Intimate hygiene practices during pregnancy with demographic and preterm birth associations: a large cohort study

IF 2.7
AJOG global reports Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100592
Josef Alexander Locher MBChB, MMED , Amy Wise MBBCh, MMED , Renate Strehlau MBBCh, PhD
{"title":"Intimate hygiene practices during pregnancy with demographic and preterm birth associations: a large cohort study","authors":"Josef Alexander Locher MBChB, MMED ,&nbsp;Amy Wise MBBCh, MMED ,&nbsp;Renate Strehlau MBBCh, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intimate hygiene practices during pregnancy can influence maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Limited data exist on these practices among South African women. This study aimed to characterize intimate hygiene practices among pregnant women in Johannesburg and examine associations with demographic factors and preterm birth.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A secondary analysis was conducted on data from 18,076 pregnant women enrolled in the Group B Streptococcus Correlates of Protection Cohort Study in Johannesburg, South Africa. Participants completed questionnaires detailing their intimate hygiene practices, including frequency, methods, and products used. Statistical analyses assessed the prevalence of these practices, their association with demographic characteristics (age, race, education, occupation, dwelling type, parity, and HIV status), and preterm birth outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age was 28.4 years (range 18–49). Most participants were Black (93.0%), single (80.4%), unemployed (64.7%), and resided in urban areas (70.7%). They reported a median intimate cleaning frequency of 14 times per week (IQR 8–14). Over half (53.3%) practiced douching, and 48.4% added products to their bathwater.</div><div>Race was significantly associated with adding bathwater products (<em>P</em>&lt;.00001). White women (44.3%) had the highest proportion adding products. Tertiary-educated mothers were more likely to add products (27.0%, <em>P</em>=.0041). Students had the highest rate of product use (28.7%, <em>P</em>=.0018). Urban participants were more likely to add products (25.2%) than semi-urban women (23.2%, <em>P</em>=.025).</div><div>Douching was also significantly associated with race (<em>P</em>&lt;.00001), with the “Other” category (65.1%) reporting the highest rate. Women with no schooling had the highest douching rate (53.2%, <em>P</em>=.0006). Semi-urban mothers douched the most frequently (53.4%, <em>P</em>&lt;.00001). Marital status was significantly associated with douching (<em>P</em>&lt;.00001), with the highest prevalence among single women (45.8%). Occupation was also significantly associated with douching (<em>P</em>=.016), with students having the highest douching prevalence (28.7%).</div><div>A significant association was observed between gestational age and the addition of products to bathwater for deliveries between 34 and &lt;37 weeks compared to term deliveries (<em>P</em>=.045). Women who did not add products were more likely to deliver at term, while those who added products had a higher likelihood of delivering preterm. For deliveries &lt;34 weeks compared to 34–&lt;37 weeks, women who did not add products were more likely to deliver at 34–&lt;37 weeks (<em>P</em>=.02).</div><div>For deliveries at &lt;34 weeks compared to 34–&lt;37 weeks, women who douched were less likely to deliver at &lt;34 weeks, while those who did not douche had lower proportions of deliveries at 34–&lt;37 weeks (<em>P</em>=.035).</div><div>In the combined preterm category (&lt;37 weeks) compared to term deliveries, a statistically significant association was observed (<em>P</em>=.035), with women who douched being more likely to deliver preterm. Although some early preterm categories were more frequent among those who douched, overall no consistent statistically significant associations were found between hygiene practices and preterm birth outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Intimate hygiene practices are prevalent among pregnant women in Johannesburg and are significantly associated with various demographic factors. While some associations with preterm birth were identified, no consistent significant association was established, warranting further studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100592"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825001534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intimate hygiene practices during pregnancy can influence maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Limited data exist on these practices among South African women. This study aimed to characterize intimate hygiene practices among pregnant women in Johannesburg and examine associations with demographic factors and preterm birth.

Methods

A secondary analysis was conducted on data from 18,076 pregnant women enrolled in the Group B Streptococcus Correlates of Protection Cohort Study in Johannesburg, South Africa. Participants completed questionnaires detailing their intimate hygiene practices, including frequency, methods, and products used. Statistical analyses assessed the prevalence of these practices, their association with demographic characteristics (age, race, education, occupation, dwelling type, parity, and HIV status), and preterm birth outcomes.

Results

The mean age was 28.4 years (range 18–49). Most participants were Black (93.0%), single (80.4%), unemployed (64.7%), and resided in urban areas (70.7%). They reported a median intimate cleaning frequency of 14 times per week (IQR 8–14). Over half (53.3%) practiced douching, and 48.4% added products to their bathwater.
Race was significantly associated with adding bathwater products (P<.00001). White women (44.3%) had the highest proportion adding products. Tertiary-educated mothers were more likely to add products (27.0%, P=.0041). Students had the highest rate of product use (28.7%, P=.0018). Urban participants were more likely to add products (25.2%) than semi-urban women (23.2%, P=.025).
Douching was also significantly associated with race (P<.00001), with the “Other” category (65.1%) reporting the highest rate. Women with no schooling had the highest douching rate (53.2%, P=.0006). Semi-urban mothers douched the most frequently (53.4%, P<.00001). Marital status was significantly associated with douching (P<.00001), with the highest prevalence among single women (45.8%). Occupation was also significantly associated with douching (P=.016), with students having the highest douching prevalence (28.7%).
A significant association was observed between gestational age and the addition of products to bathwater for deliveries between 34 and <37 weeks compared to term deliveries (P=.045). Women who did not add products were more likely to deliver at term, while those who added products had a higher likelihood of delivering preterm. For deliveries <34 weeks compared to 34–<37 weeks, women who did not add products were more likely to deliver at 34–<37 weeks (P=.02).
For deliveries at <34 weeks compared to 34–<37 weeks, women who douched were less likely to deliver at <34 weeks, while those who did not douche had lower proportions of deliveries at 34–<37 weeks (P=.035).
In the combined preterm category (<37 weeks) compared to term deliveries, a statistically significant association was observed (P=.035), with women who douched being more likely to deliver preterm. Although some early preterm categories were more frequent among those who douched, overall no consistent statistically significant associations were found between hygiene practices and preterm birth outcomes.

Conclusion

Intimate hygiene practices are prevalent among pregnant women in Johannesburg and are significantly associated with various demographic factors. While some associations with preterm birth were identified, no consistent significant association was established, warranting further studies.
怀孕期间的亲密卫生习惯与人口统计学和早产相关:一项大型队列研究
背景:怀孕期间的良好卫生习惯会影响孕产妇和新生儿的健康结果。关于南非妇女这些做法的数据有限。本研究旨在描述约翰内斯堡孕妇的亲密卫生习惯,并研究其与人口因素和早产的关系。方法对南非约翰内斯堡参加B群链球菌相关保护队列研究的18076名孕妇的数据进行二次分析。参与者完成问卷,详细说明他们的亲密卫生习惯,包括频率、方法和使用的产品。统计分析评估了这些做法的流行程度,它们与人口统计学特征(年龄、种族、教育、职业、居住类型、胎次和艾滋病毒状况)以及早产结局的关系。结果患者平均年龄28.4岁(18 ~ 49岁)。大多数参与者是黑人(93.0%),单身(80.4%),失业(64.7%),居住在城市地区(70.7%)。他们报告的私密清洁频率中位数为每周14次(IQR 8-14)。超过一半(53.3%)的人练习冲洗,48.4%的人在洗澡水中添加产品。种族与添加洗澡水产品显著相关(P<.00001)。白人女性(44.3%)添加产品的比例最高。受过高等教育的母亲更有可能添加产品(27.0%,P= 0.0041)。学生的产品使用率最高(28.7%,P= 0.0018)。城市参与者(25.2%)比半城市女性(23.2%,P= 0.025)更有可能添加产品。冲洗也与种族显著相关(P<.00001),“其他”类别(65.1%)报告的发生率最高。未受教育妇女的灌洗率最高(53.2%,P= 0.0006)。半城市母亲冲洗次数最多(53.4%,p < 0.001)。婚姻状况与灌洗有显著相关性(P< 0.00001),其中单身女性的患病率最高(45.8%)。职业与灌洗率也有显著相关性(P= 0.016),其中学生的灌洗率最高(28.7%)。与足月分娩相比,在孕周34至37周分娩时,在洗澡水中添加产品与胎龄之间存在显著关联(P= 0.045)。没有添加产品的女性更有可能足月分娩,而添加产品的女性更有可能早产。34周分娩与34 - 37周分娩相比,未添加产品的妇女更有可能在34 - 37周分娩(P= 0.02)。34周分娩与34 - 37周分娩相比,冲洗妇女在34周分娩的可能性较低,而未冲洗妇女在34 - 37周分娩的比例较低(P= 0.035)。与足月分娩相比,在合并早产类别(37周)中,观察到统计学上显著的关联(P= 0.035),冲洗的妇女更有可能早产。虽然一些早期早产类别在那些冲洗者中更常见,但总体而言,在卫生习惯和早产结果之间没有发现一致的统计学显著关联。结论约翰内斯堡孕妇的亲密卫生习惯普遍存在,并与各种人口因素显著相关。虽然确定了与早产的一些关联,但没有建立一致的显著关联,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书