Correcting CT-derived aortic valve area for LVOT ellipticity: A novel approach

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
International journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2026-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.134122
Yoav Niv Granot , Solomon W. Bienstock , Daniel Karlsberg , Gilbert H.L. Tang , Stamatios Lerakis
{"title":"Correcting CT-derived aortic valve area for LVOT ellipticity: A novel approach","authors":"Yoav Niv Granot ,&nbsp;Solomon W. Bienstock ,&nbsp;Daniel Karlsberg ,&nbsp;Gilbert H.L. Tang ,&nbsp;Stamatios Lerakis","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.134122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A limitation of echocardiography is its tendency to underestimate the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area due to reliance on single diameter. While substituting CT-derived LVOT area in aortic valve area calculations (AVA_CT) increases the calculated valve area, this does not improve its clinical utility. In fact, AVA_CT overestimates the AVA, requiring a higher threshold for defining severe aortic stenosis [AS] (&lt;1.2 cm<sup>2</sup>). This phenomenon may be attributed to differences in fluid flow dynamics between circular (assumed by echocardiography) and elliptical conduits.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Demonstrate the differences between the calculated AVA before and after implementing a mathematical correction factor for flow in a non-circular conduit.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>662 patients with severe AS who underwent aortic valve replacement between 06/2021 and 07/2023. AVA calculated using the continuity equation with both echocardiography and CT data. A correction factor (CF) for elliptical flow was applied per patient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AVA_CT was significantly higher than AVA_Echo, showing a 23 % increase. After correcting for the elliptical shape of the LVOT, AVA_CT-corrected was lower and closer to AVA_Echo (mean absolute difference of 0.06 cm<sup>2</sup>) and had superior correlation with invasive measurement. Several patients were reclassified from severe to moderate AS when using AVA_CT; however, applying the correction factor significantly reduced the reclassification.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Incorporating a correction factor for the elliptical geometry of the LVOT improves the accuracy of AVA estimation. The corrected AVA demonstrates better agreement with echocardiographic measurements and reduces the overestimation inherent in CT-based calculations. This approach minimizes discrepancies in patientclassification across AS severity categories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"447 ","pages":"Article 134122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325011659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A limitation of echocardiography is its tendency to underestimate the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area due to reliance on single diameter. While substituting CT-derived LVOT area in aortic valve area calculations (AVA_CT) increases the calculated valve area, this does not improve its clinical utility. In fact, AVA_CT overestimates the AVA, requiring a higher threshold for defining severe aortic stenosis [AS] (<1.2 cm2). This phenomenon may be attributed to differences in fluid flow dynamics between circular (assumed by echocardiography) and elliptical conduits.

Aim

Demonstrate the differences between the calculated AVA before and after implementing a mathematical correction factor for flow in a non-circular conduit.

Methods

662 patients with severe AS who underwent aortic valve replacement between 06/2021 and 07/2023. AVA calculated using the continuity equation with both echocardiography and CT data. A correction factor (CF) for elliptical flow was applied per patient.

Results

AVA_CT was significantly higher than AVA_Echo, showing a 23 % increase. After correcting for the elliptical shape of the LVOT, AVA_CT-corrected was lower and closer to AVA_Echo (mean absolute difference of 0.06 cm2) and had superior correlation with invasive measurement. Several patients were reclassified from severe to moderate AS when using AVA_CT; however, applying the correction factor significantly reduced the reclassification.

Conclusion

Incorporating a correction factor for the elliptical geometry of the LVOT improves the accuracy of AVA estimation. The corrected AVA demonstrates better agreement with echocardiographic measurements and reduces the overestimation inherent in CT-based calculations. This approach minimizes discrepancies in patientclassification across AS severity categories.

Abstract Image

校正ct衍生的LVOT椭圆主动脉瓣面积:一种新方法。
背景:超声心动图的一个局限性是它倾向于低估左心室流出道(LVOT)面积,因为它依赖于单个直径。虽然在主动脉瓣面积计算(AVA_CT)中替代ct衍生的LVOT面积增加了计算的瓣膜面积,但这并没有提高其临床实用性。事实上,AVA_CT高估了AVA,需要更高的阈值来定义严重的主动脉狭窄[AS](2)。这种现象可能归因于圆形(超声心动图假设)和椭圆形导管之间流体流动动力学的差异。目的:论证对非圆形管道内流动进行数学校正系数前后计算出的AVA之间的差异。方法:662例在2021年6月至2023年7月期间接受主动脉瓣置换术的严重AS患者。利用超声心动图和CT数据的连续性方程计算AVA。对每位患者应用椭圆血流校正因子(CF)。结果:AVA_CT明显高于AVA_Echo,增高23% %。校正LVOT的椭圆形状后,ava_ct校正值更低,更接近AVA_Echo(平均绝对差值为0.06 cm2),与有创伤测量具有较好的相关性。使用AVA_CT将部分患者从重度AS重新分类为中度AS;然而,应用校正因子显著减少了重分类。结论:结合LVOT椭圆几何形状的校正因子提高了AVA估计的准确性。校正后的AVA显示出与超声心动图测量结果更好的一致性,并减少了基于ct计算固有的高估。这种方法最大限度地减少了AS严重程度类别中患者分类的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书