Sex-based differences in outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

IF 2.3 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Current Opinion in Physiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.cophys.2025.100889
Alice Narushevich , Yazan Saleh , Abigail Greek , Hamnah Majeed , Bobby Yanagawa
{"title":"Sex-based differences in outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery","authors":"Alice Narushevich ,&nbsp;Yazan Saleh ,&nbsp;Abigail Greek ,&nbsp;Hamnah Majeed ,&nbsp;Bobby Yanagawa","doi":"10.1016/j.cophys.2025.100889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is the gold standard treatment for complex coronary revascularization. Despite advancements in the field, females continue to experience higher rates of morbidity and mortality post-CABG surgery compared to males. Such differences may be explained by smaller coronary anatomy, technically more challenging surgery, delayed diagnosis leading to a more complex disease process at presentation, different use of surgical techniques, and the under-representation of females in cardiac surgery. Potential targeted strategies to improve surgical outcomes in females post-CABG surgery may include the creation of specialized clinics focused on female cardiovascular health, clinical trials that focus on recruitment of female participants in the primary analysis, and increased female physician representation in cardiac surgery. This narrative review provides an in-depth summary of sex-based differences in CABG surgery outcomes, with a focus on the most recent published literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52156,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Physiology","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246886732500077X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is the gold standard treatment for complex coronary revascularization. Despite advancements in the field, females continue to experience higher rates of morbidity and mortality post-CABG surgery compared to males. Such differences may be explained by smaller coronary anatomy, technically more challenging surgery, delayed diagnosis leading to a more complex disease process at presentation, different use of surgical techniques, and the under-representation of females in cardiac surgery. Potential targeted strategies to improve surgical outcomes in females post-CABG surgery may include the creation of specialized clinics focused on female cardiovascular health, clinical trials that focus on recruitment of female participants in the primary analysis, and increased female physician representation in cardiac surgery. This narrative review provides an in-depth summary of sex-based differences in CABG surgery outcomes, with a focus on the most recent published literature.
冠状动脉搭桥术后结果的性别差异
冠状动脉搭桥(CABG)手术是复杂冠状动脉重建术的金标准治疗。尽管该领域取得了进步,但女性在cabg手术后的发病率和死亡率仍然高于男性。这种差异可能是由于冠状动脉解剖结构较小,手术技术上更具挑战性,诊断延迟导致更复杂的疾病过程,不同的手术技术使用,以及女性在心脏手术中的代表性不足。改善女性冠状动脉搭桥术后手术结果的潜在目标策略可能包括:建立专注于女性心血管健康的专门诊所,在初步分析中重点招募女性参与者的临床试验,以及增加女性医生在心脏手术中的代表性。这篇叙述性综述深入总结了基于性别的CABG手术结果差异,重点是最近发表的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Physiology
Current Opinion in Physiology Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书