D打印机制作72个条形样品,分为2组,每组36个。第一组采用双层打印技术,在一个打印周期内依次打印义齿基托和牙色树脂。第二组样品单独打印,与义齿基托树脂粘接。弯曲强度和断裂韧性按照ISO 20795-1:2013进行测试,冲击强度按照ASTM D-256进行评估。统计学方法:正态性采用Shapiro-Wilk检验,弯曲强度采用t检验,断裂韧性和冲击强度采用Mann-Whitney u检验(α = 0.05)。结果:ⅰ组的抗折强度(82.78±2.02 MPa)和断裂韧性(89.91±0.53 MPa)明显高于ⅱ组(80.01±2.69 MPa和86.93±2.29 MPa)。相反,II组的冲击强度(4.17±0.39 J)大于I组(3.00±1.04 J) (P < 0.05)。结论:双层打印技术通过消除界面缺陷,提高了义齿基托材料的抗折性和抗折性。虽然结合树脂具有较高的冲击强度,但双打印的结构优势支持其在临床修复中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书