Conversion of subjective cognitive decline to MCI and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences and risk factors.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Morgan D Tallman, Holly Timblin, Taylor Maynard, Brianna E Kelly, Rebecca K MacAulay
{"title":"Conversion of subjective cognitive decline to MCI and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences and risk factors.","authors":"Morgan D Tallman, Holly Timblin, Taylor Maynard, Brianna E Kelly, Rebecca K MacAulay","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2609824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is an important yet heterogeneous indicator of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Sex and health-related disparities in risk are well established, but differences in prevalence and conversion rates from SCD to MCI/Dementia by risk factor remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This preregistered study followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct a systematic review with a narrative synthesis and meta-analyses. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated the relative risk (RR) of sex, depression, hypertension, and diabetes in conversion from SCD to MCI/dementia. Q and I<sup>2</sup> statistics investigated heterogeneity. Prevalence rates were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five cross-cultural studies (<i>N</i> = 1136) were eligible for the meta-analyses. Participants, on average, had less than 12 years of education. Pooled analyses showed no significant differences in the RR of conversion for depression, hypertension, or diabetes. The pooled conversion rate of SCD to MCI was 17.2% and 8.7% to dementia. Evidence of heterogeneity suggested that the aggregated data may mask differences between studies; thus, unpublished conversion rates on comorbid SCD and the health conditions are reported to inform future research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative risk estimates align with the greater literature and extend them to an inclusive cross-cultural sample with lower education. The significant heterogeneity found underscores the complexity of the interactions between cognitive decline and modifiable risk factors. This study provides novel conversion rates to MCI and dementia for individuals with comorbid SCD and depression, hypertension, and diabetes. We recommend that sex-stratified conversion rates are reported, as limited data prevented our meta-analysis from examining this important dimension of risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"405-417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2609824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is an important yet heterogeneous indicator of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Sex and health-related disparities in risk are well established, but differences in prevalence and conversion rates from SCD to MCI/Dementia by risk factor remain unclear.

Method: This preregistered study followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct a systematic review with a narrative synthesis and meta-analyses. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated the relative risk (RR) of sex, depression, hypertension, and diabetes in conversion from SCD to MCI/dementia. Q and I2 statistics investigated heterogeneity. Prevalence rates were also calculated.

Results: Five cross-cultural studies (N = 1136) were eligible for the meta-analyses. Participants, on average, had less than 12 years of education. Pooled analyses showed no significant differences in the RR of conversion for depression, hypertension, or diabetes. The pooled conversion rate of SCD to MCI was 17.2% and 8.7% to dementia. Evidence of heterogeneity suggested that the aggregated data may mask differences between studies; thus, unpublished conversion rates on comorbid SCD and the health conditions are reported to inform future research.

Conclusions: Relative risk estimates align with the greater literature and extend them to an inclusive cross-cultural sample with lower education. The significant heterogeneity found underscores the complexity of the interactions between cognitive decline and modifiable risk factors. This study provides novel conversion rates to MCI and dementia for individuals with comorbid SCD and depression, hypertension, and diabetes. We recommend that sex-stratified conversion rates are reported, as limited data prevented our meta-analysis from examining this important dimension of risk.

主观认知能力下降转化为轻度认知障碍和痴呆:性别差异和风险因素的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:主观认知衰退(SCD)是轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆的重要但异质性指标。性别和健康相关的风险差异已得到证实,但SCD向MCI/痴呆的患病率和转换率的风险因素差异仍不清楚。方法:本预注册研究遵循PRISMA指南,采用叙述性综合和荟萃分析进行系统评价。随机效应荟萃分析计算了性别、抑郁、高血压和糖尿病在SCD向MCI/痴呆转化中的相对风险(RR)。Q和I2统计分析异质性。患病率也被计算出来。结果:5项跨文化研究(N = 1136)符合meta分析。参与者平均受教育程度不到12年。合并分析显示,抑郁症、高血压或糖尿病患者的转化风险比无显著差异。SCD转化为MCI的总转化率为17.2%,转化为痴呆的总转化率为8.7%。异质性的证据表明,汇总数据可能掩盖了研究之间的差异;因此,未发表的SCD合并症和健康状况的转换率报告为未来的研究提供了信息。结论:相对风险估计与更多的文献一致,并将其扩展到具有较低教育水平的包容性跨文化样本。发现的显著异质性强调了认知能力下降和可改变的风险因素之间相互作用的复杂性。这项研究为伴有SCD、抑郁症、高血压和糖尿病的个体提供了MCI和痴呆的新转换率。我们建议报告按性别分层的转换率,因为有限的数据使我们的荟萃分析无法检查这一重要的风险维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书