Restricted access to GPs had limited effect on consultations for mental health problems in deprived areas during COVID-19: A cohort study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Public Health Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.106116
S. Sana , T. Magnée , S. van Pelt , V. Premysl , P.J.E. Bindels , S. Denktaş , E.I.T. de Schepper , P.L. Kocken
{"title":"Restricted access to GPs had limited effect on consultations for mental health problems in deprived areas during COVID-19: A cohort study","authors":"S. Sana ,&nbsp;T. Magnée ,&nbsp;S. van Pelt ,&nbsp;V. Premysl ,&nbsp;P.J.E. Bindels ,&nbsp;S. Denktaş ,&nbsp;E.I.T. de Schepper ,&nbsp;P.L. Kocken","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.106116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Stringent COVID-19 lockdown measures with limited access to GP practices raised concerns about the primary mental care access for patients from deprived neighbourhoods. This study investigated the number of mental health GP consultations among patients in deprived neighbourhoods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Observational study from January 2018 to June 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medical records of 379,567 patients were analyzed. We applied segmented time-series Poisson regression analyses to compare monthly mental health consultations in the first lockdown phase (March–May 2020) and the period thereafter with the pre-pandemic period for the total sample and separately for patients in deprived and non-deprived neighbourhoods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis of 759,863 mental health consultations showed fewer consultations during the first lockdown phase, than pre-pandemic levels (RR = 0·955; 95 % CI = 0·919–0·993). This decrease was only significant among patients in non-deprived neighbourhoods Conversely, a significant increase in consultations during the post-lockdown phase was observed among patients in deprived neighbourhoods (RR = 1·074; 95 % CI = 1·002–1·152), returning to pre-pandemic levels for patients in non-deprived neighbourhoods. For the whole study population, patients had more consultations per month during the first lockdown phase and post-lockdown phase (RR = 1·095; 95 % CI = 1·079–1·111 and RR = 1·064; 95 % CI = 1·051–1·078 respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>During the lockdown phase the GP seemed accessible for patients with mental health problems in deprived neighbourhoods. A general decline in consultations during first lockdown phase, only significant in non-deprived neighbourhoods, was followed by increase in deprived neighbourhoods only during post-lockdown. This can be explained by a higher frequency of mental health consultations per patient. Sufficient access to primary health care should be guaranteed to ensure mental health treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625005621","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Stringent COVID-19 lockdown measures with limited access to GP practices raised concerns about the primary mental care access for patients from deprived neighbourhoods. This study investigated the number of mental health GP consultations among patients in deprived neighbourhoods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study design

Observational study from January 2018 to June 2022.

Methods

Medical records of 379,567 patients were analyzed. We applied segmented time-series Poisson regression analyses to compare monthly mental health consultations in the first lockdown phase (March–May 2020) and the period thereafter with the pre-pandemic period for the total sample and separately for patients in deprived and non-deprived neighbourhoods.

Results

Analysis of 759,863 mental health consultations showed fewer consultations during the first lockdown phase, than pre-pandemic levels (RR = 0·955; 95 % CI = 0·919–0·993). This decrease was only significant among patients in non-deprived neighbourhoods Conversely, a significant increase in consultations during the post-lockdown phase was observed among patients in deprived neighbourhoods (RR = 1·074; 95 % CI = 1·002–1·152), returning to pre-pandemic levels for patients in non-deprived neighbourhoods. For the whole study population, patients had more consultations per month during the first lockdown phase and post-lockdown phase (RR = 1·095; 95 % CI = 1·079–1·111 and RR = 1·064; 95 % CI = 1·051–1·078 respectively).

Conclusions

During the lockdown phase the GP seemed accessible for patients with mental health problems in deprived neighbourhoods. A general decline in consultations during first lockdown phase, only significant in non-deprived neighbourhoods, was followed by increase in deprived neighbourhoods only during post-lockdown. This can be explained by a higher frequency of mental health consultations per patient. Sufficient access to primary health care should be guaranteed to ensure mental health treatment.
限制获得全科医生对COVID-19期间贫困地区心理健康问题咨询的影响有限:一项队列研究。
目标:严格的COVID-19封锁措施以及对全科医生诊所的限制,引发了人们对贫困社区患者获得初级精神保健的担忧。本研究调查了在COVID-19大流行之前和期间贫困社区患者的心理健康全科医生咨询次数。研究设计:2018年1月至2022年6月的观察性研究。方法:对379,567例患者的病历资料进行分析。我们应用分段时间序列泊松回归分析,将第一个封锁阶段(2020年3月至5月)及其后的时期与大流行前时期的每月心理健康咨询进行比较,并分别对贫困和非贫困社区的患者进行比较。结果:对759,863份心理健康咨询的分析显示,在第一个封锁阶段,咨询人数少于大流行前(RR = 0.955; 95% CI = 0.919 - 0.993)。相反,在封锁后阶段,贫困社区患者的咨询人数显著增加(RR = 1.074; 95% CI = 1.002 - 1.152),非贫困社区患者的咨询人数恢复到大流行前的水平。在整个研究人群中,患者在封城第一阶段和封城后每月就诊次数较多(RR = 1.095; 95% CI = 1.079 - 1.0111; RR = 1.064; 95% CI = 1.051 - 1.078)。结论:在封锁阶段,家庭医生似乎可以为贫困社区的精神健康问题患者提供帮助。在第一个封锁阶段,咨询人数普遍下降,仅在非贫困社区显著下降,随后只有在封锁后,贫困社区的咨询人数才有所增加。这可以解释为每个病人接受心理健康咨询的频率较高。应保证充分获得初级卫生保健,以确保精神卫生治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书