Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Extra-Large Aortic Annuli: Insights From a Large Cohort

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.12.015
Ziad Arow MD , Omar Oliva MD , Laurent Bonfils MD , Laurent Lepage MD , Abid Assali MD , Ranin Hilu MD , Nicolas Dumonteil MD , Didier Tchetche MD , Chiara De Biase MD
{"title":"Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Extra-Large Aortic Annuli: Insights From a Large Cohort","authors":"Ziad Arow MD ,&nbsp;Omar Oliva MD ,&nbsp;Laurent Bonfils MD ,&nbsp;Laurent Lepage MD ,&nbsp;Abid Assali MD ,&nbsp;Ranin Hilu MD ,&nbsp;Nicolas Dumonteil MD ,&nbsp;Didier Tchetche MD ,&nbsp;Chiara De Biase MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.12.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Patients with large or extra-large aortic annuli pose a particular challenge for Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as clinical outcomes are less favorable than in patients with smaller annuli. This study aimed to evaluate periprocedural and clinical outcomes in patients with large and extra-large annuli undergoing TAVR and to compare results between balloon-expandable (BEVs) and self-expanding valves (SEVs). This study included patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and extra-large annuli who underwent TAVR with either BEVs or SEVs. The primary endpoints were periprocedural and clinical outcomes, including device success, rates of moderate or greater paravalvular leak (PVL), permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, new Left bundle branch block (LBBB), stroke, and in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Secondary endpoints included safety outcomes and subgroup analyses comparing outcomes between patients with large (annular perimeter &gt;90 mm and an area &gt;660 mm²) and extra-large annuli (perimeter &gt;96 mm and an area &gt;730 mm²). A total of 237 patients underwent TAVR, including 160 with BEVs and 77 with SEVs. The mean annular area and perimeter were 737 ± 76 mm² and 96.1 ± 4.1 mm, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. Overall device success was high, though slightly lower in the SEV group (84% vs. 93%, p = 0.034), a difference that was no longer statistically significant after multivariate analysis (p = 0.234). Moderate or greater PVL occurred more frequently with SEVs (13% vs. 4%, p = 0.016), particularly in patients with extra-large annuli (26% vs. 4%, p = 0.012). One-year mortality was similar between groups (SEV 13% vs. BEV 12%, p = 0.807), and no significant differences were observed in PPM implantation, new LBBB, stroke, or major vascular and bleeding complications. TAVR is feasible and safe in patients with large and extra-large annuli, with higher rates of moderate or greater paravalvular leak observed in SEV patients with extra-large annuli.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"262 ","pages":"Pages 1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925007568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with large or extra-large aortic annuli pose a particular challenge for Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as clinical outcomes are less favorable than in patients with smaller annuli. This study aimed to evaluate periprocedural and clinical outcomes in patients with large and extra-large annuli undergoing TAVR and to compare results between balloon-expandable (BEVs) and self-expanding valves (SEVs). This study included patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and extra-large annuli who underwent TAVR with either BEVs or SEVs. The primary endpoints were periprocedural and clinical outcomes, including device success, rates of moderate or greater paravalvular leak (PVL), permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, new Left bundle branch block (LBBB), stroke, and in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Secondary endpoints included safety outcomes and subgroup analyses comparing outcomes between patients with large (annular perimeter >90 mm and an area >660 mm²) and extra-large annuli (perimeter >96 mm and an area >730 mm²). A total of 237 patients underwent TAVR, including 160 with BEVs and 77 with SEVs. The mean annular area and perimeter were 737 ± 76 mm² and 96.1 ± 4.1 mm, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. Overall device success was high, though slightly lower in the SEV group (84% vs. 93%, p = 0.034), a difference that was no longer statistically significant after multivariate analysis (p = 0.234). Moderate or greater PVL occurred more frequently with SEVs (13% vs. 4%, p = 0.016), particularly in patients with extra-large annuli (26% vs. 4%, p = 0.012). One-year mortality was similar between groups (SEV 13% vs. BEV 12%, p = 0.807), and no significant differences were observed in PPM implantation, new LBBB, stroke, or major vascular and bleeding complications. TAVR is feasible and safe in patients with large and extra-large annuli, with higher rates of moderate or greater paravalvular leak observed in SEV patients with extra-large annuli.
特大主动脉环患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术:来自大队列的见解。
背景:大或特大主动脉环空患者对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)提出了特殊的挑战,因为临床结果不如小环空患者好。本研究旨在评估大环空和特大环空患者行TAVR的围术期和临床结果,并比较球囊膨胀性瓣膜(bev)和自膨胀性瓣膜(sev)的结果。方法:本研究纳入了严重主动脉狭窄(AS)和特大环空的患者,他们接受了bev或sev的TAVR。主要终点是围手术期和临床结果,包括器械成功、中度或更严重的瓣旁漏(PVL)、永久性起搏器(PPM)植入、新的左束支阻滞(LBBB)、中风、住院死亡率和1年内死亡率。次要终点包括安全性结果和亚组分析,比较大环空(环周90 mm,面积660 mm²)和超大环空(环周96 mm,面积730 mm²)患者的结果。结果:共237例患者行TAVR,其中bev组160例,sev组77例。平均环面积和周长分别为737 ± 76 mm²和96.1 ± 4.1 mm,组间差异无统计学意义。尽管SEV组的器械成功率略低(84% vs. 93%, p=0.034),但在多变量分析后,这一差异不再具有统计学意义(p=0.234)。中度或更严重的PVL在sev患者中更常见(13% vs. 4%, p = 0.016),特别是在特大环空患者中(26% vs. 4%, p = 0.012)。两组间一年死亡率相似(SEV 13% vs BEV 12%, p = 0.807),在PPM植入、新的LBBB、中风或主要血管和出血并发症方面无显著差异。综上所述:TAVR在大环空和特大环空患者中是可行和安全的,特大环空SEV患者出现中度或较大瓣旁漏的比例较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书